Debate Club

Obama Deserves Credit for the Recovery

By + More

There should be little doubt that President Obama deserves credit for what recovery we are seeing, although he also must share in the blame for it not being faster. The basic story of this downturn is very simple: There was a plunge in private sector demand following the collapse of the housing bubble.

The $8 trillion housing bubble had generated more than $1 trillion in annual demand both from its direct impact on construction and through the effect that bubble-inflated house prices had in spurring consumption. When this bubble burst, there was nothing to replace this gap in demand.

[See pictures of Obama's re-election campaign.]

This is where the stimulus came in. The government had to fill the gap in demand. This fact has nothing to do with how much we like the government compared with the private sector. Private businesses were not about to increase their investment by $1 trillion (this would be doubling annual investment) at a time when the economy was in the tank. That doesn't make any sense.

President Obama's stimulus helped fill the gap in demand. At this point there have been numerous studies by independent economists, including the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office, almost all of which find that the stimulus created between 2 million and 3 million jobs. This was an important boost to the economy at a time when it desperately needed it. It is important to remember that President Obama had to push through this stimulus over the near-unanimous opposition of the Republicans in Congress.

[Ignore the 2012 Polls, Obama-Romney Will Be Close.]

The contrary claims by Republicans that the stimulus blocked recovery literally do not make any sense. Is there any employer anywhere who didn't hire workers because stimulus money allowed state and local governments to keep teachers and firefighters employed? Is there a restaurant or factory that cancelled expansion plans because roads and bridges in the area were being repaired?

There can be times when excessive government spending can slow private sector expansion by pushing up interest rates and crowding out private investment. However, with interest rates near 60-year lows, this is clearly not one of those times.

If President Obama deserves blame, it is for not making the stimulus larger and having it last longer. The stimulus was only around $300 billion a year at its peak in 2009 and 2010. It had to counteract a loss in annual private sector demand of more than $1 trillion. Put another way, it created 3 million jobs in an economy where we needed 10 million. The 3 million jobs is a step in the right direction, but not nearly enough.

Dean Baker

About Dean Baker Author of 'The End of Loser Liberalism: Making Markets Progressive'

Tags
Obama, Barack
Obama administration
economy

Other Arguments

#1
281 Pts
Obama Has Tried All the Wrong Policies

No – Obama Has Tried All the Wrong Policies

Daniel Mitchell Senior Fellow at the Cato Institute

#2
94 Pts
It's Not the Economy, Stupid--It's Entitlement Spending

No – It's Not the Economy, Stupid--It's Entitlement Spending

David Primo Author of 'Rules and Restraint: Government Spending the Design of Institutions'

#3
63 Pts
Obama's Policies Have Not Turned the Economy Around

No – Obama's Policies Have Not Turned the Economy Around

William W. Beach Director of the Center for Data Analysis at The Heritage Foundation

#4
-143 Pts
President Obama's Policies Revived the Economy

Yes – President Obama's Policies Revived the Economy

Andrew Fieldhouse Federal Budget Policy Analyst at the Economic Policy Institute

#5
-153 Pts
Obama's American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Has Been a Success

Yes – Obama's American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Has Been a Success

Heather Boushey Senior Economist at the Center for American Progress

You Might Also Like


See More