Debate Club

Should Congress Interfere with China's Currency Policies? >

Chinese Currency Bill Won't Spark Trade War

China will respond to pressure if the U.S. passes currency bill

October 13, 2011

About Scott Paul:

Scott N. Paul is the founding Executive Director of the Alliance for American Manufacturing. Prior to forming the Alliance, Mr. Paul was the principal lobbyist for the Industrial Union Council and was a trade lobbyist at the AFL-CIO. He served as a staff member to the late Rep. Jim Jontz and former Rep. Peter Barca and as the chief foreign policy and trade advisor to then-House Democratic Whip David E. Bonior.

Congress should pass a China currency bill and President Obama should sign it. This legislation is bipartisan, enjoys broad public support, and is one of the very few things Washington can do to assist in creating jobs without spending tax dollars. Until we achieve more balanced trade with China, it will be virtually impossible to revive our struggling economy.

China is acting in its own short-term interest by undervaluing its currency. That alone is not reason enough for action. But China's currency policy affects American exports and jobs, which does make it our business. While Washington cannot change China's currency policy unilaterally, if Congress provides new tools for businesses to seek recourse under U.S. trade law, we will effectively deter further currency manipulation.

[Read about a Congressional bill aimed at making China raise the value of its currency.]

The consequences of China's currency policy have been devastating. China's cheating has destroyed American jobs: 2.8 million jobs from 2001 to 2010, according to one estimate. We have a $273 billion annual trade deficit with China and just recorded the worst decade for American manufacturing in our history—even worse than the Great Depression.

Fred Bergsten, director of the Peterson Institute for International Economics, has called China's currency policy "the most protectionist measure taken by any major country since World War II." To let China continue this policy would be willful neglect.

The remedy proposed in Congress is an effective one. It will not spark a trade war, nor will it raise prices for consumers. That's because China relies on access to the American consumer market. Instead, the legislation will deter China from continued manipulation of its currency while allowing U.S. manufacturers to compete on a more level playing field.

[See a collection of political cartoons on the economy.]

Ending China's currency manipulation could create as many as 2.25 million American jobs and reduce our budget deficit by up to $71.4 billion per year, according to a recent study.

We know that China responds to pressure. Beijing has nudged the yuan upward several times since 2005 to avoid threatened sanctions.

China's currency policy is the most onerous tax on American business. It serves as a 30-40 percent tariff on American exports headed to China. No wonder we only export $1 of goods to China for every $5 we import. It's time to repeal this tax. Bipartisan currency legislation in Congress is the first step toward such relief.

Tags:
China,
Asia,
Congress,
economy,
legislation,
Beijing,
taxes,
money
Other Arguments
#2

Yes — China's currency policy has cost millions of American jobs

JOSEPH GAGNON, Senior Fellow at Peterson Institute for International Economics

#3

No — Trade freely with the Chinese regardless of exchange rates

DONALD J. BOUDREAUX, Professor of Economics at George Mason University

#4

No — Imposing a tariff on imports will adversely affect the American economy

ANDREW ROTH, Vice President of Government Affairs at Club for Growth

#5

No — Don't Blame China for U.S. Economic Woes

YUKON HUANG, Senior Associate at Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

Reader Comments Read all comments (14)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

China has no real business acumen. If they did, they would research and develop a product,tool up and produce the product, then go out and market the product which sometimes involves creating a demand.

What they do instead is wait for whats left of the American inovators to do all that then when their spys see some success, they copy the product and sell it for 50% less and "steal" the inovators efforts. Whether they are copywritten or not.

Our government has failed to protect this great American tradition and at this point, it is no longer worth the time, effort, and money to develop new products here in America.

Can you imagine any one investing

$500,000,000 in a company producing solar panels in America and then losing all of it because they couldn't compete with Chinese imported solar panels?

Its the same with any product. Make it in China or you will fail, or they will steal it!

One more point; How can commentators say "Imposing tariffs on imports will adversely affect the American economy"

The American economy has been adversely affected in case you hadn't noticed.

We had tariffs in this country for most of our history to protect manufacturing and we became the richest most powerfull country the world has ever seen.

Steve of CA 3:22PM March 13, 2012

Hi there,

Please have a look at the economic analysis conducted by the Congressional Research Service.

Overall, treating the currency bill as a jobs bill simply will not work; it will not repatriate jobs to the U.S, and will be ineffective in closing the trade deficit in the short term.

http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/row/RS21625.pdf

Also, please have a look at the US-China Business Council's analysis on the issue. The USCBC represents American Companies operating in China.

https://www.uschina.org/info/currency/

Thank you!

Addie of NH 4:16PM January 22, 2012

Hi there,

Please have a look at the economic analysis conducted by the Congressional Research Service.

Overall, treating the currency bill as a jobs bill simply will not work; it will not repatriate jobs to the U.S, and will be ineffective in closing the trade deficit in the short term.

http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/row/RS21625.pdf

Also, please have a look at the US-China Business Council's analysis on the issue. The USCBC represents American Companies operating in China.

https://www.uschina.org/info/currency/

Thank you!

Addie of NH 4:16PM January 22, 2012

About Debate Club

A meeting of the sharpest minds on the day's most important topics, Debate Club brings in the best arguments and lets readers decide which is the most persuasive. Read the arguments, then vote. And be sure to check back often to see who has gotten the most support—and also to see what's being discussed now in the Debate Club.


Have ideas about what the Club should be debating? E-mail it to dclub@usnews.com.


You can also join the debate on Facebook or follow Debate Club on Twitter.

Advertisement
Cartoons
Thomas Jefferson Street Blog
Obama's Remarkable Silence on Latin American Press Abuses

President Obama's silence on press freedom in Latin America is troubling.

Why the Media Is Giving Romney a Pass on Trump's Birtherism

Why the media hasn't pressed Mitt Romney about Donald Trump's birther fantasies.

Romney's Bain Experience Wasn't Real American Capitalism

The fact that Bain Capital served to make money for investors, not to create jobs, could endanger Romney.

Why Is Mitt Romney Embracing Birther Donald Trump?

Maybe Trump is Romney's idea of a rich guy that common people can relate to?

Does Barack Obama Actually Want to Be Re-Elected?

The president's lack of enthusiasm jeopardizes his campaign.

3 Reasons Why the Scott Walker Wisconsin Recall Election Matters

Scott Walker is a canary in a coal mine.

The Right's Fixation With 'Vetting' Obama

American voters can use the past four years to judge Obama's qualifications as president

Voters Tuning Out Flood of 2012 Super PAC, Campaign Ads

This will be the year of grassroots voters, not Nielsen families.

Advertisement