Debate Club

Should Sports Betting Be Legal? >

Sports Betting Means Crime, Addiction, and Costs for Taxpayers

Illinois, New Jersey set a shady example by thumbing noses at ethical standards

June 15, 2012

About John Warren Kindt:

John Warren Kindt, a professor of business and legal policy at the University of Illinois, has testified before the U.S. Congress and state legislatures regarding socioeconomic gambling issues. He is a senior editor and contributing author to the multi-volume 2009-2012 United States International Gambling Report

Legalizing sports gambling would obviously create new taxpayer costs for crime and would open the door to widespread Internet gambling. More subtly and most importantly, legalizing sports gambling would result in the creation of new Wall Street financials and catalyze a new speculative bubble similar to the 2008 debacle on credit default swaps. The financial "side-bets" of sports gambling need to be exposed as creating no product, having no real asset base, and "wearing no clothes." Emphasizing similar points, the website for 60 Minutes still carries the viewable news report "The Bet That Blew Up Wall Street," a.k.a. "Financial WMDs."

The congressional bipartisan U.S. National Gambling Impact Study Commission highlighted that gambling scandals have historically accompanied collegiate, professional, and even Olympic sports. Noting that the U.S. Congress had been misled into allowing legalized sports gambling in four states(Delaware, Montana, Nevada, and Oregon), the U.S. Gambling Commission recommended "that the betting on collegiate and amateur athletic events that is currently legal be banned altogether." Before, during, and after the U.S. Gambling Commission, this Recommendation 3.7 was actively supported by all of the U.S. professional and collegiate sports associations, which were concerned with the "integrity of sports," the potential for systemic corruption, and organized crime.

[See a collection of political cartoons on the economy.]

Throughout the last decade, multiple congressional bills were introduced to close the "Las Vegas Loophole," which allows Nevada sports gambling. Despite majority support in both the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives to close the loophole, the Nevada congressional lobby was able procedurally to derail all of these bills—in a disturbing testament to the monetary lobbying power of the Nevada gambling interests.

According to the medical, sociological, and psychiatric communities, gambling addiction parallels drug addiction. These medical similarities may be viewed in the 60 Minutes news expose, "Slot Machines: The Big Gamble." Sports gambling is also known as the "gateway drug" to gambling addiction. At 4 percent to 6 percent of their demographic, young people are already showing double the gambling addiction rate of the older generations. Therefore, the U.S. Gambling Commission recommended extensive efforts to educate young people regarding the problematic nature of gambling (Rec. 3.13), and the commission recommended the continued criminalization of Internet gambling (Rec. 5.1).

When states such as New Jersey and Illinois consider ignoring the federal ban on sports gambling, they broadcast to Washington, D.C., and to the world that they are scofflaw states—unfit for Fortune 500 companies who need stability of expectations. In all economic scenarios, but particularly in economic downturns, governments should demonstrate ethical and stable decision-making attributes. The emperor of sports gambling is wearing no clothes.

Tags:
sports,
New Jersey,
gambling
Other Arguments
#1
#2

Yes — Fans already illegally place bets, so the government should step in

GARY PAYNE, Managing Director of the International Sports Betting Association

#3
#4

No — Our representatives need to use limited resources to generate economic prosperity, not fund false promises

JAMES B. BUTLER, Executive Director of the California Coalition Against Gambling Expansion

#5

No — Legalizing betting turns athletes into roulette chips

LES BERNAL, Executive Director of Stop Predatory Gambling

About Debate Club

A meeting of the sharpest minds on the day's most important topics, Debate Club brings in the best arguments and lets readers decide which is the most persuasive. Read the arguments, then vote. And be sure to check back often to see who has gotten the most support—and also to see what's being discussed now in the Debate Club.

Have ideas about what the Club should be debating? E-mail it to dclub@usnews.com.

You can also join the debate on Facebook or follow Debate Club on Twitter.

Advertisement
Cartoons
Thomas Jefferson Street Blog
Oklahoma Tornado Reminds Us of the Value of Teachers

The Oklahoma tornado reminds us of all the roles teachers take on.

IRS, AP and James Rosen Scandals Strike at the First Amendment

The Obama scandals paint a picture of an administration at odds with the First Amendment.

Anthony Weiner Is Too Liberal to Be New York City Mayor

New York City doesn't need another Democratic mayor.

Organizations Masquerading as Tax-Exempt is the Real IRS Scandal

The real scandal at the IRS is electioneering groups getting tax-exempt status.

E.W. Jackson Proves the Tea Party Learned Nothing

By nominating E.W. Jackson, Virginia Republicans hope extremism will save them.

IRS, AP and Benghazi Are Not Obama Scandals

The word "scandal" doesn't appropriately describe anything going on in Washington these days.

Democrats Should Be Worried About Polls After Obama Scandals

Democrats should be more worried about President Obama's approval ratings.

Tea Party IRS Rally Should Wait Until After Moore Tornado Recovery

Tea party rallies against the IRS should wait until the tornado victims are taken care of.

Advertisement