Debate Club

Should the U.S. Withdraw from Afghanistan Sooner? >

Leave Afghanistan to the Afghans

The U.S. should accelerate its withdrawal because only the Afghans can make their future

March 16, 2012

About Doug Bandow:

Doug Bandow is a senior fellow at the Cato Institute, specializing in foreign policy and civil liberties. A former special assistant to Ronald Reagan, he has authored multiple books and his writing appears regularly in major outlets. Bandow holds a J.D. from Stanford University.

Afghanistan is a tragedy. But it has been a tragedy for centuries. After more than a decade of attempted nation-building, the U.S. should accelerate its withdrawal. Only the Afghans can make their future.

Washington intervened in Afghanistan for a specific purpose: destroy al Qaeda and oust the Taliban for hosting anti-American terrorists. The U.S. quickly fulfilled both objectives.

The best hope for the U.S. to create a stable and peaceful Afghanistan was in 2002 and 2003. But the Bush administration was fixated on Iraq and quickly withdrew military resources from Afghanistan, promoting failure there. The Obama administration twice increased troop levels in Afghanistan in a desperate attempt to recoup lost ground.

[See pictures of Afghans mourning the recent rogue attack.]

Since then, the U.S. military has put the Taliban on the defensive and allied commanders publicly profess support for the administration's planned withdrawal in 2014. However, on a recent trip to Afghanistan I found less confidence in private. So long as the Afghan government remains corrupt and incompetent and the Taliban finds aid and sanctuary in neighboring Pakistan, the vision of a stable, peaceful Afghanistan likely will remain a chimera.

There is another, deeper problem with western attempts at nation-building in Central Asia. Afghanistan is not America or Europe, a fact highlighted by the recent deadly riots in response to the Koran burning by U.S. troops. Politicians, some allied with President Hamid Karzai, even encouraged the violence. Last year a similar mob slaughtered United Nations staffers after a Koran burning in America.

Afghanistan may eventually end up with a reasonably liberal society and effective government, but only on its own accord. There are, in fact, many Afghans, particularly women, who desire liberty and equality. However, the U.S. cannot turn Afghanistan into a modern nation-state, at least at reasonable cost in reasonable time.

It is time for the Obama administration to recognize this and stop sacrificing American lives.

[U.S., Afghan Lawmakers Clash Over Alleged Gunman's Trial.]

Washington should accelerate its troop withdrawal. Along the way there is much the U.S. should do: offer sanctuary to liberal-minded Afghans, press negotiations with the Taliban setting America's red lines (such as al Qaeda's return), and engage regional powers, including Iran, to limit the spread of conflict.

Equally important, the U.S. should learn from its failure. No more attempts at global social engineering.

There are no good options in Afghanistan. But after a decade of war in Central Asia it is time for America to leave.

Tags:
military strategy,
Obama administration,
War in Afghanistan (2001-),
Afghanistan
Other Arguments
#1
#2

Yes — The drawdown of U.S. troops should not be our only goal in Afghanistan

CAROLINE WADHAMS, Senior Fellow at the Center for American Progress

#3
#4

Yes — Neither staying the course nor doubling down on our investment offers a realistic path to success

JEFF SMITH, Kraemer Strategy Fellow and Director of the South Asia Program at the American Foreign Policy Council

#6

No — Departure from Afghanistan ought to be orderly and clearly defined

SHUJA NAWAZ, Director of the South Asia Center at the Atlantic Council

About Debate Club

A meeting of the sharpest minds on the day's most important topics, Debate Club brings in the best arguments and lets readers decide which is the most persuasive. Read the arguments, then vote. And be sure to check back often to see who has gotten the most support—and also to see what's being discussed now in the Debate Club.

Have ideas about what the Club should be debating? E-mail it to dclub@usnews.com.

You can also join the debate on Facebook or follow Debate Club on Twitter.

Advertisement
Cartoons
Thomas Jefferson Street Blog
In Marine Umbrella Incident, Republicans Still Deny Obama Is President

Umbrellagate is more proof that Obama's critics cannot acknowledge that he is, indeed, president.

Obama Isn't Nixon, but Needs More Friends in Washington

President Barack Obama needs to make more friends in Washington.

Republicans Can't Forget the Economy During Obama Scandals

Scandals provide good fodder for the GOP, but it can't forget about fixing unemployment.

Amidst Obama Scandals, Republicans Prepare a New Debt Ceiling Hostage

Republicans are preparing to take the debt ceiling hostage…again.

Benghazi, IRS and AP Scandals Reveal a Clueless President

The recent slew of scandals reveals an administration either incompetent or malicious.

The IRS Scandal Is About Budget Cuts, Not the Tea Party

Cutting the tax collection budget hurts everyone in the long-run.

Obama 'Going Bulworth' Wouldn't Give Him Power Over Republicans

Both Congress and presidents overestimate the power of the Oval Office.

Bureaucracy Keeps Adopted Children Stuck in International Limbo

The U.S. needs to do more to ease the international adoption process.

Advertisement