Debate Club

Should States Be Able to Collect Sales Tax on Goods Sold Online? >

Jim DeMint: Online Sales Tax is Taxation Without Representation

A nationally-mandated Internet tax is anything but fair

August 8, 2012

About Jim DeMint:

Jim DeMint is a Republican senator from South Carolina.

States may already collect "use taxes" from residents who buy products from other states, online or otherwise, yet most rarely enforce them. So instead of raising taxes on their own voters, they want their allies in Washington to pass a new law that would allow state politicians to tax people who could never vote against them: out-of-state business owners.

Our nation was founded on the idea that a citizen has taxation with representation and the online sales tax on businesses destroys that tradition entirely.

[See a collection of political cartoons on the economy.]

If a bill such as the Marketplace Fairness Act became law, online businesses could be mandated to pay sales taxes to any state where they mail a product, even if it's a state in which neither the seller nor the buyer resides. So a retailer in the no-sales tax state of New Hampshire would be forced to pay California sales taxes every time they mailed a product to California, even if the buyer lived in Florida.

Brick and mortar stores have never been required to do anything like this. When a customer enters one of those stores, the shop owner only charges the same local and state sales tax at the register. Bizarrely, the Marketplace Fairness Act would require online retailers to keep track of more than 10,000 different mind-boggling state and local tax jurisdictions around the country.

The Marketplace Fairness Act's authors admit the costly burdens it would force on small businesses by exempting companies with less than $500,000 in annual sales. But that is a very low threshold to cross and will likely discourage businesses from growing. And, what happens if a small business owner makes a mistake calculating those taxes? They could suddenly be audited by numerous states where they have no political recourse.

[Read the U.S. News debate: Is a Flat Tax a Good Idea?]

So, who truly wants this legislation to pass? Not consumers who would pay more for goods. Certainly not small online retailers who can't afford armies of tech support staff and accountants to help them navigate these rules.

Those supporting this new Internet tax are the ones who stand to gain from it: politicians who want more taxes and large, national retailers who are already subject to multiple state taxes and see an opportunity to squeeze their online competition in the name of "fairness."

If states want more taxes, they can raise taxes on their residents, but it's antithetical to our federalist system to let states raise taxes on out-of-state residents.

Call this legislation what it is: A nationally-mandated Internet tax on small business. It's anything but fair.

Tags:
Jim DeMint,
sales tax,
shopping,
internet,
business
Other Arguments
#1
#3

No — There are better ways to tax Internet companies while encouraging interstate economic competition

ADAM THIERER, Senior Research Fellow for the Mercatus Center at George Mason University

#4

No — Online sales tax could open a Pandora's box of overzealous collection efforts

ANDREW MOYLAN, Vice President of Government Affairs for the National Taxpayers Union

#5

No — Internet sales tax can do a great deal more economic harm than good.

NEIL NIMAN, Associate Professor of Economics at the University of New Hampshire

#6
#7

No — States already collect most online sales tax

STEVE DELBIANCO, Executive Director of NetChoice

#8

Yes — Internet businesses should live by the same rules as "mom and pop" stores on Main Street

MICHAEL MAZEROV, Senior Fellow at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.

#9

Yes — Online-only retailers are exempt from collecting sales tax at every point of purchase

MICHAEL KERCHEVAL, President of the International Council of Shopping Centers

About Debate Club

A meeting of the sharpest minds on the day's most important topics, Debate Club brings in the best arguments and lets readers decide which is the most persuasive. Read the arguments, then vote. And be sure to check back often to see who has gotten the most support—and also to see what's being discussed now in the Debate Club.

Have ideas about what the Club should be debating? E-mail it to dclub@usnews.com.

You can also join the debate on Facebook or follow Debate Club on Twitter.

Advertisement
Cartoons
Thomas Jefferson Street Blog
President Obama's Code Pink Heckler Medea Benjamin Was Plain Rude

It's become acceptable for people to interrupt the president while he is delivering a formal speech on a deadly serious topic.

Obama Commerce Nominee Penny Pritzker’s Tax Problem

Obama’s Commerce Department nominee has some Romney-esque tax issues.

Oklahoma Tornado Reminds Us of the Value of Teachers

The Oklahoma tornado reminds us of all the roles teachers take on.

IRS, AP and James Rosen Scandals Strike at the First Amendment

The Obama scandals paint a picture of an administration at odds with the First Amendment.

Anthony Weiner Is Too Liberal to Be New York City Mayor

New York City doesn't need another Democratic mayor.

Organizations Masquerading as Tax-Exempt is the Real IRS Scandal

The real scandal at the IRS is electioneering groups getting tax-exempt status.

E.W. Jackson Proves the Tea Party Learned Nothing

By nominating E.W. Jackson, Virginia Republicans hope extremism will save them.

IRS, AP and Benghazi Are Not Obama Scandals

The word "scandal" doesn't appropriately describe anything going on in Washington these days.

Advertisement