Debate Club

Should the U.S. Withdraw from Afghanistan Sooner? >

Leave Afghanistan to the Afghans

The U.S. should accelerate its withdrawal because only the Afghans can make their future

March 16, 2012

About Doug Bandow:

Doug Bandow is a senior fellow at the Cato Institute, specializing in foreign policy and civil liberties. A former special assistant to Ronald Reagan, he has authored multiple books and his writing appears regularly in major outlets. Bandow holds a J.D. from Stanford University.

Afghanistan is a tragedy. But it has been a tragedy for centuries. After more than a decade of attempted nation-building, the U.S. should accelerate its withdrawal. Only the Afghans can make their future.

Washington intervened in Afghanistan for a specific purpose: destroy al Qaeda and oust the Taliban for hosting anti-American terrorists. The U.S. quickly fulfilled both objectives.

The best hope for the U.S. to create a stable and peaceful Afghanistan was in 2002 and 2003. But the Bush administration was fixated on Iraq and quickly withdrew military resources from Afghanistan, promoting failure there. The Obama administration twice increased troop levels in Afghanistan in a desperate attempt to recoup lost ground.

[See pictures of Afghans mourning the recent rogue attack.]

Since then, the U.S. military has put the Taliban on the defensive and allied commanders publicly profess support for the administration's planned withdrawal in 2014. However, on a recent trip to Afghanistan I found less confidence in private. So long as the Afghan government remains corrupt and incompetent and the Taliban finds aid and sanctuary in neighboring Pakistan, the vision of a stable, peaceful Afghanistan likely will remain a chimera.

There is another, deeper problem with western attempts at nation-building in Central Asia. Afghanistan is not America or Europe, a fact highlighted by the recent deadly riots in response to the Koran burning by U.S. troops. Politicians, some allied with President Hamid Karzai, even encouraged the violence. Last year a similar mob slaughtered United Nations staffers after a Koran burning in America.

Afghanistan may eventually end up with a reasonably liberal society and effective government, but only on its own accord. There are, in fact, many Afghans, particularly women, who desire liberty and equality. However, the U.S. cannot turn Afghanistan into a modern nation-state, at least at reasonable cost in reasonable time.

It is time for the Obama administration to recognize this and stop sacrificing American lives.

[U.S., Afghan Lawmakers Clash Over Alleged Gunman's Trial.]

Washington should accelerate its troop withdrawal. Along the way there is much the U.S. should do: offer sanctuary to liberal-minded Afghans, press negotiations with the Taliban setting America's red lines (such as al Qaeda's return), and engage regional powers, including Iran, to limit the spread of conflict.

Equally important, the U.S. should learn from its failure. No more attempts at global social engineering.

There are no good options in Afghanistan. But after a decade of war in Central Asia it is time for America to leave.

Tags:
military strategy,
Obama administration,
War in Afghanistan (2001-),
Afghanistan
Other Arguments
#1
#2

Yes — The drawdown of U.S. troops should not be our only goal in Afghanistan

CAROLINE WADHAMS, Senior Fellow at the Center for American Progress

#3
#4

Yes — Neither staying the course nor doubling down on our investment offers a realistic path to success

JEFF SMITH, Kraemer Strategy Fellow and Director of the South Asia Program at the American Foreign Policy Council

#6

No — Departure from Afghanistan ought to be orderly and clearly defined

SHUJA NAWAZ, Director of the South Asia Center at the Atlantic Council

About Debate Club

A meeting of the sharpest minds on the day's most important topics, Debate Club brings in the best arguments and lets readers decide which is the most persuasive. Read the arguments, then vote. And be sure to check back often to see who has gotten the most support—and also to see what's being discussed now in the Debate Club.

Have ideas about what the Club should be debating? E-mail it to dclub@usnews.com.

You can also join the debate on Facebook or follow Debate Club on Twitter.

Advertisement
Cartoons
Thomas Jefferson Street Blog
President Obama's Code Pink Heckler Medea Benjamin Was Plain Rude

It's become acceptable for people to interrupt the president while he is delivering a formal speech on a deadly serious topic.

Obama Commerce Nominee Penny Pritzker’s Tax Problem

Obama’s Commerce Department nominee has some Romney-esque tax issues.

Oklahoma Tornado Reminds Us of the Value of Teachers

The Oklahoma tornado reminds us of all the roles teachers take on.

IRS, AP and James Rosen Scandals Strike at the First Amendment

The Obama scandals paint a picture of an administration at odds with the First Amendment.

Anthony Weiner Is Too Liberal to Be New York City Mayor

New York City doesn't need another Democratic mayor.

Organizations Masquerading as Tax-Exempt is the Real IRS Scandal

The real scandal at the IRS is electioneering groups getting tax-exempt status.

E.W. Jackson Proves the Tea Party Learned Nothing

By nominating E.W. Jackson, Virginia Republicans hope extremism will save them.

IRS, AP and Benghazi Are Not Obama Scandals

The word "scandal" doesn't appropriately describe anything going on in Washington these days.

Advertisement