Debate Club

Is Newt Gingrich Right About Immigration? >

Newt Gingrich Faces the Facts of Immigration

Former speaker's honesty is refreshing, no matter what his GOP rivals say

November 30, 2011

About Tamar Jacoby:

Tamar Jacoby, a fellow at the New America Foundation, is president of ImmigrationWorks USA, a national federation of small business owners working for better immigration law.

It's not a good sign when even the most obvious truths cannot be spoken on the campaign trail.

Deport 11 million illegal immigrants? Can Newt Gingrich really be the only Republican presidential candidate who understands that this would be impossible?

Not only would it cost tens of billions of dollars and divert resources from many far more pressing law enforcement priorities, but even the toughest of presidents would soon back off as the media images of mass round-ups beamed around the world—that really is not the kind of country most Americans want to be or live in.

[Read Ken Walsh's Washington: Gingrich Faces Backlash From the Right on Immigration.]

Gingrich's presidential rivals denounced him for speaking this truth. Mitt Romney called Newt's proposal for grappling with illegal immigration amnesty. But Romney and the others offered no alternatives. Their solution for the 11 million? The status quo.

What these other candidates don't seem to recognize: The status quo is amnesty—de facto amnesty. As Romney himself described it (he thought he was describing Gingrich's plan): "people who come here illegally ... get to stay illegally for the rest of their life."

[Read U.S. News's Debate Club: Should the United States build a fence on its southern border?]

Gingrich's solution isn't perfect—no answer is. The millions of unauthorized immigrants living among us but beyond the rule of the law are the product of decades of hypocritical, unrealistic policy. And any effort to get a grip now is going to require some hardheaded tradeoffs. But at least Gingrich is owning up to the problem and trying to grapple with it honestly.

He's not the first Republican to face the facts about immigration—the dilemmas posed by the illegal millions in our midst or the economy's continuing need for foreign workers, skilled and unskilled. The stance Gingrich staked out last week recalled those endorsed in the past by Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush.

But then, if today's ideological litmus tests had been in place when Reagan and Bush were running for president, both probably would have been disqualified by their positions on immigration.

Hats off to Newt Gingrich. He may or may not survive this. But at least he's been courageous enough to be honest about what the problem is—surely the minimum we should ask of any would-be president.

Tags:
immigration reform,
Newt Gingrich
Other Arguments
#1

No — Immigrant bashing is not humane, moderate, or good for the U.S.

CHRIS NEWMAN, Legal Director and General Counsel at the National Day Laborer Organizing Network

#2

No — Former speaker's "progressive" plan just a sign of how anti-immigration the GOP has become

MARSHALL FITZ, Director of Immigration Policy at the Center for American Progress

#3
#4

Yes — Gingrich asks Republicans to have an open and honest dialogue

LUIS ALVARADO, Strategic Advisor for Revolvis Consulting

#6

No — Unrealistic criteria for amnesty would almost surely be watered down, making matters worse

MARK KRIKORIAN, Author of 'The New Case Against Immigration, Both Legal and Illegal' and 'How Obama is Transforming America Through Immigration'

About Debate Club

A meeting of the sharpest minds on the day's most important topics, Debate Club brings in the best arguments and lets readers decide which is the most persuasive. Read the arguments, then vote. And be sure to check back often to see who has gotten the most support—and also to see what's being discussed now in the Debate Club.

Have ideas about what the Club should be debating? E-mail it to dclub@usnews.com.

You can also join the debate on Facebook or follow Debate Club on Twitter.

Advertisement
Cartoons
Thomas Jefferson Street Blog
E.W. Jackson Proves the Tea Party Learned Nothing

By nominating E.W. Jackson, Virginia Republicans hope extremism will save them.

IRS, AP and Benghazi Are Not Obama Scandals

The word "scandal" doesn't appropriately describe anything going on in Washington these days.

Democrats Should Be Worried About Polls After Obama Scandals

Democrats should be more worried about President Obama's approval ratings.

Tea Party IRS Rally Should Wait Until After Moore Tornado Recovery

Tea party rallies against the IRS should wait until the tornado victims are taken care of.

God Bless America and the Boy Scouts

The Fund does the right thing by pushing the Boy Scouts to lift its ban on gay members.

IRS, AP and Benghazi Show the Failure of Obama's Big Government

Giving an inefficient organization like the IRS more responsibility makes it more likely to screw up, not better able to solve this nation’s problems.

Coburn Wants Oklahoma Tornado Aid Offset With Budget Cuts

Oklahoma Senator Tom Coburn wants spending cuts before aid is sent to tornado victims in his own state.

Crowdfunding Zack Braff's Film And Robert Griffin's Gifts Is a Mistake

Rich people don't need donations from the public.

Advertisement