Debate Club

Should the United States Consider Military Action to Hinder Iran's Nuclear Program? >

Learn the Lessons from Iraq

The last thing U.S. needs is another war in the Muslim world

November 16, 2011

About Justin Logan:

Justin Logan is the director of foreign policy studies at the Cato Institute. He is an expert on U.S. grand strategy, international relations theory, and American foreign policy.

Over the past 10 years, America has fought in wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, and across the Arabian Peninsula. The last thing it needs today is another war in the Muslim world.

The first reason is that Iran, despite media reports, is not about to acquire a nuclear weapon. As the IAEA report indicated, there has been no diversion of fissile material from known facilities inside Iran, and without fissile material that the Iranians could enrich to the levels required for a nuclear weapon, they cannot go nuclear. Iran would need either to throw out the inspectors and divert their existing stocks or else develop very large enrichment facilities without their being detected by the outside world. Throwing out the inspectors would be easily observable, and it is unlikely that Iran has covert facilities sufficient to make it a nuclear weapons state any time soon.

[See a collection of political cartoons on Iran.]

Additionally, bombing Iran would merely delay, not stop, its nuclear program. It would also harden Iranians' belief that they need a bomb to protect themselves from the United States and Israel. The different lessons taught by Iraq and Libya on the one hand, and North Korea on the other, would become even starker. The massive bombing campaign that would be required to hit the important sites in Iran also risks rallying the Iranian population behind a regime that has been bleeding legitimacy for years. Iran's likely response could turn the entire Middle East—including Israel, Iraq, and Afghanistan—into a burbling cauldron of violence.

[See a collection of political cartoons on the turmoil in the Middle East.]

Eight years ago, the foreign-policy establishment of both the Democratic and Republican parties led the American people into a war in Iraq that has had devastating consequences for America and for the world. Many of those same elites are currently issuing calls for another war in the Middle East. Most people who bought lemons from one car dealership go elsewhere to buy their next ones. Given the much greater stakes involved in making war compared to buying a car, Americans ought to think long and hard about buying another war from the same people who brought us Iraq.

Tags:
Iran,
nuclear weapons
Other Arguments
#1

No — Engagement has failed, but supporting Iran's internal opposition is a better option than U.S. military action

ALIREZA JAFARZADEH, Author of 'The Iran Threat: President Ahmadinejad and the Coming Nuclear Crisis'

#2
#3

Yes — Iran must believe that if it tries to build a nuclear bomb, the U.S. will undertake military action to disrupt it

MICHAEL EISENSTADT, Director of the Military and Security Studies Program at The Washington Institute for Near East Policy

#4

No — Cost of military action outweighs its limited benefits

MATTHEW DUSS, Director of Middle East Progress at the Center for American Progress

#5

Yes — America cannot shirk its responsibility to stop Tehran's nuclear aims

JAMIE M. FLY, Former Director for Counterproliferation Strategy at the National Security Council

#7

No — A pre-emptive strike would make containing Iran's nuclear program harder, not easier

JAMES DOBBINS, Director of the International Security and Defense Policy Center at the RAND Corporation

Reader Comments Read all comments (4)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

You mean you do not think it is a good idea to spend a trillion dollars on a war with Iran? What planet do you live on? Do you realize the appeal that Iran has for the oppressed people of such places as Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and Palestine? If Iran is not squashed these people might rise up and object to US policies, and then where will we be? It is not the military threat that Iran represents, it is the political threat that is dangerous, so they have to be squashed and borrowing a trillion dollars from China to conduct a war against Iran seems like a sensible way to do it, if we want to spread American values across the Middle East.

JGinNJ of NJ 8:00AM December 29, 2011

You mean you do not think it is a good idea to spend a trillion dollars on a war with Iran? What planet do you live on? Do you realize the appeal that Iran has for the oppressed people of such places as Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and Palestine? If Iran is not squashed these people might rise up and object to US policies, and then where will we be? It is not the military threat that Iran represents, it is the political threat that is dangerous, so they have to be squashed and borrowing a trillion dollars from China to conduct a war against Iran seems like a sensible way to do it, if we want to spread American values across the Middle East.

JGinNJ of NJ 7:59AM December 29, 2011

I mean america can can and will destroy their nation as political eleite is ant Islam and Muslims.Iran is not afghanistan or Irak and retaliation will be strong and they will then support afghans in war against occupiers.

God bless america which will be faced withj God,s punishment what they have done to humanity at large and Pakistan ,afghanistan and Irak particularly.

ghouri of GA 5:55AM November 17, 2011

About Debate Club

A meeting of the sharpest minds on the day's most important topics, Debate Club brings in the best arguments and lets readers decide which is the most persuasive. Read the arguments, then vote. And be sure to check back often to see who has gotten the most support—and also to see what's being discussed now in the Debate Club.


Have ideas about what the Club should be debating? E-mail it to dclub@usnews.com.


You can also join the debate on Facebook or follow Debate Club on Twitter.

Advertisement
Cartoons
Thomas Jefferson Street Blog
Obama's Remarkable Silence on Latin American Press Abuses

President Obama's silence on press freedom in Latin America is troubling.

Why the Media Is Giving Romney a Pass on Trump's Birtherism

Why the media hasn't pressed Mitt Romney about Donald Trump's birther fantasies.

Romney's Bain Experience Wasn't Real American Capitalism

The fact that Bain Capital served to make money for investors, not to create jobs, could endanger Romney.

Why Is Mitt Romney Embracing Birther Donald Trump?

Maybe Trump is Romney's idea of a rich guy that common people can relate to?

Does Barack Obama Actually Want to Be Re-Elected?

The president's lack of enthusiasm jeopardizes his campaign.

3 Reasons Why the Scott Walker Wisconsin Recall Election Matters

Scott Walker is a canary in a coal mine.

The Right's Fixation With 'Vetting' Obama

American voters can use the past four years to judge Obama's qualifications as president

Voters Tuning Out Flood of 2012 Super PAC, Campaign Ads

This will be the year of grassroots voters, not Nielsen families.

Advertisement