Debate Club

Should States Be Able to Collect Sales Tax on Goods Sold Online? >

Jim DeMint: Online Sales Tax is Taxation Without Representation

A nationally-mandated Internet tax is anything but fair

August 8, 2012

About Jim DeMint:

Jim DeMint is a Republican senator from South Carolina.

States may already collect "use taxes" from residents who buy products from other states, online or otherwise, yet most rarely enforce them. So instead of raising taxes on their own voters, they want their allies in Washington to pass a new law that would allow state politicians to tax people who could never vote against them: out-of-state business owners.

Our nation was founded on the idea that a citizen has taxation with representation and the online sales tax on businesses destroys that tradition entirely.

[See a collection of political cartoons on the economy.]

If a bill such as the Marketplace Fairness Act became law, online businesses could be mandated to pay sales taxes to any state where they mail a product, even if it's a state in which neither the seller nor the buyer resides. So a retailer in the no-sales tax state of New Hampshire would be forced to pay California sales taxes every time they mailed a product to California, even if the buyer lived in Florida.

Brick and mortar stores have never been required to do anything like this. When a customer enters one of those stores, the shop owner only charges the same local and state sales tax at the register. Bizarrely, the Marketplace Fairness Act would require online retailers to keep track of more than 10,000 different mind-boggling state and local tax jurisdictions around the country.

The Marketplace Fairness Act's authors admit the costly burdens it would force on small businesses by exempting companies with less than $500,000 in annual sales. But that is a very low threshold to cross and will likely discourage businesses from growing. And, what happens if a small business owner makes a mistake calculating those taxes? They could suddenly be audited by numerous states where they have no political recourse.

[Read the U.S. News debate: Is a Flat Tax a Good Idea?]

So, who truly wants this legislation to pass? Not consumers who would pay more for goods. Certainly not small online retailers who can't afford armies of tech support staff and accountants to help them navigate these rules.

Those supporting this new Internet tax are the ones who stand to gain from it: politicians who want more taxes and large, national retailers who are already subject to multiple state taxes and see an opportunity to squeeze their online competition in the name of "fairness."

If states want more taxes, they can raise taxes on their residents, but it's antithetical to our federalist system to let states raise taxes on out-of-state residents.

Call this legislation what it is: A nationally-mandated Internet tax on small business. It's anything but fair.

Tags:
Jim DeMint,
sales tax,
shopping,
internet,
business
Other Arguments
#1
#3

No — There are better ways to tax Internet companies while encouraging interstate economic competition

ADAM THIERER, Senior Research Fellow for the Mercatus Center at George Mason University

#4

No — Online sales tax could open a Pandora's box of overzealous collection efforts

ANDREW MOYLAN, Vice President of Government Affairs for the National Taxpayers Union

#5

No — Internet sales tax can do a great deal more economic harm than good.

NEIL NIMAN, Associate Professor of Economics at the University of New Hampshire

#6
#7

No — States already collect most online sales tax

STEVE DELBIANCO, Executive Director of NetChoice

#8

Yes — Internet businesses should live by the same rules as "mom and pop" stores on Main Street

MICHAEL MAZEROV, Senior Fellow at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.

#9

Yes — Online-only retailers are exempt from collecting sales tax at every point of purchase

MICHAEL KERCHEVAL, President of the International Council of Shopping Centers

About Debate Club

A meeting of the sharpest minds on the day's most important topics, Debate Club brings in the best arguments and lets readers decide which is the most persuasive. Read the arguments, then vote. And be sure to check back often to see who has gotten the most support—and also to see what's being discussed now in the Debate Club.

Have ideas about what the Club should be debating? E-mail it to dclub@usnews.com.

You can also join the debate on Facebook or follow Debate Club on Twitter.

Advertisement
Cartoons
Thomas Jefferson Street Blog
Poll Shows Americans Find Obama's IRS Story Barely Believable

There is still something fishy about the scandal at the IRS.

Do Benghazi, AP and IRS Scandals Reflect Obama’s Leadership Style?

It may be that a flawed leadership style is filtering down to the rest of the government.

In Marine Umbrella Incident, Republicans Still Deny Obama Is President

Umbrellagate is more proof that Obama's critics cannot acknowledge that he is, indeed, president.

Obama Isn't Nixon, but Needs More Friends in Washington

President Barack Obama needs to make more friends in Washington.

Republicans Can't Forget the Economy During Obama Scandals

Scandals provide good fodder for the GOP, but it can't forget about fixing unemployment.

Amidst Obama Scandals, Republicans Prepare a New Debt Ceiling Hostage

Republicans are preparing to take the debt ceiling hostage…again.

Benghazi, IRS and AP Scandals Reveal a Clueless President

The recent slew of scandals reveals an administration either incompetent or malicious.

The IRS Scandal Is About Budget Cuts, Not the Tea Party

Cutting the tax collection budget hurts everyone in the long-run.

Advertisement