Debate Club

Should the U.S. Discourage Israel From Attacking Iran? >

Obama Should Pressure Iran, Not Israel

Despite sanctions, Iran shows no signs of slowing its nuclear program

March 5, 2012

About Jamie M. Fly:

Jamie Fly has served as the executive director of the Foreign Policy Initiative since its founding in early 2009. Prior to joining FPI, Fly served in the Bush administration at the National Security Council and in the Office of the Secretary of Defense. He was director for counterproliferation strategy at the National Security Council, where his portfolio included the Iranian nuclear program, Syria, missile defense, chemical weapons, proliferation finance, and other counterproliferation issues.

Speaking to The Washington Post in advance of Prime Minister Netanyahu's visit to Washington this week, an unnamed senior Obama administration official said, "We're trying to make the decision to attack as hard as possible for Israel."

This encapsulates the president's dangerously misguided policy toward one of America's closest allies. Rather than reassuring Israel in a time of growing uncertainty, the Obama administration is attempting to make life difficult for Israel's government.

The United States and Israel share an interest in ensuring that Iran does not obtain a nuclear weapons capability. But Israeli leaders, given Israel's proximity to Iran, the extreme rhetoric of Iranian leaders who have threatened Israel, and Israel's more limited military capabilities when compared to those of the United States, view the challenge posed by Iran differently than the Obama administration, which believes that we have more time to pursue a negotiated solution.

[See a collection of political cartoons on Iran.]

As the Netanyahu government decides in the coming months whether military action against Iran is necessary, Washington should not attempt to dissuade Prime Minister Netanyahu from taking action.

If Israel decides to take military action against Iran, it will be because of a lack of trust in America's willingness to act. And why should the Israelis trust President Obama to follow through on his rhetoric? During his three years in office, he has time and time again pressured Israel while reaching out to Israel's enemies.

President Obama likes to tout the economic sanctions against Iran that his administration has helped implement and the military and intelligence assistance he has provided to Israel, but the reality is that Iran has been making steady progress toward a nuclear weapons capability despite these efforts.

[See pictures of Iran participating in war games.]

The latest report of the International Atomic Energy Agency shows that Iran has the equivalent of four to five weapons-worth of fissile material if its uranium is further enriched. Despite the sanctions, Iran shows no signs of slowing its program.

Meanwhile, a series of Obama administration officials have publicly highlighted the supposed calamitous effects of a military strike rather than conveying seriousness to the mullahs in Tehran.

On the current trajectory, without U.S. or Israeli military action or regime change from within, Iran will likely obtain nuclear weapons. It will be emboldened, as will its terrorist proxies. A cascade of proliferation in one of the world's most unstable regions will likely follow. U.S. interests will be severely undermined.

It's time for President Obama to stop pressuring Israel and instead, pressure Tehran.

Tags:
nuclear weapons,
Israel,
Iran
Other Arguments
#1
#2

No — Israel cannot avoid action against Iran indefinitely

ILAN BERMAN, Vice President of the American Foreign Policy Council

#4

Yes — There is time for diplomacy and sanctions to work on Iran

BRIAN KATULIS, Senior Fellow at Center for American Progress

#5

No — Discouraging an Israeli strike on Iran undermines U.S. efforts

MICHAEL SINGH, Managing Director of The Washington Institute

#6
#7

Yes — Let's hope Israel has the good sense to refrain from hitting Iran's nuclear program

DANIEL J. GALLINGTON, Senior Policy and Program Adviser at the George C. Marshall Institute

About Debate Club

A meeting of the sharpest minds on the day's most important topics, Debate Club brings in the best arguments and lets readers decide which is the most persuasive. Read the arguments, then vote. And be sure to check back often to see who has gotten the most support—and also to see what's being discussed now in the Debate Club.

Have ideas about what the Club should be debating? E-mail it to dclub@usnews.com.

You can also join the debate on Facebook or follow Debate Club on Twitter.

Advertisement
Cartoons
Thomas Jefferson Street Blog
Syria, Israel and the Obama Administration's Absentee Foreign Policy

Creating a mess you are going to leave for someone else to clean up is not a good way to manage U.S. foreign policy.

Obamacare Contraception Mandate Targets the First Amendment

Obamacare's contraception mandate threatens the free exercise of religion .

Obama Passive-Aggressive in the Face of Syria Hawks

His decision to arm Syrian rebels was a passive-aggressive one.

Spring Robins and Family Make Politics Seem Silly

Maybe those of us in political battle should spend a little more time on miracles.

Equal Employment, Criminals and BMW’s Big Problem

Preventing former criminals who have served their time from getting a job helps nobody.

Study Shows Paid Sick Days Help Contain Deadly Diseases Like Flu

GOP insistence on standing between workers and paid sick days is making us all ill.

Poll: Voters Want Results From Congress, Not Just Effort

Republicans are kidding themselves if they think voters will reward them just for trying.

Obama Praised for Leading From Behind on Immigration and Tax Reform

Congress praises Obama's low profile on immigration and tax reform.

Advertisement