Should Same Sex Marriage Be Left to the States? >
Marriage Equality Must Be Recognized by States and the Federal Government
The Defense of Marriage Act must be repealed and replaced
December 17, 2012
There are difficult questions in constitutional law. This is not one of them. The Constitution provides that "No state shall . . . deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws," and the last time I checked, gay men and lesbians are people. Moreover, LGBT Americans possess all the traits the Supreme Court identified as requiring heightened protection from discrimination. States are not allowed to defy the Constitution, period.
The federal government, of course, isn't allowed to defy the Constitution either, which is why marriage equality must be recognized by states and the federal government alike. Just so that we're clear, however, leaving marriage up to the states would actually be an improvement from the status quo.
[See a collection of political cartoons on gay marriage.]
The whole point of the unconstitutional Defense of Marriage Act is to impose Washington, D.C.'s one-size-fits-all view upon couples that don't want some Washington bureaucrat to stand between them and the marriage altar. Because of the Defense of Marriage Act's big government takeover of marriage, same sex couples must now appeal to a nine person, unelected, unaccountable "marriage panel" that will decide whether they get to have the same marriage rights as anyone else. The time has come to repeal and replace this job-killing, Washington takeover of marriage with common-sense, family-centered marriage equality.
- Join the debate on Facebook.
- Follow U.S. News Debate Club on Twitter.
- Check out U.S. News Weekly: an insider's guide to politics and policy.




Reader Comments ( )