Chinese Currency Bill Won't Spark Trade War

Hi there,

Please have a look at the economic analysis conducted by the Congressional Research Service.

Overall, treating the currency bill as a jobs bill simply will not work; it will not repatriate jobs to the U.S, and will be ineffective in closing the trade deficit in the short term.

http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/row/RS21625.pdf

Also, please have a look at the US-China Business Council's analysis on the issue. The USCBC represents American Companies operating in China.

https://www.uschina.org/info/currency/

Thank you!

Addie of NH 4:16PM January 22, 2012

China and Madoff Fraud Parallels and How All U.S. Trade is Adversely Affected

The New York Times October 4, 2011 editorial: The Wrong Way to Deal with China starts with the sentence, "China is undeniably manipulating its currency." If China's currency manipulation is undeniable, it follows that the Chinese economic miracle to a greater or lesser degree is a product of the perpetration of a fraud. China's currency manipulation (1994 -- 2011) is the most recent fraud, in terms of duration, to rival the Madoff Ponzi scheme (pre-1989 -- 2008). This begs the question: Why have these frauds gone on for so long?

With regard to China's currency manipulation, the vast majority of commentators are divided into two factions: those who deny that China engages in currency manipulation, and those who contend that China keeps its currency undervalued. Only a handful contend that China actually keeps its trading partners' currencies overvalued.

Madoff observers were similarly divided, with the vast majority denying any fraud at all, and others contending that Madoff was defrauding brokerage customers to enrich his investors, but not defrauding his investors. Only a handful believed Madoff was defrauding his investors, via a Ponzi scheme. The Madoff's Ponzi scheme shook America's confidence in our financial markets to the core.

The ramification of whether a country is keeping its currency undervalued as opposed to keeping its trading partners' currencies overvalued is not inconsequential. From the perspective of U.S. exporters an undervalued Chinese currency acts as a tax only on exports to China, whereas an overvalued U.S. Dollar acts as a tax on all exports from the United States. Since exports to China are about 1/14th of all U.S. exports, an overvalued U.S. Dollar is 14 times as damaging to the American economy as an undervaluation of Chinese currency, all other factors being equal.

From the perspective of U.S. exporters, an undervalued Chinese currency should only concern our exporters to China, while an overvalued U.S. Dollar should concern all American exporters. China's manipulation of the Dollar taints all U.S. trade, therefore priority one should be to stop China's manipulation of our currency before the United States even considers entering into any more free trade agreements (FTAs). Entering into additional FTAs before China's manipulation of the Dollar is stopped is analogous to building a castle in the sand.

In Chapter 19 of his 1817 classic, On the Principles of Political Economy, and Taxation , David Ricardo, the father of political economics, warned that war, the removal of capital, and a new tax are destroyers of the comparative advantage which a country before possessed in manufacturing. The new tax that Ricardo writes about need not be a tax assessed within the United States. Taxes on our exports by our trading partners would suffice to destroy the comparative advantage which the United States previously possessed in manufacturing.

Hugh Campbell of NY 10:39PM October 15, 2011

Yes if people dont like it they should go live in China.

carla renfro of FL 5:54PM October 13, 2011

YES , China's currency manipulation hurts ours manufacturing industry by creating in unleavel playing field. This cost us manufacturing jobs and add to our trade defiicit .

michael Mitchell of IN 5:23PM October 13, 2011