Debate Club

Stafford Interest Rate Cut Does Not Help Right Away

By + More

President Obama's proposal to extend the 3.4 percent interest rate on subsidized federal loans is likely to garner support from college-age voters as well as former college students—both graduates and dropouts—currently paying off their student loans. But the type of loans affected by the president's proposal—new subsidized loans—do not accumulate interest until after students leave college. So students struggling to afford college would not get any relief now—they would just face somewhat lower loan payments down the road.

[See a collection of political cartoons on the economy.]

There is no doubt that many college students and their families are being squeezed by rising college costs. And there are good reasons for the federal government to provide financial assistance to help low-income students afford college. But charging below-market interest rates on student loans is an inefficient and likely ineffective way to encourage college enrollment and completion because students don't pay any interest until after they leave college.

[Read House Votes to Maintain Low Student Loan Interest Rates.]

Some degree of pandering to various groups of voters is to be expected in any presidential election year, so it is not surprising that likely Republican nominee Mitt Romney has thrown his support behind the interest-rate reduction. But President Obama could focus his pitch to college students on his other, more significant proposals aimed at reducing college costs. In particular, the president's proposal to provide prospective college students with much better information about institutions of higher learning—including their graduation rates and the earnings of their graduates—has the potential to force colleges to compete on quality and price rather than on amenities that drive up costs.

[Read Women May Have Tougher Time Paying Student Loan Debt Due to Gender Pay Gap.]

Even if this "College Scorecard" proposal can help drive down costs in the long run, it surely does not have the same appeal to voters as promising more money in their pockets right now. But if Obama and Romney want to buy the votes of struggling college students, they should at least propose the more efficient path of increasing the grants that students receive when they attend college, not decreasing the interest they pay after they leave.

Matthew M. Chingos

About Matthew M. Chingos Fellow at the Brown Center on Education Policy at the Brookings Institution

Tags
economy
Obama administration
Republican Party
student loans

Other Arguments

#1
42 Pts
We Must Protect Families from Exorbitant Loan Rates

Yes – We Must Protect Families from Exorbitant Loan Rates

Gary Peters Member of the U.S. House of Representatives

#2
16 Pts
Private Loans Without Bankruptcy Option Are the Real Problem

No – Private Loans Without Bankruptcy Option Are the Real Problem

Amy Laitinen Senior Policy Analyst at Education Sector

#4
-19 Pts
Taxpayers on the Hook as Interest Rate Cut Drives Tuition Up

No – Taxpayers on the Hook as Interest Rate Cut Drives Tuition Up

Brian Darling Senior Fellow for Government Studies at the Heritage Foundation

#5
-22 Pts
Let Student Loan Interest Rates Rise

No – Let Student Loan Interest Rates Rise

Neal McCluskey Associate Director of the Cato Institute's Center for Educational Freedom

You Might Also Like


See More