Debate Club

Should Photo ID Be Required to Vote? >

Voter ID Laws Disenfranchise Millions

ID requirements are a burden to the electorate

July 13, 2012

About Kate Hess Pace:

Kate Hess Pace is a community organizer with ISAIAH, a faith-based Minnesota organization working to defeat a photo ID amendment on the 2012 ballot.

The new wave of photo ID laws sweeping the country will strip the right to vote from millions of eligible voters across America. Here in Minnesota it could lead to a complete restructuring of our election system, potentially removing same-day registration and absentee ballots. It's an extreme and unnecessary measure that threatens our most basic democratic practice as citizens.

We too often forget those who could be left behind if we insist upon government-issued IDs. According to the Brennan Center for Justice, 10 percent of all eligible voters and 25 percent of eligible African-American voters do not have government-issued IDs. The homeless, the homebound, returning veterans, the elderly, people of color, and college students are all vulnerable to these new laws. In 2008, 2.2 million were turned away at the polls for lack of a proper ID. We have long had a system in place to identify voters at polls—through address verifications and systems of vouching. Given that we are not a country that requires its citizens to carry government-issued IDs, this is an extreme burden on the electorate. While you need an ID to carry out many daily duties of life, one does not need an ID to participate in fundamental rights—free speech, practicing religion, and voting.

[See a collection of political cartoons on the 2012 campaign.]

There is little to no evidence of misuse of identification by voters at polls. Often described as a "solution in search of a problem," photo ID laws lift up the mythical specter of voter fraud, and in doing so, disenfranchise millions. In a country that prides itself on upholding democracy here and abroad, we must ask ourselves whether we are willing to dismantle our current system of participation and opt instead for a restrictive one that discourages and disenfranchises.

Social progress in America has been built on the expansion of participation. My grandmother witnessed a century where women gained the right to vote, and poll taxes and literacy tests were eliminated. The American story is a story of increasing inclusion—wherein all citizens shape our democracy. This is a step backwards into our darker moments in history, where only a few determined the fate of the many. In an era where Americans doubt the effectiveness of our leaders and see the heavy influence of money in politics, we cannot erode the most basic means of raising our voices—our sacred and constitutional right to vote.

Tags:
voters,
elections
Other Arguments
#1

Yes — IDs are required in everyday life and should be to vote, too

HANS A. VON SPAKOVSKY, Senior Legal Fellow at the Heritage Foundation

#2

Yes — There is nothing unreasonable about requiring people to show ID before voting

STEVEN GREENHUT, Vice President of Journalism at the Franklin Center for Government and Public Integrity

#3

Yes — Voter ID is the common-sense solution to voter fraud

DAN MCGRATH, Chairman of ProtectMyVote.com

#5

No — Denying people the right to vote isn't an acceptable political tactic

WENDY WEISER, Director of the Democracy Program at the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law

About Debate Club

A meeting of the sharpest minds on the day's most important topics, Debate Club brings in the best arguments and lets readers decide which is the most persuasive. Read the arguments, then vote. And be sure to check back often to see who has gotten the most support—and also to see what's being discussed now in the Debate Club.

Have ideas about what the Club should be debating? E-mail it to dclub@usnews.com.

You can also join the debate on Facebook or follow Debate Club on Twitter.

Advertisement
Cartoons
Thomas Jefferson Street Blog
President Obama's Code Pink Heckler Medea Benjamin Was Plain Rude

It's become acceptable for people to interrupt the president while he is delivering a formal speech on a deadly serious topic.

Obama Commerce Nominee Penny Pritzker’s Tax Problem

Obama’s Commerce Department nominee has some Romney-esque tax issues.

Oklahoma Tornado Reminds Us of the Value of Teachers

The Oklahoma tornado reminds us of all the roles teachers take on.

IRS, AP and James Rosen Scandals Strike at the First Amendment

The Obama scandals paint a picture of an administration at odds with the First Amendment.

Anthony Weiner Is Too Liberal to Be New York City Mayor

New York City doesn't need another Democratic mayor.

Organizations Masquerading as Tax-Exempt is the Real IRS Scandal

The real scandal at the IRS is electioneering groups getting tax-exempt status.

E.W. Jackson Proves the Tea Party Learned Nothing

By nominating E.W. Jackson, Virginia Republicans hope extremism will save them.

IRS, AP and Benghazi Are Not Obama Scandals

The word "scandal" doesn't appropriately describe anything going on in Washington these days.

Advertisement