Should Nuclear Power Be Expanded? >
U.S. Should Bring an End to the Nuclear Era
It shouldn't take a catastrophic meltdown on American soil to prod our government into action
February 3, 2012
About Jim Riccio:
Jim Riccio has been Greenpeace's Nuclear Policy Analyst since 2001 and has over two decades of nuclear activist experience.
Before the meltdowns and explosions at Fukushima spewed radiation into the air and ocean, again reminding the world of the inherent dangers of nuclear power, the so-called nuclear renaissance was already dead upon arrival in the U.S. But it wasn't the risk of a nuclear accident, the threat of nuclear weapons proliferation, or the intractable problem of radioactive waste that doomed the plans of the nuclear industry; it was the atomic economics.
[Check out the U.S. News Energy Intelligence blog.]
Nuclear power is prohibitively expensive, and the fiasco at Fukushima will only make it more so. When Progress Energy first proposed a new nuclear plant in Florida, the price tag was $2.5 billion to $3.5 billion dollars. The cost has since ballooned to as much as $22.5 billion, and Progress just negotiated a settlement that would allow it to kill the construction contract. Several other corporations that applied for new reactors have already asked government regulators to suspend their reviews.
When Warren Buffett's corporation MidAmerican looked into building a new nuclear reactor, it determined that it did not make "economic sense." Rather than risk billions of dollars on a new nuclear reactor, Buffett's corporation just made headlines by investing in renewable energy. Americans, President Obama, and the Congress have a choice. We can heed the caution of the "world's greatest investor" or we can we pursue new nuclear plants that Wall Street has called a "bet the farm" risk.
[See a collection of political cartoons on energy policy.]
Rather than expand the use of this dangerous and stupidly expensive technology, our government should stop subsidizing nuclear corporations' bad investments and instead develop plans to phase out nuclear power and better secure the deadly radioactive wastes. As former Japanese Prime Minister Naoto Kansaid at the World Economic Forum in Davos, "We should aim for a society that can function without nuclear energy."
Successfully phasing out nuclear power in the U.S. and securing the deadly radioactive wastes while avoiding another catastrophic accident will be a daunting challenge. Nearly a third of U.S. reactors are of the same vulnerable design as Fukushima and just as dangerous. The Fukushima fiasco has already propelled several governments to phase out nuclear power and expand renewable energy and efficiency programs. The Obama administration should follow their lead. It shouldn't take a catastrophic meltdown on American soil to prod our government into action. Rather than build more nuclear reactors and produce even more radioactive waste, the U.S. should bring an end to the nuclear era.
- Join the debate on Facebook.
- Follow U.S. News Debate Club on Twitter.
- Obama Exaggerates Role of Federal Government in Natural Gas Boom.
- Other Arguments
-
#2310244
Yes — Increasing nuclear electricity production will decrease our carbon footprint
ERIC LOEWEN, President of the American Nuclear Society
-
#3287261
No — Nuclear power isn't affordable, clean, or safe
MICHAEL MARIOTTE, Executive Director and Chief Spokesperson for the Nuclear Information and Resource Service
-
#4264246
No — Investing in energy efficiency remains the most cost-effective solution
TYSON SLOCUM, Director of Public Citizen's Energy Program
-
#5256242
Yes — Nuclear power reduces emissions without destroying jobs
JOHN SHIMKUS, U.S. Representative, Illinois's 19th District
-
#6238235
Yes — Alternative, less-clean power generators simply cannot compete
ANTHONY R. PIETRANGELO, Senior Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer of the Nuclear Energy Institute
-
#6257254
No — The world has moved on to new technologies
EDWARD J. MARKEY, U.S. Representative, Massachusetts's 7th District
Reader Comments Read all comments (13)
Nemo of IN 2:29AM February 14, 2012
Jack Fate of CA 11:41PM February 06, 2012
Karen Hadden of TX 4:05PM February 06, 2012