Debate Club

Is the Democratic Party's Gay Marriage Platform Good Politics?

The Democratic National Committee recently announced that gay marriage will be included in the party platform for the first time ever. The party embrace of same-sex marriage comes after President Barack Obama officially announced his support in May.

The president had largely been mum on the politically charged issue, and some see his endorsement as a campaign move in the extremely heated election season. Official party inclusion of gay marriage could both help turn out donors and energize voters for Obama and the Democrats, but could also alienate other portions of the Democratic base. African-Americans and Latinos, both more socially conservative groups, largely lean Democratic but have historically been more likely to oppose same-sex marriage.

The Republican Party and its presumptive presidential nominee Mitt Romney do not endorse gay marriage, and instead say they support "traditional marriage," or defining marriage as being between a man and a woman. The party has supported amendments around the country restricting the definition of marriage as such.

Nationally, popular support for gay marriage has increased, but official Democratic endorsement is unlikely to make a large difference in the election because supporters are already likely to vote Democratic anyway. The 2012 presidential campaign has also mainly focused on the still-struggling economy, as high unemployment and a weak housing market remain Americans' greatest concerns.

The Arguments

#1
261 Pts

No — Gay marriage endorsement will jeopardize Democrats in the House and Senate

FORD O'CONNELL, Republican Strategist, Conservative Activist, and Political Analyst Comment (7)

#4
73 Pts

Yes — Democratic policy now recognizes the widespread popular support for gay marriage

STACEY LONG, Director of Public Policy and Government Affairs at the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force Comment (1)

#5
-74 Pts

No — The Democrats' move is politically correct but not politically smart

PETER SPRIGG, Senior Fellow for Policy Studies at the Family Research Council Comment (15)

About Debate Club

A meeting of the sharpest minds on the day's most important topics, Debate Club brings in the best arguments and lets readers decide which is the most persuasive. Read the arguments, then vote. And be sure to check back often to see who has gotten the most support—and also to see what's being discussed now in the Debate Club.

Have ideas about what the Club should be debating? E-mail it to dclub@usnews.com.

You can also join the debate on Facebook or follow Debate Club on Twitter.

Advertisement
Cartoons
Thomas Jefferson Street Blog
Obamacare Opponents Have to Keep Pushing Repeal

The way to repeal Obamacare is to hasten its ugly results.

Can Obama's Berlin Speech Match John F. Kennedy's and Ronald Reagan's?

The two famous Berlin speeches almost never were.

Reform Conservatives Need to Tackle Unemployment and Jobs

"Reform conservatives" are doing good work, but need to think about the ills of long-term unemployment.

If Background Checks are Good Enough for Guns, They're Good Enough for Jobs

Employers need to be able to consider all factors before making a hire.

NSA Leaker Edward Snowden Is Neither a Whistle-Blower Nor a Civil Disobeyer

Resisters who break a law must accept that they may be arrested and have a duty to submit to punishment.

Obama Should Bring Small Business Owners on His Trip to Africa

This country needs a national reality show.

Russian President Vladimir Putin’s Divorce and Robert Kraft’s Super Bowl Ring

What took Lyudmila Putina so long?

Syria, Israel and the Obama Administration's Absentee Foreign Policy

Creating a mess you are going to leave for someone else to clean up is not a good way to manage U.S. foreign policy.

Advertisement