Debate Club

Should the Medicare Eligibility Age Be Raised? >

Raising Medicare Eligibility Will Hurt Seniors, States, and Employers

Raising the Medicare eligibility age brokers a political deal on the backs of elderly Americans

December 6, 2012

About Sy Mukherjee:

Sy Mukherjee is a health reporter for ThinkProgress

The most frustrating thing about proposals to raise the Medicare eligibility age from 65 to 67 is that those who advocate the hike take for granted that it's an oh-so-logical approach to controlling healthcare spending. "People are living longer, so isn't [the current] age sort of outmoded and isn't that a good thing to address long-term?" Fox News host Martha MacCallum pointedly asked Democratic Rep. Chris Van Hollen on her program last week.

To be fair to MacCallum, she is by no means alone in propagating this demonstrably shallow logic. Raising the Medicare eligibility age is now part of House Speaker John Boehner's "counter-offer" to President Barack Obama on the so-called "fiscal cliff," and as budget negotiations proceed, there are reports that prominent Democrats—including President Obama—have been flirting with the idea, too.

[See a collection of political cartoons on the fiscal cliff.]

But the reality is, once you delve into the mechanics and consequences of raising the Medicare age on a deeper level than "people are living longer," it becomes glaringly obvious that such a move would hurt seniors, states, and employers—all without achieving significant Medicare savings or addressing the actual roots of our healthcare cost crisis.

Let's walk through the practical implications of raising the age. First, the obvious: Implementing the eligibility hike means that seniors who retire earlier will have to wait longer to qualify for benefits. That's a pretty big deal for seniors, especially ones with spouses younger than them, since couples jointly qualify for Medicare once one party has reached the eligibility age.

[See a collection of political cartoons on healthcare.]

Next, you have to ask, where will these seniors between ages 65 and 67 go for their coverage? They could postpone retirement—but that means higher healthcare costs for their employers. They could go to Obamacare's insurance exchanges—but many seniors will have high enough incomes that they don't qualify for sufficient subsidies to get the plan they need, potentially forcing them to forgo insurance or care. Then there's the fact that shifting seniors from Medicare into the exchanges would make both of those insurance pools older, sicker, and costlier to cover, thus raising premiums for Americans in the exchanges as well as for Medicare Part B beneficiaries. And the icing on the cake? CBO says that even after all this shifting and asymmetric cost-sharing, raising the eligibility age would produce slim, nominal savings.

This is one of those policy proposals that make for a sensible-sounding pitch, but proves to be a shoddy deal on second glance. Shifting costs onto providers and people who actually need care will do nothing to address long-term trends in healthcare spending. Raising the eligibility age isn't serious entitlement reform—it's moving around some furniture and brokering a political deal on the backs of sick and elderly Americans.

Tags:
deficit and national debt,
fiscal cliff,
health care,
Medicare
Other Arguments
#1

No — Pushing up the eligibility age will hike prices across the healthcare system

DEBRA WHITMAN, AARP Executive Vice President for Policy and International

#3
#4
#5

Yes — Retirement programs must be adjusted to reflect changing demographics

JAMES CAPRETTA, Visiting Fellow at the American Enterprise Institute

#6

Yes — Raise the age of eligibility of Medicare and tie it to life span

ROBERT MOFFIT, Senior Fellow at the Heritage Foundation

Reader Comments ()

About Debate Club

A meeting of the sharpest minds on the day's most important topics, Debate Club brings in the best arguments and lets readers decide which is the most persuasive. Read the arguments, then vote. And be sure to check back often to see who has gotten the most support—and also to see what's being discussed now in the Debate Club.

Have ideas about what the Club should be debating? E-mail it to dclub@usnews.com.

You can also join the debate on Facebook or follow Debate Club on Twitter.

Advertisement
Cartoons
Thomas Jefferson Street Blog
Syria, Israel and the Obama Administration's Absentee Foreign Policy

Creating a mess you are going to leave for someone else to clean up is not a good way to manage U.S. foreign policy.

Obamacare Contraception Mandate Targets the First Amendment

Obamacare's contraception mandate threatens the free exercise of religion .

Obama Passive-Aggressive in the Face of Syria Hawks

His decision to arm Syrian rebels was a passive-aggressive one.

Spring Robins and Family Make Politics Seem Silly

Maybe those of us in political battle should spend a little more time on miracles.

Equal Employment, Criminals and BMW’s Big Problem

Preventing former criminals who have served their time from getting a job helps nobody.

Study Shows Paid Sick Days Help Contain Deadly Diseases Like Flu

GOP insistence on standing between workers and paid sick days is making us all ill.

Poll: Voters Want Results From Congress, Not Just Effort

Republicans are kidding themselves if they think voters will reward them just for trying.

Obama Praised for Leading From Behind on Immigration and Tax Reform

Congress praises Obama's low profile on immigration and tax reform.

Advertisement