Should Sugar Be Regulated? >
Consumers Need to Be Empowered, Not Made Into Victims
Waiting for sugar regulation will not solve the problem
March 30, 2012
About Keith T. Ayoob:
For the past 28 years Keith T. Ayoob has been director of the Nutrition Clinic at the Rose F. Kennedy Children's Evaluation and Rehabilitation Center at Yeshiva University's Albert Einstein College of Medicine. He is on numerous advisory boards related to adult and child nutrition and much of his work focuses on eating behavior and family dynamics.
The idea of regulating sugar was proposed recently by several researchers from the University of California who cited studies suggesting that sugar was "associated with" (not the same as "has caused") a rise in conditions such as diabetes and heart disease.
As a practitioner, I share their frustration about the obesity epidemic, but regulating sugar puts us on a very slippery slope.
What if we used health to justify government control over other aspects of diet and lifestyle:
- Banning restaurants from serving more than two drinks to a man or one drink to a woman? More than that is considered excessive by the government. Forget splitting a bottle of wine at dinner.
- Limiting foods sold in bakeries or on restaurant menus if they're high in fat, salt or sugar?
- Regulating the type and number of new products coming onto the market, because of their nutritional content.
- Banning TV cooking shows that show dishes with too much fat, salt, or sugar.
Sugar isn't new. It's been around forever and the USDA says that we actually ate less of it in 2010 than we did in 2009. Schools do regulate it and that's fine. And don't forget the other lifestyle changes that used to keep sugar intake in check, like how our activity levels have declined over the years. Foods with sugar don't make us sick. The decisions we make about those foods and our lifestyles do.
Regulating sugar just reinforces that consumers are "victims," and I can't go there. Being a victim means two things:
- You're not responsible for your situation and
- Some other person or entity should fix the problem.
That's blame, and blame causes stagnation, not action. People don't come to me to be told they're victims--they come to me for solutions. Waiting for legislation that forces dietary changes is a luxury I don't have. It's my job to empower my patients and help them take matters into their own hands. Part of any empowerment process means owning up to what's really happening and accepting some responsibility for what we do. That's not a burden, it's liberating. It puts consumers are back in control, without waiting for legislation.
Finally, one piece of legislation I'd like to see? Require food labels to list the grams of added sugars. That would be a great tool for informing and empowering consumers' decisions.
- Join the debate on Facebook.
- Follow U.S. News Debate Club on Twitter.
- Check out U.S. News Weekly: an insider's guide to politics and policy.
- Other Arguments
-
#110340
No — High sugar taxes are at best unsuccessful, and at worst economically and socially harmful
PATRICK BASHAM, Co-author of 'Diet Nation: Exposing the Obesity Crusade'
-
#39140
No — Freedom for taxpayers and consumers is the answer, not more taxes and regulations
ART CARDEN, Assistant Professor of Economics at Rhodes College.
-
#48281
Yes — Legislators should make policy that allows the price of food to match up more closely with its actual health costs
KRISTINA LEWIS, Doctor and Researcher at the Obesity Prevention Program at Harvard Medical School
-
#53473
Yes — Food manufacturers should be required to group all sugars under one designation
MARION NESTLE, Co-author of 'Why Calories Count: From Science to Politics'
-
#63980
Yes — Sugar needs to be regulated like other toxic and addictive substances
LAURA SCHMIDT, Professor of Health Policy at the University of California-San Francisco
-
#73476
Yes — The time may have come for the FDA to gradually ratchet down the amount of sugar that pours into the food supply
MICHAEL JACOBSON, Executive Director of the Center for Science in the Public Interest
