Debate Club

Should the Government Invest in Green Energy? >

Green Energy Dramatically Benefits the Nation

Research, development are key to solving U.S. energy needs

January 18, 2012

About Maureen Reno:

Maureen L. Reno is an energy economist at the Union of Concerned Scientists, where she designs and evaluates various energy policies at the state, regional, and national levels to maximize economic benefits and overcome market barriers to renewable energy. She has over a decade of experience in the regulated utility and renewable energy sectors. Reno has an M.A. in economics from the University of New Hampshire's Whittemore School of Business and Economics.

The United States government must continue to invest in renewable energy by supporting research and development and by adopting other long-term policies that are needed to overcome key market barriers and capture important economic, environmental, and public health benefits that are not currently priced in the market. These policies would also help create new competitors to established energy industries that have received decades of subsidies, and generally continue to receive them.

Federal lawmakers must not let budget negotiators pull the plug on federal renewable energy policies that have created high-paying jobs and increased local tax revenues. For instance, the Federal 1603 Treasury grant program, which was allowed to expire last year, and the production tax credit (PTC) for wind power, which if not renewed will expire at the end of 2012, have been extremely effective policies, generating tens of billion dollars of investment in rural communities and creating new wind manufacturing and construction jobs during the economic recession. A recent report completed by Navigant Consulting finds that 37,000 American jobs could be lost in the wind industry if Congress allows the PTC for wind to expire.

[See a collection of political cartoons on energy policy.]

The federal government should also continue to support emerging clean energy technologies, as it is doing through the Department of Energy's Advanced Research Project Agency-Energy (ARPA-E) programs that explore creative "outside-the-box" technologies that promise genuine transformation in the ways we generate, store, and utilize energy. ARPA-E funds high-risk, high-reward concepts that industry alone cannot support, but whose success would dramatically benefit the nation.

Federal policies, combined with renewable electricity standards adopted by 29 states and growth in the international market, have been also effective in lowering the cost of wind, solar, and other renewable energy technologies. For example, the cost of solar power has declined by about 50 percent in the past few years. The cost of wind has fallen by about 33 percent, according Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, making it cheaper than building a new coal plant and cost competitive with new natural gas plants in areas with high-quality winds.

[Check out the U.S. News Energy Intelligence blog.]

America should also establish a national renewable electricity standard to rebuild the country's aging energy infrastructure, stabilize energy prices, and lessen the severity of climate change and the impacts it will have on public health. As part of this strategy, the government must support aggressive research and development of sustainable energy technologies and deploy more wind, solar, geothermal, and sustainable sources of low-carbon bioenergy, and greatly increase the energy efficiency of our nation's economy. Ramping up national reliance on clean energy technologies will allow the United States to remain a leader in the global clean energy marketplace by developing innovative solutions and creating new industries. Such a sustainable energy strategy will also bolster our economy, preserve our natural resources, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and reduce our long-term energy costs.

Tags:
renewable energy,
energy
Other Arguments
#1
#2

Yes — Green energy investments pay off in the long run

CHRISTOPH STEFES, Professor at University of Colorado, Denver

#3
#3

No — Uncle Sam is a lousy investor and a terrible venture capitalist

DANIEL KISH, Senior Vice President for Policy at the Institute for Energy Research

#6
#7
#8

Yes — Forget Solyndra: Conventional fuels get more handouts than clean energy does

ERIC POOLEY, Vice President for Strategy and Communications at the Environmental Defense Fund

About Debate Club

A meeting of the sharpest minds on the day's most important topics, Debate Club brings in the best arguments and lets readers decide which is the most persuasive. Read the arguments, then vote. And be sure to check back often to see who has gotten the most support—and also to see what's being discussed now in the Debate Club.

Have ideas about what the Club should be debating? E-mail it to dclub@usnews.com.

You can also join the debate on Facebook or follow Debate Club on Twitter.

Advertisement
Cartoons
Thomas Jefferson Street Blog
E.W. Jackson Proves the Tea Party Learned Nothing

By nominating E.W. Jackson, Virginia Republicans hope extremism will save them.

IRS, AP and Benghazi Are Not Obama Scandals

The word "scandal" doesn't appropriately describe anything going on in Washington these days.

Democrats Should Be Worried About Polls After Obama Scandals

Democrats should be more worried about President Obama's approval ratings.

Tea Party IRS Rally Should Wait Until After Moore Tornado Recovery

Tea party rallies against the IRS should wait until the tornado victims are taken care of.

God Bless America and the Boy Scouts

The Fund does the right thing by pushing the Boy Scouts to lift its ban on gay members.

IRS, AP and Benghazi Show the Failure of Obama's Big Government

Giving an inefficient organization like the IRS more responsibility makes it more likely to screw up, not better able to solve this nation’s problems.

Coburn Wants Oklahoma Tornado Aid Offset With Budget Cuts

Oklahoma Senator Tom Coburn wants spending cuts before aid is sent to tornado victims in his own state.

Crowdfunding Zack Braff's Film And Robert Griffin's Gifts Is a Mistake

Rich people don't need donations from the public.

Advertisement