Debate Club

Should Special Operations Be Given More Autonomy? >

Red Tape No Excuse for Giving Special Ops Autonomy

First, fix the bureaucracy, then the real debate over secretive U.S. military operations can begin

February 17, 2012

About Mackenzie Eaglen:

Mackenzie Eaglen is a resident fellow at the Marilyn Ware Center for Security Studies at the American Enterprise Institute. She has worked on defense issues in the U.S. Congress, both House and Senate, and at the Pentagon in the Office of the Secretary of Defense and on the Joint Staff.

Special operations forces should not be given more autonomy. Current law already grants authority to the president and secretary of defense to designate U.S. Special Operations Command as the supported commander. Specifically, Title 10 of the U.S. Code allows special operations activities (the mission) to be conducted under the command of the regional unified combatant commander.

[Pentagon Budget Ends Post-9/11 Era, Ushers in Pacific Era.]

Special operations forces are a small, elite community of warriors who operate mostly in the shadows. They have been granted ever greater responsibilities for planning and conducting counterterrorism operations around the globe by the current administration and the one before it.

The temptation to grant them more autonomy grows increasingly seductive as President Obama has dramatically escalated U.S. counterterrorism operations in countries like Yemen and Somalia and increasingly leans on this community to help facilitate a speedier exit from Afghanistan. It sounds reasonable enough: Just grant the commander authority to maneuver forces across geographic lines of authority established by the Pentagon's unified command plan.

But instead of a knee-jerk, blind approval of more authority or autonomy, civilians should not give away more control to the U.S. military without serious debate. Congress should be carefully examining the growing other special operations forces that have traditionally fallen under the purview of the CIA.

[U.S. Official: 'No Out of the Ordinary' Military Moves on Syria, Iran.]

In fact, a recent report by the Congressional Research Service has already suggested that Congress examine "the conditions or rules that apparently enable U.S. special operations forces to operate more secretively and more rapidly under CIA control than under U.S. Special Operations Command control." The report goes on to state that another "possible concern is whether U.S. SOF are operating under CIA control in order to 'get around restrictions placed on military operations.'"

While no one disputes that the Department of Defense is a big bureaucracy—slow in its decision-making processes—giving this community even more autonomy to go around rather than fix the bureaucracy is the wrong solution.

Tags:
military strategy,
military,
Pentagon
Other Arguments
#1

Yes — A little leeway from regular Pentagon channels could well enhance U.S. security

THOMAS HENRIKSEN, Senior Fellow at Stanford University's Hoover Institution and at the U.S. Joint Special Operations University

#2

Yes — Of course, granting increased autonomy should not mean giving SOCOM carte blanche

MICHAEL P. NOONAN, Director of Foreign Policy Research Institute's Program on National Security

#3

Yes — Budgetary realities dictate a strategic shift toward more efficient and effective means of national defense

DOUGLAS MACGREGOR, Combat Veteran and Author of Warrior’s Rage: The Great Tank Battle of 73 Easting

#4

No — Missions that require limiting democracy should be minimized

BENJAMIN H. FRIEDMAN, Research Fellow in Defense and Homeland Security Studies at Cato

About Debate Club

A meeting of the sharpest minds on the day's most important topics, Debate Club brings in the best arguments and lets readers decide which is the most persuasive. Read the arguments, then vote. And be sure to check back often to see who has gotten the most support—and also to see what's being discussed now in the Debate Club.

Have ideas about what the Club should be debating? E-mail it to dclub@usnews.com.

You can also join the debate on Facebook or follow Debate Club on Twitter.

Advertisement
Cartoons
Thomas Jefferson Street Blog
Republicans Can't Forget the Economy During Obama Scandals

Scandals provide good fodder for the GOP, but it can't forget about fixing unemployment.

Amidst Obama Scandals, Republicans Prepare a New Debt Ceiling Hostage

Republicans are preparing to take the debt ceiling hostage…again.

Benghazi, IRS and AP Scandals Reveal a Clueless President

The recent slew of scandals reveals an administration either incompetent or malicious.

The IRS Scandal Is About Budget Cuts, Not the Tea Party

Cutting the tax collection budget hurts everyone in the long-run.

Obama 'Going Bulworth' Wouldn't Give Him Power Over Republicans

Both Congress and presidents overestimate the power of the Oval Office.

Bureaucracy Keeps Adopted Children Stuck in International Limbo

The U.S. needs to do more to ease the international adoption process.

The Real Scandal Behind the Benghazi Emails and Attacks

The GOP focuses on talking points while ignoring dangerous security budget cuts.

House Republicans Waste Time With Obamacare Repeal Vote

Why is the House bothering to repeal Obamacare yet again?

Advertisement