Debate Club

Is Obama to Blame for High Gas Prices? >

The U.S. Can't Control the World Oil Market

We need to prepare for a world with permanently higher gasoline prices

March 2, 2012

About Severin Borenstein:

Severin Borenstein is E.T. Grether Professor of Business Economics and Public Policy at U.C. Berkeley's Haas School of Business and co-director of the Energy Institute at Haas. He teaches course in microeconomics and energy markets and has published numerous papers on oil and gasoline markets.

Oil prices drive gasoline prices and current oil prices are high. But $125 per barrel oil today is no more the fault of President Obama than $147 oil was President Bush's fault in June 2008. There is very little the U.S. president can do to change oil prices over months or a few years. U.S. oil production was up 13 percent in 2011 over 2008, but still remains less than one-tenth of the world oil market.

[What Obama and Ben Bernanke Should Do About Gas Prices.]

Producing more oil domestically will enrich the U.S. economy, particularly U.S. oil companies and their workers. With oil so valuable, it may be a good idea, though the value must be weighed against environmental consequences. But it will have no discernible impact on gas prices, because it will change the world's supply/demand balance for oil by less than 2 or 3 percent over a decade or more.

In fact, the impact on gas prices would probably be about the same as the recent increase in U.S. fuel economy standards will have over the next 20 years: somewhere between very little and none. The advantage of doubling fuel economy is that it will halve the cost of driving even if it has no impact on gas prices.

[Republicans Aggressively Gouging Obama Over Gas Prices.]

Many on the left, and a few on the right, argue that misguided or nefarious speculation in oil futures markets has driven oil prices well above their true competitive level. The claim, however, is rejected by nearly all economists across a broad range of political perspectives, from Paul Krugman to the Heritage Foundation. Speculation can cause short-run increases in oil price—on the order of days or weeks—but eventually if the price doesn't equate real physical demand with real physical supply, a massive buildup of inventories puts downward pressure on prices.

So what does drive the price of oil and therefore gasoline? The real physical suppliers do, especially Saudi Arabia. The Saudis hold more spare capacity today than the U.S. could bring online in the next decade even if all federal lands were opened to drilling. Likewise, the factors that drive the physical demand for oil, particularly the growing demand from China, India, and other developing countries, push up U.S. gas prices.

[How High Gas Prices Could Help Obama.]

Those factors aren't going to change anytime soon. Even with the new drilling technologies, most oil production and the vast majority of reserves will remain in the Middle East and Africa. And the growth of oil demand from the developing world is much more likely to accelerate than abate. We need to adapt to this changing world, hoping that new supplies keep prices under control, but preparing for a world with permanently higher gasoline prices. Nothing the politicians are going to say or do will change those hard realities.

Tags:
Barack Obama,
Obama administration
Other Arguments
#1

Yes — The administration has done little to reduce oil prices

DANIEL SIMMONS, Director of State Affairs at the Institute for Energy Research

#2
#3
#4

No — Only by lowering our gasoline and oil consumption can we protect against high gas prices

DAVID FRIEDMAN, Senior Engineer and Deputy Director of the Union of Concerned Scientists' Clean Vehicles Program

#5
#7

No — Much is out of the president's hands, but what he can do he must do better

NICOLAS LORIS, Policy Analyst in the Roe Institute for Economic Policy Studies at the Heritage Foundation

About Debate Club

A meeting of the sharpest minds on the day's most important topics, Debate Club brings in the best arguments and lets readers decide which is the most persuasive. Read the arguments, then vote. And be sure to check back often to see who has gotten the most support—and also to see what's being discussed now in the Debate Club.

Have ideas about what the Club should be debating? E-mail it to dclub@usnews.com.

You can also join the debate on Facebook or follow Debate Club on Twitter.

Advertisement
Cartoons
Thomas Jefferson Street Blog
IRS, AP and Benghazi Show the Failure of Obama's Big Government

Giving an inefficient organization like the IRS more responsibility makes it more likely to screw up, not better able to solve this nation’s problems.

Coburn Wants Oklahoma Tornado Aid Offset With Budget Cuts

Oklahoma Senator Tom Coburn wants spending cuts before aid is sent to tornado victims in his own state.

Crowdfunding Zack Braff's Film And Robert Griffin's Gifts Is a Mistake

Rich people don't need donations from the public.

Poll Shows Americans Find Obama's IRS Story Barely Believable

There is still something fishy about the scandal at the IRS.

Do Benghazi, AP and IRS Scandals Reflect Obama’s Leadership Style?

It may be that a flawed leadership style is filtering down to the rest of the government.

In Marine Umbrella Incident, Republicans Still Deny Obama Is President

Umbrellagate is more proof that Obama's critics cannot acknowledge that he is, indeed, president.

Obama Isn't Nixon, but Needs More Friends in Washington

President Barack Obama needs to make more friends in Washington.

Republicans Can't Forget the Economy During Obama Scandals

Scandals provide good fodder for the GOP, but it can't forget about fixing unemployment.

Advertisement