Debate Club

Should al Qaeda Spokesperson Sulaiman Abu Ghaith be Prosecuted in Federal Court? >

Military Courts Can Only Prosecute Suspects Accused of War Crimes

Sulaiman Abu Ghaith can't be tied to specific acts of international terrorism

March 12, 2013

About Stephen Vladeck:

Stephen Vladeck is a professor of law at the American University Washington College of Law.

In a pair of decisions handed down last October and this January, respectively, the federal appeals court in Washington held that the military commissions at Guantanamo may not try individuals who are charged solely with "providing material support" to, or conspiring with, al Qaeda. Although these two offenses are well-established crimes under U.S. law, the D.C. Circuit held in its decisions in United States v. Hamdan and United States v. al-Bahlul that Congress in the Military Commissions Act of 2006 only authorized military trials for recognized war crimes under international law—which conspiracy and material support are not. Thus, in the first two post-conviction appeals under the 2006 statute, the government had two convictions reversed. And although the government asked the full D.C. Circuit late last week to reconsider these decisions, it seems likely that such a request will be denied—and that this reasoning will be left intact going forward.

It's hard to overstate the significance of these decisions to the ongoing debate over whether the U.S. government should prosecute terrorism suspects in Article III civilian courts or in military commissions. To date, this debate has taken place largely on policy terms—contrasting the ability (and stability) of our ordinary Article III civilian courts with the special security and secrecy measures the government could rely upon in military commission proceedings at Guantanamo. But whether one supported civilian or military trials for terrorism suspects, it was hard to disagree that the alternative was at least formally available.

[See a collection of political cartoons on defense spending.]

The D.C. Circuit's decisions in the Hamdan and al-Bahlul cases necessarily change the terms of that conversation. Now, not only is the government precluded from trying conspiracy and material support offenses at Guantanamo, the door has also flung open for broader challenges to the jurisdiction of the commissions—and to limiting the commissions to trying only those offenses that are not just crimes, but well-established war crimes, such as the September 11 attacks themselves. Thus, whenever the government arrests a terrorism suspect like Sulaiman Abu Ghaith, who, despite his misdeeds, cannot be tied directly to specific acts of international terrorism, the choice between civilian courts and military commissions has already been made for them.

Tags:
Guantánamo Bay,
terrorism,
military courts,
courts
Other Arguments
#1

Yes — Illegitimate military commission trials breed more enemies and cause more terrorism

DAPHNE EVIATAR, Senior Counsel Associated with Human Rights First's Law & Security Program

#2
#3

No — Terrorists like Sulaiman Abu Ghaith don't have constitutional rights

DANNY GONZALEZ, Director of Communications for Move America Forward

#3
#6

Yes — Federal court is best for Abu Ghaith, but military commissions still have their use

DANIEL J. GALLINGTON, Senior Policy and Program Adviser at the George C. Marshall Institute

#7

No — Terrorists like Sulaiman Abu Ghaith shouldn't be tried like common criminals

MIKE ROGERS, Chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence

Reader Comments ()

About Debate Club

A meeting of the sharpest minds on the day's most important topics, Debate Club brings in the best arguments and lets readers decide which is the most persuasive. Read the arguments, then vote. And be sure to check back often to see who has gotten the most support—and also to see what's being discussed now in the Debate Club.

Have ideas about what the Club should be debating? E-mail it to dclub@usnews.com.

You can also join the debate on Facebook or follow Debate Club on Twitter.

Advertisement
Cartoons
Thomas Jefferson Street Blog
Obamacare Opponents Have to Keep Pushing Repeal

The way to repeal Obamacare is to hasten its ugly results.

Can Obama's Berlin Speech Match John F. Kennedy's and Ronald Reagan's?

The two famous Berlin speeches almost never were.

Reform Conservatives Need to Tackle Unemployment and Jobs

"Reform conservatives" are doing good work, but need to think about the ills of long-term unemployment.

If Background Checks are Good Enough for Guns, They're Good Enough for Jobs

Employers need to be able to consider all factors before making a hire.

NSA Leaker Edward Snowden Is Neither a Whistle-Blower Nor a Civil Disobeyer

Resisters who break a law must accept that they may be arrested and have a duty to submit to punishment.

Obama Should Bring Small Business Owners on His Trip to Africa

This country needs a national reality show.

Russian President Vladimir Putin’s Divorce and Robert Kraft’s Super Bowl Ring

What took Lyudmila Putina so long?

Syria, Israel and the Obama Administration's Absentee Foreign Policy

Creating a mess you are going to leave for someone else to clean up is not a good way to manage U.S. foreign policy.

Advertisement