Debate Club

Should the Government Invest in Green Energy? >

Subsidies for Green Energy Do Not Help American Consumers

Uncle Sam is a lousy investor and a terrible venture capitalist

January 18, 2012

About Daniel Kish:

Dan Kish is a senior vice president for policy at the Institute for Energy Research. Kish has more than 25 years of experience on congressional committees focused principally upon of natural resource and energy policies.

Politicians are learning what the American people have known for years: Uncle Sam is a pretty lousy investor and a terrible venture capitalist. In recent months, the evidence has mounted. From Solyndra to Soperton, the federal government has pumped billions of taxpayer dollars into countless "green energy" companies.

Simply, the government should not be picking winners and losers. No source of energy requiring heavy government subsidies or that government forces you to buy should receive taxpayer money. In the end, the government is hurting the American people.

[See a collection of political cartoons on energy policy.]

The game goes like this: The government taxes the American worker, and then takes a portion of those tax dollars and gives it to Solyndra or another favored political ally of whomever has power in Washington. Then it forces the utilities to buy the energy. Taxpayers' money is needed to keep the apparent energy costs from the green sources down because if the real cost were paid directly by consumers on their monthly electric bills or at the gas pump, they would revolt.

In fact, if development of these sources made any economic sense, private sector job creators would be lining up to do it. Case in point: Look at what has happened with the shale energy revolution in places like Pennsylvania and North Dakota. When energy is affordable and technology is available, Americans will unleash the power of innovation and risk their own capital to develop any source. In fact, 1 in 5 new jobs created since 2003 has been oil- and natural gas-related.

But with green energy, firms need Uncle Sam to ensure their profit. Since 2007, total federal energy subsidies increased from $17.9 billion to $37.2 billion. Seventy-seven percent of that increase is due to the Obama administration's stimulus. Renewable subsidies increased 186 percent, led by wind energy, which received a 10-fold increase to nearly $5 billion. None of this, by the way, has kept energy prices down. Electricity prices have increased by 23 percent in the last five years.

[Check out the U.S. News Energy Intelligence blog.]

Meanwhile, the government is rigging the game through mandates that force American consumers to buy green energy sources to meet the requirements of the law. Currently, 29 states have green energy mandates that require a certain percentage of the states' electricity to be generated from these sources. Among states with renewable mandates, consumers pay on average 38 percent more for electricity.

The evidence is clear: Federal subsidies for green energy sources do not help American consumers or ensure the economic viability of green energy companies like Solyndra that can't turn a profit even with half a billion dollars in taxpayer money.

 

Tags:
energy
Other Arguments
#1
#2

Yes — Green energy investments pay off in the long run

CHRISTOPH STEFES, Professor at University of Colorado, Denver

#4
#5

Yes — Research, development are key to solving U.S. energy needs

MAUREEN RENO, Energy Economist at the Union of Concerned Scientists

#6
#7
#8

Yes — Forget Solyndra: Conventional fuels get more handouts than clean energy does

ERIC POOLEY, Vice President for Strategy and Communications at the Environmental Defense Fund

About Debate Club

A meeting of the sharpest minds on the day's most important topics, Debate Club brings in the best arguments and lets readers decide which is the most persuasive. Read the arguments, then vote. And be sure to check back often to see who has gotten the most support—and also to see what's being discussed now in the Debate Club.

Have ideas about what the Club should be debating? E-mail it to dclub@usnews.com.

You can also join the debate on Facebook or follow Debate Club on Twitter.

Advertisement
Cartoons
Thomas Jefferson Street Blog
Obamacare Opponents Have to Keep Pushing Repeal

The way to repeal Obamacare is to hasten its ugly results.

Can Obama's Berlin Speech Match John F. Kennedy's and Ronald Reagan's?

The two famous Berlin speeches almost never were.

Reform Conservatives Need to Tackle Unemployment and Jobs

"Reform conservatives" are doing good work, but need to think about the ills of long-term unemployment.

If Background Checks are Good Enough for Guns, They're Good Enough for Jobs

Employers need to be able to consider all factors before making a hire.

NSA Leaker Edward Snowden Is Neither a Whistle-Blower Nor a Civil Disobeyer

Resisters who break a law must accept that they may be arrested and have a duty to submit to punishment.

Obama Should Bring Small Business Owners on His Trip to Africa

This country needs a national reality show.

Russian President Vladimir Putin’s Divorce and Robert Kraft’s Super Bowl Ring

What took Lyudmila Putina so long?

Syria, Israel and the Obama Administration's Absentee Foreign Policy

Creating a mess you are going to leave for someone else to clean up is not a good way to manage U.S. foreign policy.

Advertisement