Debate Club

Obama Can't Make Recess Appointments Without a Recess

By SHARE

On Tuesday, the Senate gaveled in to start the second session of the 112nd Congress. On Wednesday, Obama declared the Senate to be in recess so he could "recess appoint" Richard Cordray to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and radical union lawyers to the National Labor Relations Board. He called them "recess appointments" even though the Senate was not in recess. It's ridiculous.

[Join the debate on Facebook.]

Some previous presidents have made aggressive use of the recess appointment power, including President Bush. But this is the crucial point: They made those recess appointments when the Senate was actually in recess.

The Constitution is clear that a Senate recess cannot occur without the consent of the House. Article I, Section 5 says: "Neither House, during the Session of Congress, shall, without the Consent of the other, adjourn for more than three days."

[Senate Left Obama With No Choice Over Richard Cordray Appointment.]

Even Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan agrees, as she explained on April 26, 2010: "Although a President may fill such vacancies through the use of his recess appointment power … the Senate may act to foreclose this option by declining to recess for more than two or three days at a time over a lengthy period. For example, the Senate did not recess intrasession for more than three days at a time for over a year beginning in late 2007."

Just like Democrats in 2007, Republicans have not called a recess. Yet apparently our president believes that justifies shredding the Constitution and deciding for himself when the Senate is or isn't in recess.

It's an absurd argument and it shouldn't stand up in court.

Phil Kerpen

About Phil Kerpen Vice President for Policy at Americans for Prosperity

Tags
Obama, Barack
Obama administration
Congress
consumers
Republican Party

Other Arguments

#2
27 Pts
The President Abused His Power

No – The President Abused His Power

Elizabeth Garvey Legal Policy Analyst in the Heritage Foundation's Center for Legal & Judicial Studies

#3
27 Pts
Obama's Power Grab Sets Precedent Democrats Will Regret

No – Obama's Power Grab Sets Precedent Democrats Will Regret

John Berlau Director of the Center for Investors and Entrepreneurs at the Competitive Enterprise Institute

#4
15 Pts
Legal and Historical Precedent Are on Obama's Side

Yes – Legal and Historical Precedent Are on Obama's Side

David Arkush Director of the Congress Watch Division of Public Citizen

#5
-14 Pts
Obama Deserves Praise for Keeping GOP in Check

Yes – Obama Deserves Praise for Keeping GOP in Check

Ian Millhiser Policy Analyst with the Center for American Progress and Editor of ThinkProgress Justice

#6
-39 Pts
Cordray Has Received Bipartisan Support

Yes – Cordray Has Received Bipartisan Support

Reid Cramer Director of the Asset Building Program at the New America Foundation

You Might Also Like


See More