The Undue Hardship Caused by DOMA Is Unconstitutional
Constitutional liberty allows for the freedom to marry
March 26, 2013
Yes. The nation's high court has agreed to consider one of the defining civil rights issues of our time. Marriage equality touches our hearts and affects our families, and the Defense of Marriage Act case presents the Supreme Court with a monumental opportunity to affirm our common humanity and our Constitution's promises of liberty, equality and human dignity.
Loving, committed same-sex couples simply want to be treated fairly, and to be able to provide for and protect our families, just as everyone else does. Yet DOMA, as the law is called, makes this impossible by denying legally married same-sex couples vital federal protections and responsibilities available to every other married couple in this country.
This causes profound and undo hardship for thousands and thousands of families. Couples who have made a lifelong commitment to each other through marriage are being treated as strangers in the eyes of their own government. This is unconscionable, and as lower courts have deemed, unconstitutional.
America is ready for change. The transformative nature of people talking about their love and their lives is clear, as we saw with the sweeping statewide marriage victories last November, and in the fact that a clear and solid majority of Americans—from every background and walk of life—supports the freedom to marry.
But the journey is not finished, for as long as the Defense of Marriage Act remains intact, then true marriage equality remains out of reach. The clock is ticking on DOMA—it is time for the Supreme Court to strike it down, once and for all.