Debate Club

Should the Lower Interest Rate on Stafford Loans Be Extended? >

Taxpayers on the Hook as Interest Rate Cut Drives Tuition Up

Sounds like a risky proposition for taxpayers to invest $6 billion next year for kids who can't pay back the loans

April 27, 2012

About Brian Darling:

Brian Darling is senior fellow for government studies at the Heritage Foundation.

Student loan borrowers have benefitted from a temporary interest-rate reduction on subsidized student loans for three years. Extending this "temporary" program will cost taxpayers $6 billion a year, according to the Congressional Budget Office. It will also cause more inflation in the cost of higher education.

Remember, Stafford loans are issued by the federal government with the backing of the taxpayer. Taxpayers will subsidize any reduction in loan rates. According to the AP, taxpayers are on the hook for about $870 billion in outstanding loans, but many put the figure at more than $1 trillion.

[See a collection of political cartoons on the economy.]

The Obama administration helped get us into this mess. It used legislation to take over all student loans as a means to pay for elements of Obamacare. About $9 billion was used in education savings as an accounting gimmick to pay for Obamacare in 2010. Now Americans are paying a high price for that little trick.

Unemployment has disproportionally hammered recent college graduates. As Mitt Romney has pointed out, over 50 percent of recent graduates are unemployed or underemployed. Sounds like a risky proposition for taxpayers to invest $6 billion next year for kids who can't pay back the loans.

According to Brad Plumer of the Washington Post, citing figures from the College Board, "In the past year alone, tuition for four-year public universities rose 8.3 percent for in-state students and 5.7 percent for out-of-state students. Some of those hikes are likely due to state budget cutbacks, but the same thing occurred with private colleges—a 4.5 percent tuition increase in the past year." This idea will cause tuitions to go up even further.

[Read House Votes to Maintain Low Student Loan Interest Rates.]

Institutions of higher education already receive state and federal monies for tuition, including Pell grants and tax credits, and the federal government gives grants to schools for research projects. All of this taxpayer money flowing to higher education increases costs because there is no market mechanism to keep tuition costs low.

If Republicans and Democrats in Congress hold hands to pass legislation allowing the rate to stay at the arbitrarily low 3.4 percent, expect tuition to continue to climb—and the taxpayer to continue to pay.

Tags:
Republican Party,
Obama administration,
student loans,
economy
Other Arguments
#1
#2
#3

No — Charging below-market interest rates on student loans is an inefficient way to encourage college enrollment

MATTHEW M. CHINGOS, Fellow at the Brown Center on Education Policy at the Brookings Institution

#5

No — Higher rates would encourage potential students to think a little harder about borrowing money for school

NEAL MCCLUSKEY, Associate Director of the Cato Institute's Center for Educational Freedom

About Debate Club

A meeting of the sharpest minds on the day's most important topics, Debate Club brings in the best arguments and lets readers decide which is the most persuasive. Read the arguments, then vote. And be sure to check back often to see who has gotten the most support—and also to see what's being discussed now in the Debate Club.

Have ideas about what the Club should be debating? E-mail it to dclub@usnews.com.

You can also join the debate on Facebook or follow Debate Club on Twitter.

Advertisement
Cartoons
Thomas Jefferson Street Blog
Obama Commerce Nominee Penny Pritzker’s Tax Problem

Obama’s Commerce Department nominee has some Romney-esque tax issues.

Oklahoma Tornado Reminds Us of the Value of Teachers

The Oklahoma tornado reminds us of all the roles teachers take on.

IRS, AP and James Rosen Scandals Strike at the First Amendment

The Obama scandals paint a picture of an administration at odds with the First Amendment.

Anthony Weiner Is Too Liberal to Be New York City Mayor

New York City doesn't need another Democratic mayor.

Organizations Masquerading as Tax-Exempt is the Real IRS Scandal

The real scandal at the IRS is electioneering groups getting tax-exempt status.

E.W. Jackson Proves the Tea Party Learned Nothing

By nominating E.W. Jackson, Virginia Republicans hope extremism will save them.

IRS, AP and Benghazi Are Not Obama Scandals

The word "scandal" doesn't appropriately describe anything going on in Washington these days.

Democrats Should Be Worried About Polls After Obama Scandals

Democrats should be more worried about President Obama's approval ratings.

Advertisement