Debate Club

Should FEMA's Responsibilities Be Handed Over to the States? >

FEMA Doesn't Have Local Knowledge Needed for Effective Relief

Large scale disaster is best handled on the state and local level

November 1, 2012

About Steven Horwitz:

Steven Horwitz is a Mercatus Center senior affiliated scholar.

The mistakes made by FEMA during its response to Hurricane Katrina are the stuff of legend. It failed to get to the worst hit areas for days, it was unprepared for the scope of the disaster, and many of the trailers it provided for temporary housing were later found to be toxic. It is hard to identify anything it did right in New Orleans and the Gulf Coast. Local politicians were merciless in their criticisms, even to the point of—rightly—praising the job done by Walmart in getting supplies to the New Orleans area and crediting Walmart's response with preventing looting and other problems in their towns.

FEMA's failures—and there have been other less dramatic ones since—are largely due to the inability of the federal government to acquire the local knowledge needed for effective disaster response and relief. We have learned from Katrina that even a large scale disaster is best handled by people who know the residents and local culture in ways that allow them to tailor their responses to the needs of the population.

[See Photos of Heroic Superstorm Rescues.]

The one effective federal government agency during Katrina was the Coast Guard, and that was because they have a more decentralized structure that allowed them to create working relationships with community members on the coast. Similarly, the reason for Walmart's successful disaster response is that in addition to their immense skill at moving resources, they have detailed data on what different markets need in the aftermath of disasters. This local knowledge and connections are what FEMA lacks, but are more likely to be found at the state and local level.

Decentralizing disaster relief as much as possible would have two other salutary effects. First, it would de-politicize federal declarations of disaster, as evidence indicates a strong correlation between such declarations and the seniority and connections of members of Congress from those areas. Second, it would allow local authorities to work closely with both community organizations and other nonprofits, as well as the private sector to create disaster relief plans that are appropriate to their specific areas.

Tags:
Hurricane Sandy,
hurricanes,
Hurricane Katrina,
FEMA
Other Arguments
#2

No — Suggesting that FEMA's responsibilities be handed over to the states is a dangerous proposition

SCOTT GABRIEL KNOWLES, JAMES M. KENDRA, Associate Professor at Drexel University, Director of the Disaster Research Center

#3
#4

No — Big storms require big government, but little storms don't

MATT MAYER, Visiting Fellow at the Heritage Foundation

#5

No — States aren't equipped to properly respond to all kinds of natural disasters

JOHN HUDAK, Fellow in Governance Studies at the Brookings Institution

Reader Comments ()

About Debate Club

A meeting of the sharpest minds on the day's most important topics, Debate Club brings in the best arguments and lets readers decide which is the most persuasive. Read the arguments, then vote. And be sure to check back often to see who has gotten the most support—and also to see what's being discussed now in the Debate Club.

Have ideas about what the Club should be debating? E-mail it to dclub@usnews.com.

You can also join the debate on Facebook or follow Debate Club on Twitter.

Advertisement
Cartoons
Thomas Jefferson Street Blog
Oklahoma Tornado Reminds Us of the Value of Teachers

The Oklahoma tornado reminds us of all the roles teachers take on.

IRS, AP and James Rosen Scandals Strike at the First Amendment

The Obama scandals paint a picture of an administration at odds with the First Amendment.

Anthony Weiner Is Too Liberal to Be New York City Mayor

New York City doesn't need another Democratic mayor.

Organizations Masquerading as Tax-Exempt is the Real IRS Scandal

The real scandal at the IRS is electioneering groups getting tax-exempt status.

E.W. Jackson Proves the Tea Party Learned Nothing

By nominating E.W. Jackson, Virginia Republicans hope extremism will save them.

IRS, AP and Benghazi Are Not Obama Scandals

The word "scandal" doesn't appropriately describe anything going on in Washington these days.

Democrats Should Be Worried About Polls After Obama Scandals

Democrats should be more worried about President Obama's approval ratings.

Tea Party IRS Rally Should Wait Until After Moore Tornado Recovery

Tea party rallies against the IRS should wait until the tornado victims are taken care of.

Advertisement