Debate Club

Many Time-limited Tax Breaks Never Die

By SHARE

They should, but only because the political system seems unwilling to consider better options.

The U.S. economy remains vulnerable, and with new spending off the table, the only road to fiscal stimulus is through the tax code.

But a $250 billion payroll tax holiday is a middling choice. Yes, rolling back a tax cut worth $1,000 to a typical family would be a terrible idea right now. And the expanded version would put an additional $500 in workers' pockets on average. Some Wall Street economists think economic growth would slow by a full percentage point if the tax break is allowed to expire.

[Senate Defeats Payroll Tax Cut Bill.]

Yet, because it is so badly targeted, many relatively high-income workers—who are more likely to save rather than spend some of this windfall—would benefit. And if the idea is to boost the economy by increasing demand for goods and services, giving more money to savers isn't helpful.

The Democrats' proposal also would cut Social Security taxes for employers, on the theory this will encourage more hiring. But this was tried in the Carter administration and only about 6 percent of firms that knew about the law said it prompted them to boost payrolls. And some businesses surely got a big tax windfall for hiring they would have done anyway.

Finally, keep in mind that a major cut in payroll taxes reduces funding for Social Security—a program already facing a significant long-term shortfall. Supporters of the payroll tax break insist the Social Security Trust fund would be made whole through transfers from the general fund.

[Have We Turned The Corner on Jobs?]

But the government is running a $1.4 trillion deficit, so there are no general funds to fill this hole. In effect, Congress would still have to borrow more money to make up the shortfall—and do so in a way that will only further damage Social Security's credibility.

Finally, while the payroll tax holiday is supposed to be only temporary, many time-limited tax breaks never die. And this one will be especially tough to kill.

President Obama had a better idea early in his administration—the Making Work Pay Tax Credit. It was better targeted and probably generated a much bigger employment bang for the buck. But it was never very popular politically and thus was replaced with the higher-profile payroll tax cut.

Still, for all its flaws, extending the payroll tax cut is better than nothing. It is a sad commentary on the state of our politics that better than nothing is the best we can do. But it is.

Howard Gleckman

About Howard Gleckman Resident Fellow at Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center

Tags
employment
taxes
economic growth
economy

Other Arguments

#2
54 Pts
A More Permanent Solution Is Needed

Yes – A More Permanent Solution Is Needed

Veronique de Rugy Senior Research Fellow at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University

#3
-105 Pts
Keynesian Policies Have Failed

No – Keynesian Policies Have Failed

Chris Edwards Economist at the Cato Institute

#4
-113 Pts
An Economic Loser in the Long Run

No – An Economic Loser in the Long Run

William McBride Economist at the Tax Foundation

#5
-121 Pts
A Strong Recovery Remains Elusive

Yes – A Strong Recovery Remains Elusive

Chuck Marr Director of Federal Tax Policy at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities

#7
-147 Pts
We Need to Focus on the 99 Percent

Yes – We Need to Focus on the 99 Percent

Heather Boushey Senior Economist at the Center for American Progress

You Might Also Like


See More