Is Obama Turning the Economy Around? >
Obama's Policies Have Not Turned the Economy Around
Our economy remains dramatically weaker than it should be
March 13, 2012
About William W. Beach:
William Beach is the director of The Heritage Foundation's Center for Data Analysis.
President Obama insists that his policies are producing a robust economic recovery. However, public opinion polls and recent election results underscore a very different perception: Working Americans see an economy still deeply depressed in key sectors and much slower everywhere than it should be. In short, the president's policies have not turned the economy around.
Where are we today compared to the other, big recession of the post-World War II period, the early 1980s? One way to answer that is to compare the two recessions calendar quarter by calendar quarter. Start with the '80s one. At its worst point—seven quarters after the recession started—the economy was just as weak as the worst days of the recent recession.
[See pictures of Obama's re-election campaign.]
Today, we are 17 quarters from the beginning of the recession that started in December 2007. At this point in the 1980s, the economy was well on its way to normal levels: Output had stormed back to near normal levels; GDP growth without inflation averaged 4.9 percent during the recovery period. The unemployment rate was in the low 6 percent range by the 17th quarter and would get to 5.6 percent by the end of that year, 1987.
By contrast, our economy today, 17 quarters after the start the recent recession, remains dramatically weaker than it should be. Real GDP growth over the current "recovery" has averaged only 2.5 percent and the unemployment rate stands at a very high 8.3 percent—well above the normal, full-employment rate of 5.5 percent. Millions of people lack work and, more importantly, they have little prospect of finding employment.
[Obama Campaign Movie Focuses on Osama bin Laden Raid.]
These numbers starkly indict the president's economic recovery program. Unprecedented deficit spending has created ballooning federal debt that itself now slows the economy. Rather than lighten regulations and lower taxes as President Reagan did in the 1980s, this president has launched a massive expansion of regulations (106 major rules over three years compared to 28 for President Bush), which discourages entrepreneurship, investment, and innovation. And, in the midst of all these failing grades in economic stewardship, the president urges voters to support his plans for more regulation, higher gas prices, and higher taxes.
Obviously, we should do just the opposite—and quickly. Even suggesting that taxes will rise and regulations will grow harms our economic prospects, and more debt further burdens our prospects for recovery. Truth is, working Americans have figured this out. The big economic question of the day is, will President Obama?
- Join the debate on Facebook.
- Follow U.S. News Debate Club on Twitter.
- Check out U.S. News Weekly: an insider's guide to politics and policy.
- Other Arguments
-
#132145
No — Obama is continuing the failed statist policies of his predecessor
DANIEL MITCHELL, Senior Fellow at the Cato Institute
-
#214354
No — Voters should forget the short-term economic picture and focus on what the president has not done for us lately
DAVID PRIMO, Author of 'Rules and Restraint: Government Spending the Design of Institutions'
-
#482225
Yes — Because of Obama's policies, the U.S. has added 3.5 million jobs since February 2010
ANDREW FIELDHOUSE, Federal Budget Policy Analyst at the Economic Policy Institute
-
#576231
Yes — Make no mistake, there has been sure and steady progress in the economy
HEATHER BOUSHEY, Senior Economist at the Center for American Progress
-
#649255
Yes — President could have done even more, but stimulus plan did help create nearly 3 million jobs
DEAN BAKER, Author of 'The End of Loser Liberalism: Making Markets Progressive'
