Should the Congress Pass CISPA? >
CISPA Is a Model of Bipartisan Legislating
CISPA protects America's greatest resource—its ideas
April 18, 2012
In Washington, there are two ways to quickly determine whether a piece of legislation is balanced and fair: One is when the concessions in a bill reach a tipping-point and become poison pills for all parties. The other is when the measure has both wide-ranging bipartisan and industry support. CISPA—the Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act—falls comfortably in the latter category.
Passed out of the House Intelligence Committee with an overwhelming vote of 17-1, it is refreshing to see that common sense measures in our country—at least in matters of national security—can still be bipartisan. This legislation, authored by the Intelligence Committee's Republican chairman, Michigan Republican Rep. Mike Rogers, and the panel's Ranking democrat, Maryland Democratic Rep. Dutch Ruppersberger, goes out of its way to protect not only our country, but our privacy, as well.
[Read the U.S. News debate: Should Congress Pass Anti-Online Piracy Legislation?]
Among other things, the bill sets a sound precedent for future collaboration by ensuring that any proprietary information volunteered to security agencies will not be compromised and that the private data it is afforded—all of which is offered voluntarily—will not be inappropriately searched or utilized. CISPA does not contains "kill switches," mandates, or sanctions—it sets up the means for responsible data collaboration between the public and private sector in secure environments to the benefit of all parties.
More than anything, though, CISPA gives us the tools and resources needed to defend ourselves in cyberspace, which has become the invisible battleground of the 21st century—a battleground where America's adversaries are working to not only sabotage our critical infrastructure, but steal one of our greatest resources: our ideas and ingenuity.
[Read: Civil Liberties Organizations Launch Protests Against CISPA]
As Chairman Rogers said at a recent policy breakfast hosted by the Ripon Society, "There are two companies left in America—those that have been hacked and know it, and those that have been hacked and don't know it."
CISPA is a good first step toward protecting American companies and individuals from this threat, and is something both Republicans and Democrats should support.
- Join the debate on Facebook.
- Follow U.S. News Debate Club on Twitter.
- Check out U.S. News Weekly: an insider's guide to politics and policy.
- Other Arguments
-
#121521
No — CISPA will unnecessarily undermine decades of bedrock privacy law
RAINEY REITMAN, Activism Director for the Electronic Frontier Foundation
-
#219022
No — CISPA presents a false choice between network security and Internet users' rights
KENDALL BURMAN, Senior National Security Fellow at the Center for Democracy & Technology
-
#316019
No — CISPA's most current draft does not come close to addressing the civil liberties threats posed by the bill
SHARON BRADFORD FRANKLIN, Senior Counsel at the Constitution Project
-
#447162
Yes — To improve U.S. cybersecurity, let's pass CISPA
MATTHEW EGGERS, Senior Director of National Security and Emergency Preparedness for the U.S. Chamber of Commerce
-
#633159
Yes — CISPA represents the best, most flexible, and effective approach to developing a more robust and responsive cybersecurity infrastructure
CORDELL CARTER, Vice President of the Business Roundtable.
-
#722152
Yes — CISPA allows the government and private sector to defend America against these cyberattacks, writes the Intelligence Committee chairman
MIKE ROGERS, Chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence
