Learn the Lessons from Iraq

By + More

Over the past 10 years, America has fought in wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, and across the Arabian Peninsula. The last thing it needs today is another war in the Muslim world.

The first reason is that Iran, despite media reports, is not about to acquire a nuclear weapon. As the IAEA report indicated, there has been no diversion of fissile material from known facilities inside Iran, and without fissile material that the Iranians could enrich to the levels required for a nuclear weapon, they cannot go nuclear. Iran would need either to throw out the inspectors and divert their existing stocks or else develop very large enrichment facilities without their being detected by the outside world. Throwing out the inspectors would be easily observable, and it is unlikely that Iran has covert facilities sufficient to make it a nuclear weapons state any time soon.

[See a collection of political cartoons on Iran.]

Additionally, bombing Iran would merely delay, not stop, its nuclear program. It would also harden Iranians' belief that they need a bomb to protect themselves from the United States and Israel. The different lessons taught by Iraq and Libya on the one hand, and North Korea on the other, would become even starker. The massive bombing campaign that would be required to hit the important sites in Iran also risks rallying the Iranian population behind a regime that has been bleeding legitimacy for years. Iran's likely response could turn the entire Middle East—including Israel, Iraq, and Afghanistan—into a burbling cauldron of violence.

[See a collection of political cartoons on the turmoil in the Middle East.]

Eight years ago, the foreign-policy establishment of both the Democratic and Republican parties led the American people into a war in Iraq that has had devastating consequences for America and for the world. Many of those same elites are currently issuing calls for another war in the Middle East. Most people who bought lemons from one car dealership go elsewhere to buy their next ones. Given the much greater stakes involved in making war compared to buying a car, Americans ought to think long and hard about buying another war from the same people who brought us Iraq.

Justin Logan

About Justin Logan Director of Foreign Policy Studies at the Cato Institute

Tags
Iran
nuclear weapons

Other Arguments

#1
209 Pts
Incite Change From Within Iran

No – Incite Change From Within Iran

Alireza Jafarzadeh Author of 'The Iran Threat: President Ahmadinejad and the Coming Nuclear Crisis'

#2
139 Pts
Let Opposition Groups Do the Hindering

No – Let Opposition Groups Do the Hindering

Raymond Tanter Founder of the Iran Policy Committee

#3
34 Pts
Only Threat of Military Action Will Stop Iran

Yes – Only Threat of Military Action Will Stop Iran

Michael Eisenstadt Director of the Military and Security Studies Program at The Washington Institute for Near East Policy

#4
12 Pts
Military Action Might Be The Only Option With Iran

Yes – Military Action Might Be The Only Option With Iran

Jamie M. Fly Former Director for Counterproliferation Strategy at the National Security Council

#5
-3 Pts
Diplomacy Best Option in Dealing with Iran's Nuclear Aims

No – Diplomacy Best Option in Dealing with Iran's Nuclear Aims

Matthew Duss Director of Middle East Progress at the Center for American Progress

#7
-64 Pts
An Attack Would Only Strengthen Iran's Influence

No – An Attack Would Only Strengthen Iran's Influence

James Dobbins Director of the International Security and Defense Policy Center at the RAND Corporation

You Might Also Like


See More