Debate Club

Should Congress Interfere with China's Currency Policies? >

Protectionism Could Engender Chinese Retaliation

Imposing a tariff on imports will adversely affect the American economy

October 13, 2011

About Andrew Roth:

Andrew Roth is the Vice President of Government Affairs at Club for Growth. Previously, Mr. Roth was a securities trader for an established broker-dealer in Omaha, Nebraska, and also the owner and publisher for The Iron Fist of Capitalism, a website that analyzed supply-side economics.

If the bill that the Senate approved is passed into law, it will make it easier for our government to place tariffs on Chinese imports.

Whether this legislation is justified because of China's monetary policy is irrelevant. More important are the effects this bill will have on our economy.

[See a collection of political cartoons on the economy.]

It seems nonsensical to punish a foreign country by raising taxes on your own citizens, but that's exactly what this bill does. A tariff on Chinese imports will hurt both American consumers and businesses. For consumers, it's a regressive tax that hits low-income and middle-income people the hardest. They are the ones who rely on cheap necessities that allow them to invest and save whatever is left on retirement and their children's education. Businesses will suffer as well. China ships many raw materials and capital equipment that our own businesses buy to make a final product that is priced competitively in the global market. If you raise taxes on them through higher tariffs, you hurt American businesses and the people they employ.

Supporters of this bill must be blind to the near certainty that China will retaliate. China quickly imposed tariffs on American products after we slapped tariffs on imports of steel in 2002 and tires in 2009. Those retaliatory duties did direct harm to our economy.

[Read more about the deficit and national debt.]

When you combine the higher tariffs that we would enact against China, and the retaliatory tariffs that they would impose upon us in response, it's a double whammy to our economy.

Protectionism is bad policy that history has shown time and time again to have a negative effect on the economy. Let's hope cooler heads prevail before it's too late.

Tags:
Asia,
China,
economy,
legislation,
Congress,
taxes,
Beijing,
money
Other Arguments
#1

Yes — China will respond to pressure if the U.S. passes currency bill

SCOTT PAUL, Executive Director of the Alliance for American Manufacturing

#2

Yes — China's currency policy has cost millions of American jobs

JOSEPH GAGNON, Senior Fellow at Peterson Institute for International Economics

#3

No — Trade freely with the Chinese regardless of exchange rates

DONALD J. BOUDREAUX, Professor of Economics at George Mason University

#5

No — Don't Blame China for U.S. Economic Woes

YUKON HUANG, Senior Associate at Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

About Debate Club

A meeting of the sharpest minds on the day's most important topics, Debate Club brings in the best arguments and lets readers decide which is the most persuasive. Read the arguments, then vote. And be sure to check back often to see who has gotten the most support—and also to see what's being discussed now in the Debate Club.

Have ideas about what the Club should be debating? E-mail it to dclub@usnews.com.

You can also join the debate on Facebook or follow Debate Club on Twitter.

Advertisement
Cartoons
Thomas Jefferson Street Blog
Obama Commerce Nominee Penny Pritzker’s Tax Problem

Obama’s Commerce Department nominee has some Romney-esque tax issues.

Oklahoma Tornado Reminds Us of the Value of Teachers

The Oklahoma tornado reminds us of all the roles teachers take on.

IRS, AP and James Rosen Scandals Strike at the First Amendment

The Obama scandals paint a picture of an administration at odds with the First Amendment.

Anthony Weiner Is Too Liberal to Be New York City Mayor

New York City doesn't need another Democratic mayor.

Organizations Masquerading as Tax-Exempt is the Real IRS Scandal

The real scandal at the IRS is electioneering groups getting tax-exempt status.

E.W. Jackson Proves the Tea Party Learned Nothing

By nominating E.W. Jackson, Virginia Republicans hope extremism will save them.

IRS, AP and Benghazi Are Not Obama Scandals

The word "scandal" doesn't appropriately describe anything going on in Washington these days.

Democrats Should Be Worried About Polls After Obama Scandals

Democrats should be more worried about President Obama's approval ratings.

Advertisement