Debate Club

Should federal authorities be able to close medical marijuana dispensaries in California? >

Medical Marijuana Is California's Business

State has right to experiment; federal government has more important things to do

October 26, 2011

About Morgan Fox:

Morgan Fox is the communications manager at the Marijuana Policy Project, a non-profit organization dedicated to reforming marijuana laws on a state and federal level.

Our system of government was designed to allow the states to act as laboratories of democracy, experimenting with policies that might be most appropriate for them. One of the roles of the federal government is to protect that right, but according to current federal law, that right does not extend to marijuana policy. In 2009, however, the Obama administration signaled that it would restore that right, in part, and not interfere with states that allowed the use of marijuana for medical purposes. While only Congress can change federal drug laws to truly free the hands of the states to enact compassionate marijuana policies, the president promised that he would not waste Justice Department resources going after patients and providers who were in compliance with state law. He should keep that promise.

[See a collection of political cartoons on the economy.]

The recent federal announcement of intent to crack down on dispensaries in California is misguided, both practically and ideologically. To begin with, closing dispensaries will do nothing to impact the illicit distribution of marijuana. If anything, the patients directly affected by the closures will be forced to obtain their medicine from criminals, thus enriching the very people the Department of Justice is hoping to put out of business.

Many patients are unable to grow their own medical marijuana or duplicate the variety and quality available in collectives and dispensaries. By targeting dispensaries, the federal government is ensuring that their quality of life will suffer, in addition to their personal safety.

Medical marijuana has become an important part of California's economy as well. Last year, these legitimate businesses reported more than a billion dollars in revenue and contributed more than $150 million in taxes to the local, state, and federal governments. At a time when national and state budgets are in dire straits, and Americans are hurting for jobs, it makes no sense to punish businesses for being successful.

Not only does this crackdown affect the medical marijuana industry but the media as well. The Department of Justice, as part of the crackdown, has said that it will prosecute newspapers and TV and radio stations that run ads for medical marijuana. Without the revenue from these businesses, many media outlets will have to cut staff or close down entirely. Can California afford to lose jobs and revenue to justify a misguided, and ultimately fruitless, strategy?

The vast majority of Californians support medical marijuana. They should be allowed to continue to experiment with regulations that will govern the industry required to provide patients with safe access to their medicine. The federal government has more important things to worry about.

Tags:
marijuana,
California,
employment,
economy,
Department of Justice
Other Arguments
#1
#2

No — Shutting down dispensaries sends patients into the illicit market

KRIS HERMES, Media Spokesperson for Americans for Safe Access

#4
#5

Yes — The FDA, not popular opinion, tests and approves medicines

KEVIN SABET, Former Senior Adviser for Policy to White House Office of National Drug Control Policy Director

#6

Yes — System makes criminals money, makes highways unsafe, and doesn't make the sick any better

PETER BENSINGER, Former Administrator of the United States Drug Enforcement Administration

#7

Yes — Marijuana dispensaries have increased incidents of drug use and crime

JOHN REDMAN, Executive Director of Californians for Drug Free Youth

About Debate Club

A meeting of the sharpest minds on the day's most important topics, Debate Club brings in the best arguments and lets readers decide which is the most persuasive. Read the arguments, then vote. And be sure to check back often to see who has gotten the most support—and also to see what's being discussed now in the Debate Club.

Have ideas about what the Club should be debating? E-mail it to dclub@usnews.com.

You can also join the debate on Facebook or follow Debate Club on Twitter.

Advertisement
Cartoons
Thomas Jefferson Street Blog
President Obama's Code Pink Heckler Medea Benjamin Was Plain Rude

It's become acceptable for people to interrupt the president while he is delivering a formal speech on a deadly serious topic.

Obama Commerce Nominee Penny Pritzker’s Tax Problem

Obama’s Commerce Department nominee has some Romney-esque tax issues.

Oklahoma Tornado Reminds Us of the Value of Teachers

The Oklahoma tornado reminds us of all the roles teachers take on.

IRS, AP and James Rosen Scandals Strike at the First Amendment

The Obama scandals paint a picture of an administration at odds with the First Amendment.

Anthony Weiner Is Too Liberal to Be New York City Mayor

New York City doesn't need another Democratic mayor.

Organizations Masquerading as Tax-Exempt is the Real IRS Scandal

The real scandal at the IRS is electioneering groups getting tax-exempt status.

E.W. Jackson Proves the Tea Party Learned Nothing

By nominating E.W. Jackson, Virginia Republicans hope extremism will save them.

IRS, AP and Benghazi Are Not Obama Scandals

The word "scandal" doesn't appropriately describe anything going on in Washington these days.

Advertisement