Debate Club

Should the Dodd-Frank Act Be Repealed? >

Repealing Dodd-Frank Would Put the Economy in Danger

Wall Street Reform laid a foundation for financial stability

October 17, 2011

About Tim Johnson:

Sen. Tim Johnson is the U.S. senator from South Dakota. He is the chairman of the Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee and serves on several other important committees, including the Appropriations Committee; the Energy and Natural Resources Committee and the Indian Affairs Committee. Before being elected senator in 1996, he served five terms in Congress.

It was only a few years ago that our economy was hit by a financial crisis created by reckless behavior on Wall Street and a lack of consumer protection. It is shocking how quickly some in Washington have forgotten the painful consequences of inadequate regulation—though the millions of Americans who lost their jobs, homes, or retirement savings surely have not.

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act created a sound regulatory foundation to protect consumers, rein in excessive risk taking on Wall Street, and put an end to "too-big-to-fail" bailouts. The idea that we should return to the rules that were in place before the financial crisis would be laughable if it were not being proposed by Republicans in Congress.

[See photos of the Occupy Wall Street protests.]

Repealing Dodd-Frank would eliminate the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, giving a free pass to the subprime mortgage lenders who duped millions of Americans into predatory loans that ended in foreclosure. Opponents of the new consumer agency are apparently more concerned with protecting their friends on Wall Street than protecting families buying homes, students borrowing for college, or servicemembers falling prey to financial scams.

Repealing Dodd-Frank would put the entire economy in danger, by taking away the financial regulators' ability to deal with future crises. Lehman Brothers and AIG demonstrated how dangerous the failure of a single financial firm can be to the larger economy—and thus big banks are now required to prepare plans showing how they can be dismantled in an orderly fashion. And if an individual firm does fail, it will not be rescued. Instead, the FDIC will wind it down safely and at no cost to the taxpayer. A repeal would let the banks off the hook, make another AIG bailout possible, and stick American taxpayers with the tab.

[Check out a roundup of editorial cartoons on the economy.]

Critics say the Wall Street Reform Act is too expensive, but ignore the trillions of dollars our nation lost because of inadequate regulation. They claim, without a shred of evidence, that repealing the law would somehow create jobs, apparently having forgotten the millions of Americans who are still unemployed because the old rules weren't strong enough. Efforts to tear down Dodd-Frank and return to the failed policies of the past are misguided, irresponsible, and dangerous.

Tags:
Wall Street
Other Arguments
#2

Yes — Some parts of Dodd-Frank should be repealed

JAMES ANGEL, Professor at Georgetown University

#3

Yes — We should repeal Dodd-Frank and start over

DAVID JOHN, Fellow at the Heritage Foundation

#4
#5

No — If anything, they Dodd-Frank Act should have been stronger

DEAN BAKER, Author of 'The End of Loser Liberalism: Making Markets Progressive'

About Debate Club

A meeting of the sharpest minds on the day's most important topics, Debate Club brings in the best arguments and lets readers decide which is the most persuasive. Read the arguments, then vote. And be sure to check back often to see who has gotten the most support—and also to see what's being discussed now in the Debate Club.

Have ideas about what the Club should be debating? E-mail it to dclub@usnews.com.

You can also join the debate on Facebook or follow Debate Club on Twitter.

Advertisement
Cartoons
Thomas Jefferson Street Blog
Poll Shows Americans Find Obama's IRS Story Barely Believable

There is still something fishy about the scandal at the IRS.

Do Benghazi, AP and IRS Scandals Reflect Obama’s Leadership Style?

It may be that a flawed leadership style is filtering down to the rest of the government.

In Marine Umbrella Incident, Republicans Still Deny Obama Is President

Umbrellagate is more proof that Obama's critics cannot acknowledge that he is, indeed, president.

Obama Isn't Nixon, but Needs More Friends in Washington

President Barack Obama needs to make more friends in Washington.

Republicans Can't Forget the Economy During Obama Scandals

Scandals provide good fodder for the GOP, but it can't forget about fixing unemployment.

Amidst Obama Scandals, Republicans Prepare a New Debt Ceiling Hostage

Republicans are preparing to take the debt ceiling hostage…again.

Benghazi, IRS and AP Scandals Reveal a Clueless President

The recent slew of scandals reveals an administration either incompetent or malicious.

The IRS Scandal Is About Budget Cuts, Not the Tea Party

Cutting the tax collection budget hurts everyone in the long-run.

Advertisement