Debate Club

Should the U.S. Discourage Israel From Attacking Iran? >

If America Won't Lead Against Iran, It Should Get Out of the Way

Israel cannot avoid action against Iran indefinitely

March 5, 2012

About Ilan Berman:

Ilan Berman is vice president of the American Foreign Policy Council in Washington, D.C.

These days, there is a growing sense—both within the Washington Beltway and beyond—that Israel could soon strike Iran to prevent it from going nuclear.

There is good reason to think that it will. Years of repeated efforts at "engagement" by the Obama administration have given Iran's ayatollahs precious time to add permanence to their nuclear effort. New and biting sanctions measures levied against Iran by the United States and its European allies in recent months have done little to dampen its desire for an atomic capability, at least so far. And U.S. assurances that a military option against Iran remains "on the table" ring exceedingly hollow amid growing signs of U.S. disengagement from the Middle East.

[See a collection of political cartoons on Iran.]

The weakness of Western policy, in turn, has forced hard choices upon Israel's leaders. Iran's radical regime has made no secret of its animus toward the Jewish state, or of its desire to—in the words of its firebrand president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad—"wipe Israel from the map." Iran's expanding strategic capabilities, meanwhile, make it increasingly capable of doing so. Nevertheless, Israeli policymakers have long delayed action in response, hopeful that Western pressure will eventually have concrete effect. But they cannot avoid it indefinitely.

Perhaps the clearest articulation of the Israeli calculus was provided recently by Gen. Amos Yadlin, the country's former chief of military intelligence. Writing in the New York Times last week, Yadlin (now head of the Institute for National Security Studies, one of Israel's premier think tanks) outlined that "[w]hat is needed is an ironclad American assurance that if Israel refrains from acting in its own window of opportunity—and all other options have failed to halt Tehran's nuclear quest—Washington will act to prevent a nuclear Iran while it is still within its power to do so."

[See pictures of Iran participating in war games.]

In the best of all possible worlds, the United States will be both willing and able of providing Israel with such a guarantee. Iran's nuclear program, after all, constitutes a truly global menace—one that America is best positioned to confront. But if it appears that Washington cannot or will not act against the threat, policymakers in Jerusalem may soon decide that they must. And the United States, not having led adequately in confronting the challenge from Iran, will need to follow—or get out of the way.

Tags:
Israel,
Iran,
nuclear weapons
Other Arguments
#1
#3

No — Despite sanctions, Iran shows no signs of slowing its nuclear program

JAMIE M. FLY, Former Director for Counterproliferation Strategy at the National Security Council

#4

Yes — There is time for diplomacy and sanctions to work on Iran

BRIAN KATULIS, Senior Fellow at Center for American Progress

#5

No — Discouraging an Israeli strike on Iran undermines U.S. efforts

MICHAEL SINGH, Managing Director of The Washington Institute

#6
#7

Yes — Let's hope Israel has the good sense to refrain from hitting Iran's nuclear program

DANIEL J. GALLINGTON, Senior Policy and Program Adviser at the George C. Marshall Institute

About Debate Club

A meeting of the sharpest minds on the day's most important topics, Debate Club brings in the best arguments and lets readers decide which is the most persuasive. Read the arguments, then vote. And be sure to check back often to see who has gotten the most support—and also to see what's being discussed now in the Debate Club.

Have ideas about what the Club should be debating? E-mail it to dclub@usnews.com.

You can also join the debate on Facebook or follow Debate Club on Twitter.

Advertisement
Cartoons
Thomas Jefferson Street Blog
Poll Shows Americans Find Obama's IRS Story Barely Believable

There is still something fishy about the scandal at the IRS.

Do Benghazi, AP and IRS Scandals Reflect Obama’s Leadership Style?

It may be that a flawed leadership style is filtering down to the rest of the government.

In Marine Umbrella Incident, Republicans Still Deny Obama Is President

Umbrellagate is more proof that Obama's critics cannot acknowledge that he is, indeed, president.

Obama Isn't Nixon, but Needs More Friends in Washington

President Barack Obama needs to make more friends in Washington.

Republicans Can't Forget the Economy During Obama Scandals

Scandals provide good fodder for the GOP, but it can't forget about fixing unemployment.

Amidst Obama Scandals, Republicans Prepare a New Debt Ceiling Hostage

Republicans are preparing to take the debt ceiling hostage…again.

Benghazi, IRS and AP Scandals Reveal a Clueless President

The recent slew of scandals reveals an administration either incompetent or malicious.

The IRS Scandal Is About Budget Cuts, Not the Tea Party

Cutting the tax collection budget hurts everyone in the long-run.

Advertisement