Debate Club

Should Same Sex Marriage Be Left to the States? >

The Freedom to Marry Transcends State Lines

We must establish the freedom to marry nationwide

December 17, 2012

About Casey Pick:

Casey Pick is a policy fellow with the National LGBT Bar Association, and a licensed attorney in the state of California.

Today America is divided on the issue of marriage, with certain states recognizing the love and commitment between same sex couples while others do not—but we will not be for long. The fundamental freedom that is the birthright of every citizen transcends state lines, and the individual liberty and equal protection enshrined in our Constitution trump even federalism.

Log Cabin Republicans take our name from President Abraham Lincoln, the first Republican president and the man who finally put slavery on "the path to ultimate extinction." Confronted with calls for a state-by-state process to put an end to that foul institution, Lincoln uttered the immortal words, "a house divided cannot stand…It shall become all one thing or all the other." The same principle applies to the freedom to marry.

[See a collection of political cartoons on gay marriage.]

There are circumstances where leaving decisions to the states is the best course, and where doing so is constitutionally required. America is blessed with 50 states, each of which can serve as a laboratory for policy, and our nation's sheer size and diversity favor local control. Federalism is actually one of the strongest arguments against the so-called Defense of Marriage Act, known as DOMA.

DOMA was designed to squash movement toward marriage equality in the states, and was an unprecedented intrusion by the federal government into regulating marriage. As a result, legally married same sex couples are treated as single by the federal government, including the IRS, the Social Security Administration, immigration services, and the Pentagon. Even DOMA's author, former Republican Rep. Bob Barr now condemns this kind of "one-way federalism."

[Read the U.S. News Debate: Should Gay Marriage be Legal Nationwide?]

When DOMA falls, it will still be necessary to establish the freedom to marry nationwide. The good news is that Election Day proved that our nation is progressing down the path to ultimate equality for LGBT people. This journey began more than a hundred years ago, with the passage of the 14th Amendment after the Civil War.

Theodore Olson, a conservative legal champion and former solicitor general to President George W. Bush, will soon make the case before the United States Supreme Court that "our society cannot ever live up to the promise of equality, and the fundamental rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, until we stop invidious discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation."

Log Cabin Republicans agree. The Constitution is clear: "No state shall…deny to any person the equal protection of the laws." Hopefully soon, that constitutional promise will be a reality, and America will be freer, stronger, and more united than ever.

Tags:
marriage,
LGBT rights
Other Arguments
#1

No — The Defense of Marriage Act must be repealed and replaced

IAN MILLHISER, Policy Analyst with the Center for American Progress

#2
#4

No — We must end federal discrimination against married same sex couples

STACEY LONG, Director of Public Policy and Government Affairs at the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force

#5

Yes — The fight for gay marriage belongs on the state level

JASON KUZNICKI, Research Fellow at the Cato Institute

#6

No — The federal government has the right to define marriage as one man and one woman

BRIAN BROWN, President of the National Organization for Marriage

Reader Comments ()

About Debate Club

A meeting of the sharpest minds on the day's most important topics, Debate Club brings in the best arguments and lets readers decide which is the most persuasive. Read the arguments, then vote. And be sure to check back often to see who has gotten the most support—and also to see what's being discussed now in the Debate Club.

Have ideas about what the Club should be debating? E-mail it to dclub@usnews.com.

You can also join the debate on Facebook or follow Debate Club on Twitter.

Advertisement
Cartoons
Thomas Jefferson Street Blog
Organizations Masquerading as Tax-Exempt is the Real IRS Scandal

The real scandal at the IRS is electioneering groups getting tax-exempt status.

E.W. Jackson Proves the Tea Party Learned Nothing

By nominating E.W. Jackson, Virginia Republicans hope extremism will save them.

IRS, AP and Benghazi Are Not Obama Scandals

The word "scandal" doesn't appropriately describe anything going on in Washington these days.

Democrats Should Be Worried About Polls After Obama Scandals

Democrats should be more worried about President Obama's approval ratings.

Tea Party IRS Rally Should Wait Until After Moore Tornado Recovery

Tea party rallies against the IRS should wait until the tornado victims are taken care of.

God Bless America and the Boy Scouts

The Fund does the right thing by pushing the Boy Scouts to lift its ban on gay members.

IRS, AP and Benghazi Show the Failure of Obama's Big Government

Giving an inefficient organization like the IRS more responsibility makes it more likely to screw up, not better able to solve this nation’s problems.

Coburn Wants Oklahoma Tornado Aid Offset With Budget Cuts

Oklahoma Senator Tom Coburn wants spending cuts before aid is sent to tornado victims in his own state.

Advertisement