Debate Club

Should NCAA Athletes Be Paid?

Should NCAA Athletes Be Paid?

This weekend, the Final Four of both the Women's and Men's NCAA basketball tournaments will garner the collective attention of sports fans across the country. Brackets will be busted, nets will be cut down, and two champions will ultimately be crowned.

But while those teams are celebrating a national title, the real winners of the tournaments may be their corporate sponsors, broadcasters and ultimately, the NCAA itself.

The NCAA basketball tournaments, or "March Madness," have become a huge business. As Forbes' Chris Smith wrote, CBS and Turner Broadcasting make more than $1 billion off the games, "thanks in part to a $700,000 ad rate for a 30-second spot during the Final Four." Athletic conferences receive millions of dollars in payouts from the NCAA when their teams advance deep into the tournament. Ditto for the coaches of the final squads standing. The NCAA, as a whole, makes $6 billion annually.

But the players themselves don't see any of that money, even as they risk career-ending injuries every time that they step onto the court, field or rink. Just last weekend, Louisville's Kevin Ware suffered a gruesome broken leg (but successfully had surgery that will enable him to return to playing eventually).

The huge amount of money being made off college sports has led some to question whether student-athletes can be considered amateurs any longer, and whether they should, instead, be paid for their efforts. The New York Times' Joe Nocera has been beating the drum to reform the NCAA, and he is certainly not alone. A group of former players has filed an antitrust lawsuit alleging that student athletes are entitled to some of the money the NCAA makes off of using their names and likenesses on merchandise such as jerseys and video games.

But on the flip side, the argument can be made that the opportunity to both receive an education and get the exposure to win a major professional contract more than compensates NCAA athletes for their efforts. "Rather than push college athletics further and further from academics, we need to bring it closer," says NCAA president Mike Emmert.

So should NCAA athletes be paid? Here's the Debate Club's take:


The Arguments

#1
930 Pts
Fans Must Understand That College Sports Is Big Business

Yes – Fans Must Understand That College Sports Is Big Business

Brian Frederick Board Member of Sports Fans Coalition

#2
636 Pts
A Fair Day's Pay for a Fair Day's Work

Yes – A Fair Day's Pay for a Fair Day's Work

Ramogi Huma Founder of the National College Players Association

#3
632 Pts
Without Athletes, The Big Money in College Sports Disappears

Yes – Without Athletes, The Big Money in College Sports Disappears

Bobby Rush Democratic Representative from Illinois

#4
630 Pts
NCAA Amateurism Is an Illusion

Yes – NCAA Amateurism Is an Illusion

Warren Zola Assistant Dean for Graduate Programs at Boston College

#5
-190 Pts
Real Scholarships Need to Make a Comeback

No, but – Real Scholarships Need to Make a Comeback

Allen Sack Professor in the College of Business at the University of New Haven

#6
-288 Pts
College Athletes Are Already Paid With Their Education

No, But – College Athletes Are Already Paid With Their Education

Richard Burton Professor of Sport Management at Syracuse University

#7
-443 Pts
The Cost of Paying Athletes Would Be Far Too High

No, but – The Cost of Paying Athletes Would Be Far Too High

Andrew Zimbalist Professor of Economics at Smith College


Previous Topics

You Might Also Like


See More