Debate Club

Should Congress Interfere with China's Currency Policies? >

For a Serious Impact, Tax Chinese Assets in the United States

China's currency policy has cost millions of American jobs

October 13, 2011

About Joseph Gagnon:

Joseph E. Gagnon is a senior fellow at Peterson Institute for International Economics. He previously served on the U.S. Federal Reseve Board and at the U.S. Treasury. He is author of Flexible Exchange Rates for a Stable World Economy and The Global Outlook for Government Debt over the Next 25 years: Implications for the Economy and Public Policy.

Any exchange rate involves two currencies by definition. Congress, and the U.S. government more broadly, undeniably have an interest in any foreign attempt to manipulate the value of the dollar in terms of another currency. So, what action should the U.S. government take in response to China's currency policy?

First, it is important to understand what China is doing. The currencies of countries that are growing rapidly tend to increase in value, which offsets their declining costs of production and maintains balanced trade. By aggressively buying U.S. and European assets, China short-circuits this currency appreciation in order to boost Chinese exports and damp Chinese imports. This is a strategy that has been copied by many other developing economies, and the International Monetary Fund estimates that governments in these economies are spending about $1.2 trillion this year to hold their currencies down, about half of which is accounted for by China. This spending has distorted trade balances between developing economies and advanced economies by a roughly equal amount, so that U.S. net exports are at least $400 billion lower than they would otherwise be. That translates into 3 million or more lost jobs in the United States.

[Read more bout the deficit and national debt.]

Before the Great Recession, the U.S. Federal Reserve responded to this currency manipulation by holding interest rates low to relieve pressure on the dollar and to encourage job creation in the United States. Much of the job creation came in the form of building houses. Now that the housing bubble has collapsed, the Fed has pushed interest rates to zero and yet the recovery remains woefully weak. We need China to stop its harmful manipulation immediately.

The best course of action would be to tax the assets that China and other currency manipulators buy in the United States, as I proposed recently with my colleague Gary Hufbauer. This has the advantage of being consistent with international law and it gets directly at the cause of the problem. The current legislation being considered by Congress imposes minor rule changes for antidumping and countervailing duty cases, changes to U.S. government procurement practices, and consultations with international institutions. These will not have a serious impact on China or other currency manipulators and some of these measures may be ruled illegal under international law.

Tags:
China,
Asia,
Congress,
legislation,
economy,
money
Other Arguments
#1

Yes — China will respond to pressure if the U.S. passes currency bill

SCOTT PAUL, Executive Director of the Alliance for American Manufacturing

#3

No — Trade freely with the Chinese regardless of exchange rates

DONALD J. BOUDREAUX, Professor of Economics at George Mason University

#4

No — Imposing a tariff on imports will adversely affect the American economy

ANDREW ROTH, Vice President of Government Affairs at Club for Growth

#5

No — Don't Blame China for U.S. Economic Woes

YUKON HUANG, Senior Associate at Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

Reader Comments Read all comments (2)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

China and Madoff Fraud Parallels and How All U.S. Trade is Adversely Affected

The New York Times October 4, 2011 editorial: The Wrong Way to Deal with China starts with the sentence, "China is undeniably manipulating its currency." If China's currency manipulation is undeniable, it follows that the Chinese economic miracle to a greater or lesser degree is a product of the perpetration of a fraud. China's currency manipulation (1994 -- 2011) is the most recent fraud, in terms of duration, to rival the Madoff Ponzi scheme (pre-1989 -- 2008). This begs the question: Why have these frauds gone on for so long?

With regard to China's currency manipulation, the vast majority of commentators are divided into two factions: those who deny that China engages in currency manipulation, and those who contend that China keeps its currency undervalued. Only a handful contend that China actually keeps its trading partners' currencies overvalued.

Madoff observers were similarly divided, with the vast majority denying any fraud at all, and others contending that Madoff was defrauding brokerage customers to enrich his investors, but not defrauding his investors. Only a handful believed Madoff was defrauding his investors, via a Ponzi scheme. The Madoff's Ponzi scheme shook America's confidence in our financial markets to the core.

The ramification of whether a country is keeping its currency undervalued as opposed to keeping its trading partners' currencies overvalued is not inconsequential. From the perspective of U.S. exporters an undervalued Chinese currency acts as a tax only on exports to China, whereas an overvalued U.S. Dollar acts as a tax on all exports from the United States. Since exports to China are about 1/14th of all U.S. exports, an overvalued U.S. Dollar is 14 times as damaging to the American economy as an undervaluation of Chinese currency, all other factors being equal.

From the perspective of U.S. exporters, an undervalued Chinese currency should only concern our exporters to China, while an overvalued U.S. Dollar should concern all American exporters. China's manipulation of the Dollar taints all U.S. trade, therefore priority one should be to stop China's manipulation of our currency before the United States even considers entering into any more free trade agreements (FTAs). Entering into additional FTAs before China's manipulation of the Dollar is stopped is analogous to building a castle in the sand.

In Chapter 19 of his 1817 classic, On the Principles of Political Economy, and Taxation , David Ricardo, the father of political economics, warned that war, the removal of capital, and a new tax are destroyers of the comparative advantage which a country before possessed in manufacturing. The new tax that Ricardo writes about need not be a tax assessed within the United States. Taxes on our exports by our trading partners would suffice to destroy the comparative advantage which the United States previously possessed in manufacturing.

Hugh Campbell of NY 10:43PM October 15, 2011

Thank you. Very nice explanation of how currency manipulation works.

Stack of PA 10:50AM October 13, 2011

About Debate Club

A meeting of the sharpest minds on the day's most important topics, Debate Club brings in the best arguments and lets readers decide which is the most persuasive. Read the arguments, then vote. And be sure to check back often to see who has gotten the most support—and also to see what's being discussed now in the Debate Club.


Have ideas about what the Club should be debating? E-mail it to dclub@usnews.com.


You can also join the debate on Facebook or follow Debate Club on Twitter.

Advertisement
Cartoons
Thomas Jefferson Street Blog
Obama's Remarkable Silence on Latin American Press Abuses

President Obama's silence on press freedom in Latin America is troubling.

Why the Media Is Giving Romney a Pass on Trump's Birtherism

Why the media hasn't pressed Mitt Romney about Donald Trump's birther fantasies.

Romney's Bain Experience Wasn't Real American Capitalism

The fact that Bain Capital served to make money for investors, not to create jobs, could endanger Romney.

Why Is Mitt Romney Embracing Birther Donald Trump?

Maybe Trump is Romney's idea of a rich guy that common people can relate to?

Does Barack Obama Actually Want to Be Re-Elected?

The president's lack of enthusiasm jeopardizes his campaign.

3 Reasons Why the Scott Walker Wisconsin Recall Election Matters

Scott Walker is a canary in a coal mine.

The Right's Fixation With 'Vetting' Obama

American voters can use the past four years to judge Obama's qualifications as president

Voters Tuning Out Flood of 2012 Super PAC, Campaign Ads

This will be the year of grassroots voters, not Nielsen families.

Advertisement