Debate Club

Should the Government Help Homeowners With Underwater Mortgages? >

Cost of More Foreclosures to the Economy Is Too High

Government should lead the way on right-sizing underwater mortgages

February 6, 2012

About Ethan Handelman:

Ethan Handelman is vice president for policy and advocacy at the National Housing Conference, where he directs NHC's agenda focused on stemming the foreclosure crisis, strengthening the nation's housing finance system, improving the coordination of housing, transportation, and energy policy and assisting low- and moderate-income families through a stronger, balanced housing policy.

American families have too much mortgage debt weighing them down—for many it is unsustainable, particularly those with underwater mortgages, where the debt is greater than their home's value. Resolving underwater mortgages is essential to keep families in their homes, restore housing markets, and encourage economic recovery.

There are many ways to act:

  • Federal and state governments have been helping low- and moderate-income families with home repair and debt reduction for over 30 years—we could allocate (admittedly scarce) resources to more direct assistance.
  • Private lenders have begun helping many homeowners by modifying mortgages, some encouraged by federal incentives, some because they recognize it is in their best interest. We could increase incentives (as proposed by the president) and push more lenders to reduce principal at little cost to government.
  • Homeowners and lenders can share the cost, making both better off. Shared appreciation mortgages replace the original too-big mortgage with a smaller, sustainable first mortgage plus a second loan that allows the lender and the homeowner to share the costs and benefits of restructuring. Shared appreciation costs government nothing, and one servicer has been using it to great result for years. We could encourage much wider use via regulations, the market power of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, or targeted financial incentives.

[Check out the U.S. News housing blog The Home Front.]

If we do not act, the consequences will be severe. More foreclosures will weaken neighborhoods and disrupt struggling families. Some households will remain trapped, missing out on better jobs elsewhere, waiting for inflation and monthly payments to slowly grind away the debt. Underwater loans keep people from selling their homes, even if they would be better off moving elsewhere for a job, to be closer to family, or to make room for kids. With few homes bought and sold, it will remain harder for everyone to know what the right price of a home is, and therefore harder to restore the confidence that homes purchased today will retain their value. Until we restore that confidence, we cannot hope for a full economic recovery.

There are many homeowners who took out reasonable mortgages for homes at the going price, made their payments, but got trapped in underwater loans by the bursting housing bubble. Right-sizing mortgages can help those responsible households get above water more quickly. It can provide better returns to lenders by preventing costly defaults and foreclosures. It will also help housing markets recover. Government should lead the way, but it need not foot the entire bill.

Tags:
housing market,
housing,
mortgages
Other Arguments
#1

No — Obama's housing plan is a political trick that carries little economic impact

ANTHONY SANDERS, Real Estate Finance Professor at George Mason University

#2

No — Rewriting mortgages punishes lenders while doing little for the economy

MARK CALABRIA, Director of Financial Regulation Studies at the Cato Institute

#3

Yes — Restoring the housing market is key to the economic recovery

PETER TATIAN, Senior Research Associate in the Urban Institute's Metropolitan Housing and Communities Policy Center

#5

Yes — Those who did not walk away from obligations are worthy of government thanks, and help

RAPHAEL BOSTIC, Assistant Secretary for Policy Development and Research at the Department of Housing and Urban Development

About Debate Club

A meeting of the sharpest minds on the day's most important topics, Debate Club brings in the best arguments and lets readers decide which is the most persuasive. Read the arguments, then vote. And be sure to check back often to see who has gotten the most support—and also to see what's being discussed now in the Debate Club.

Have ideas about what the Club should be debating? E-mail it to dclub@usnews.com.

You can also join the debate on Facebook or follow Debate Club on Twitter.

Advertisement
Cartoons
Thomas Jefferson Street Blog
President Obama's Code Pink Heckler Medea Benjamin Was Plain Rude

It's become acceptable for people to interrupt the president while he is delivering a formal speech on a deadly serious topic.

Obama Commerce Nominee Penny Pritzker’s Tax Problem

Obama’s Commerce Department nominee has some Romney-esque tax issues.

Oklahoma Tornado Reminds Us of the Value of Teachers

The Oklahoma tornado reminds us of all the roles teachers take on.

IRS, AP and James Rosen Scandals Strike at the First Amendment

The Obama scandals paint a picture of an administration at odds with the First Amendment.

Anthony Weiner Is Too Liberal to Be New York City Mayor

New York City doesn't need another Democratic mayor.

Organizations Masquerading as Tax-Exempt is the Real IRS Scandal

The real scandal at the IRS is electioneering groups getting tax-exempt status.

E.W. Jackson Proves the Tea Party Learned Nothing

By nominating E.W. Jackson, Virginia Republicans hope extremism will save them.

IRS, AP and Benghazi Are Not Obama Scandals

The word "scandal" doesn't appropriately describe anything going on in Washington these days.

Advertisement