Debate Club

Should the U.S. Discourage Israel From Attacking Iran? >

Obama Should Pressure Iran, Not Israel

Despite sanctions, Iran shows no signs of slowing its nuclear program

March 5, 2012

About Jamie M. Fly:

Jamie Fly has served as the executive director of the Foreign Policy Initiative since its founding in early 2009. Prior to joining FPI, Fly served in the Bush administration at the National Security Council and in the Office of the Secretary of Defense. He was director for counterproliferation strategy at the National Security Council, where his portfolio included the Iranian nuclear program, Syria, missile defense, chemical weapons, proliferation finance, and other counterproliferation issues.

Speaking to The Washington Post in advance of Prime Minister Netanyahu's visit to Washington this week, an unnamed senior Obama administration official said, "We're trying to make the decision to attack as hard as possible for Israel."

This encapsulates the president's dangerously misguided policy toward one of America's closest allies. Rather than reassuring Israel in a time of growing uncertainty, the Obama administration is attempting to make life difficult for Israel's government.

The United States and Israel share an interest in ensuring that Iran does not obtain a nuclear weapons capability. But Israeli leaders, given Israel's proximity to Iran, the extreme rhetoric of Iranian leaders who have threatened Israel, and Israel's more limited military capabilities when compared to those of the United States, view the challenge posed by Iran differently than the Obama administration, which believes that we have more time to pursue a negotiated solution.

[See a collection of political cartoons on Iran.]

As the Netanyahu government decides in the coming months whether military action against Iran is necessary, Washington should not attempt to dissuade Prime Minister Netanyahu from taking action.

If Israel decides to take military action against Iran, it will be because of a lack of trust in America's willingness to act. And why should the Israelis trust President Obama to follow through on his rhetoric? During his three years in office, he has time and time again pressured Israel while reaching out to Israel's enemies.

President Obama likes to tout the economic sanctions against Iran that his administration has helped implement and the military and intelligence assistance he has provided to Israel, but the reality is that Iran has been making steady progress toward a nuclear weapons capability despite these efforts.

[See pictures of Iran participating in war games.]

The latest report of the International Atomic Energy Agency shows that Iran has the equivalent of four to five weapons-worth of fissile material if its uranium is further enriched. Despite the sanctions, Iran shows no signs of slowing its program.

Meanwhile, a series of Obama administration officials have publicly highlighted the supposed calamitous effects of a military strike rather than conveying seriousness to the mullahs in Tehran.

On the current trajectory, without U.S. or Israeli military action or regime change from within, Iran will likely obtain nuclear weapons. It will be emboldened, as will its terrorist proxies. A cascade of proliferation in one of the world's most unstable regions will likely follow. U.S. interests will be severely undermined.

It's time for President Obama to stop pressuring Israel and instead, pressure Tehran.

Tags:
nuclear weapons,
Israel,
Iran
Other Arguments
#1
#2

No — Israel cannot avoid action against Iran indefinitely

ILAN BERMAN, Vice President of the American Foreign Policy Council

#4

Yes — There is time for diplomacy and sanctions to work on Iran

BRIAN KATULIS, Senior Fellow at Center for American Progress

#5

No — Discouraging an Israeli strike on Iran undermines U.S. efforts

MICHAEL SINGH, Managing Director of The Washington Institute

#6
#7

Yes — Let's hope Israel has the good sense to refrain from hitting Iran's nuclear program

DANIEL J. GALLINGTON, Senior Policy and Program Adviser at the George C. Marshall Institute

About Debate Club

A meeting of the sharpest minds on the day's most important topics, Debate Club brings in the best arguments and lets readers decide which is the most persuasive. Read the arguments, then vote. And be sure to check back often to see who has gotten the most support—and also to see what's being discussed now in the Debate Club.

Have ideas about what the Club should be debating? E-mail it to dclub@usnews.com.

You can also join the debate on Facebook or follow Debate Club on Twitter.

Advertisement
Cartoons
Thomas Jefferson Street Blog
Oklahoma Tornado Reminds Us of the Value of Teachers

The Oklahoma tornado reminds us of all the roles teachers take on.

IRS, AP and James Rosen Scandals Strike at the First Amendment

The Obama scandals paint a picture of an administration at odds with the First Amendment.

Anthony Weiner Is Too Liberal to Be New York City Mayor

New York City doesn't need another Democratic mayor.

Organizations Masquerading as Tax-Exempt is the Real IRS Scandal

The real scandal at the IRS is electioneering groups getting tax-exempt status.

E.W. Jackson Proves the Tea Party Learned Nothing

By nominating E.W. Jackson, Virginia Republicans hope extremism will save them.

IRS, AP and Benghazi Are Not Obama Scandals

The word "scandal" doesn't appropriately describe anything going on in Washington these days.

Democrats Should Be Worried About Polls After Obama Scandals

Democrats should be more worried about President Obama's approval ratings.

Tea Party IRS Rally Should Wait Until After Moore Tornado Recovery

Tea party rallies against the IRS should wait until the tornado victims are taken care of.

Advertisement