Debate Club

Is Obama to Blame for High Gas Prices? >

Obama Can Control Some Factors That Affect Oil Prices

Domestic energy production has increased despite president, not because of him

March 2, 2012

About Christopher Prandoni:

Christopher Prandoni serves as a federal affairs manager of Americans for Tax Reform and handles energy policy for the organization.

There are countless factors that affect oil prices, and some of them fall outside the president's immediate control, but to argue that an American president has zero ability to impact domestic gasoline prices is simply false. As most people know, the price of gasoline is largely determined by the price of oil. The recent increase in oil prices, and the subsequent increase in gasoline prices, is largely due to a potential disruption in the supply of Iranian oil—there has been no actual decline in international oil production. Conversely, allowing America's oil and natural gas producers to explore our vast oil reserves would absolutely quell concerns about future oil production, increase international spare capacity, and bring down the price of gasoline.

[What Obama and Ben Bernanke Should Do About Gas Prices.]

Under the Obama administration, consumers have seen a real increase in energy prices. The price of gasoline has increased by more than 90 percent. Last year, the average American household spent over 8 percent of its income on gasoline, the largest portion in three decades. Still, the president opposes oil and gas development here at home: Billions of barrels of oil contained in Alaska, America's West, and our Outer Continental Shelf are off-limits.

In the face of criticism, the president is quick to trumpet increased domestic oil production going on today. True, the U.S. is producing more of the energy we consume, but these trends stem from increased development of oil and natural gas on private and state lands—production on federal lands is declining.

[Has the 'Peak Oil' Tipping Point Arrived?]

Only about a third as many offshore drilling permits are being issued compared to historical averages, and the approval process takes nearly three times as long. The president has publicly taken credit for natural gas development across the country, but most of the shale boom is due to technical innovation and exploration that began years ago. Finally, the Keystone XL pipeline would have created thousands of blue-collar jobs and increased America's energy security, had the president not killed the deal. Indeed, domestic energy production has increased despite President Obama, not because of him.

Far from facilitating domestic production, President Obama has threatened to cripple America's job creators by repealing standard cost recovery tax policies employed by oil and natural gas producers. Raising oil and natural gas producers' taxes by $90 billion would force these employers to delay or scrap future projects—outcomes that can only increase the price of oil.

[Why the Economic Recovery Might Be Real This Time.]

The complexity of the energy markets makes it impossible to pin the blame of high gas prices squarely on President Obama. But by the same token, the president has largely squandered the options available to him, and now advocates policies that would only take the country in the wrong direction. Our energy policy needs to harness all our resources to position ourselves once more as a global leader of innovation and growth.

Tags:
gas prices,
Barack Obama,
Obama administration
Other Arguments
#1

Yes — The administration has done little to reduce oil prices

DANIEL SIMMONS, Director of State Affairs at the Institute for Energy Research

#2
#4

No — Only by lowering our gasoline and oil consumption can we protect against high gas prices

DAVID FRIEDMAN, Senior Engineer and Deputy Director of the Union of Concerned Scientists' Clean Vehicles Program

#5
#6

No — We need to prepare for a world with permanently higher gasoline prices

SEVERIN BORENSTEIN, E.T. Grether Professor of Business Economics and Public Policy at U.C. Berkeley's Haas School of Business

#7

No — Much is out of the president's hands, but what he can do he must do better

NICOLAS LORIS, Policy Analyst in the Roe Institute for Economic Policy Studies at the Heritage Foundation

About Debate Club

A meeting of the sharpest minds on the day's most important topics, Debate Club brings in the best arguments and lets readers decide which is the most persuasive. Read the arguments, then vote. And be sure to check back often to see who has gotten the most support—and also to see what's being discussed now in the Debate Club.

Have ideas about what the Club should be debating? E-mail it to dclub@usnews.com.

You can also join the debate on Facebook or follow Debate Club on Twitter.

Advertisement
Cartoons
Thomas Jefferson Street Blog
President Obama's Code Pink Heckler Medea Benjamin Was Plain Rude

It's become acceptable for people to interrupt the president while he is delivering a formal speech on a deadly serious topic.

Obama Commerce Nominee Penny Pritzker’s Tax Problem

Obama’s Commerce Department nominee has some Romney-esque tax issues.

Oklahoma Tornado Reminds Us of the Value of Teachers

The Oklahoma tornado reminds us of all the roles teachers take on.

IRS, AP and James Rosen Scandals Strike at the First Amendment

The Obama scandals paint a picture of an administration at odds with the First Amendment.

Anthony Weiner Is Too Liberal to Be New York City Mayor

New York City doesn't need another Democratic mayor.

Organizations Masquerading as Tax-Exempt is the Real IRS Scandal

The real scandal at the IRS is electioneering groups getting tax-exempt status.

E.W. Jackson Proves the Tea Party Learned Nothing

By nominating E.W. Jackson, Virginia Republicans hope extremism will save them.

IRS, AP and Benghazi Are Not Obama Scandals

The word "scandal" doesn't appropriately describe anything going on in Washington these days.

Advertisement