Debate Club

Is It Time to Drill in the Arctic Refuge? >

There Will Never Be a Time to Drill in ANWR

The oil and gas industry should be exploring alternative energy, not alternative lands

November 3, 2011

About William H. Meadows:

William H. "Bill" Meadows has been President of The Wilderness Society since 1996. He has been active in conservation for more than 30 years. He is a past Chairman of the Green Group, Chairman of the Board of the Campaign for America's Wilderness and the Partnership Project, and he also serves on the boards of the League of Conservation Voters and Island Press.

For many years now, politicians have used the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge as a rhetorical prop when talking about oil prices. "Oh, we would have cheaper gasoline, if only we could drill in the Arctic Refuge," more or less sums up the sentiment. Fortunately, there have been enough level-headed officials to more than counterbalance this thinking, and the refuge continues to be protected (which is what one would expect from a National Wildlife Refuge).

[Read about how competition impacts gas prices.]

Even so, year after year there are attempts to open the Arctic Refuge to oil rigs, pipelines, airstrips, and all of the other development that comes with them. Meanwhile, often from the same people arguing to drill the Arctic Refuge, we don't see fuel conservation measures or the pursuit of renewable, clean energy like wind and solar that can be produced without willingly destroying a national treasure.

The oil and gas industry is already sitting on tens of millions of acres of American land that it isn't using--and it has more than 7,000 final drilling permits sitting by unused. Clearly, the oil industry's problem is not a lack of access.

[Check out our Energy Intelligence blog.]

The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge is truly one of a kind. It is one of the few remaining intact ecosystems in the world--one of the last places on the planet that has not felt the heavy hand of industrialization. It is home to more than 100,000 caribou that make up the Porcupine caribou herd. These animals are the cultural lifeblood of the Gwich'in people and their primary food source. For the Gwich'in, the Arctic Refuge--specifically the coastal plain, where the caribou go to birth their calves--is the "sacred place where life begins." The coastal plain is also designated critical habitat for the threatened polar bear, and provides the most important land denning and nursery habitat in the United States for polar bears.

Putting a drill rig or pipeline in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge would be the willing destruction of an American treasure and, for the Gwich'in, and end to their way of life, which has spanned millennia.

There will never be a time to surrender and drill the Arctic Refuge. Now is the time to reduce fuel consumption and reinvest in clean, renewable energy that can power America, create jobs, and keep our national treasures intact.

Tags:
Arctic,
energy,
gas prices,
environment,
oil
Other Arguments
#1
#3

No — Opening ANWR to oil and gas drilling will irreparably damage the fragile tundra and its wildlife

DAN RITZMAN, Alaska Program Director for the Sierra Club's Resilient Habitats Campaign

#4

No — The Alaskan refuge belongs to the American people, not the oil industry

FRANCES BEINECKE, President of the Natural Resources Defense Council

#5
#6
#7
#8
#9

Yes — We want to reduce the nation's reliance on foreign oil

DAN SULLIVAN, Commissioner of the Alaska Department of Natural Resources

#10
#11

Yes — ANWR coastal plain has the highest potential for oil onshore in the U.S.

MARILYN CROCKETT, Executive Director of the Alaska Oil and Gas Association

#12

Yes — A long-term strategy for energy security must involve alternatives to petroleum-based fuels

ROBBIE DIAMOND, Founder, President and CEO of Securing America's Future Energy

#13

Reader Comments Read all comments (3)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Why not resort to the permanent fix to America’s addiction to oil by developing alternative fuel sources. To threaten this pristine natural wonder with drilling for oil will only make those who are filthy rich even richer, adding to the shameful economical imbalance in this country.

What amount of greed and total disregard for nature would have to be in one’s heart for them to agree to jeopardize a "natural treasure" because of their greed. Is our private sector and controlling families who own oil companies so insensitive that they value the preservation of nature less than helping the oil industry? Did they see what happened with the Exxon Valdez oil spill in Prince William Sound, Alaska, on March 24, 1989? Or the April 2010 explosion and sinking of the Deepwater Horizon, that killed 11 men and unleashed an 87-day oil spill causing 7.8 billion in damages. Why create the slightest possibility this happening in the Arctic Refuge?

The Palin’s, the Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, of the world knows that if our country moves away from oil as a central source of energy those families that grease their palms would grease their palms less.

Those manufacturers who are fat with American dollars from robbing the middle class through excessive price gouging and jacked up gas store prices. For all you citizens / politicians that say "yes" do you realize that the only benefit for the middle class will be to continue to drive oil dependant cars and be slaves to the oil industry as we cater to the 1%. I suggest that the justice department investigate the potential of bribe by the oil company of anyone/ citizens or politicians that is so senselessly greedy as to not want to create clean jobs and protect the environment in one swoop by moving to the President’s plan to develop alternative sources. People the effects of digging America up for Oil is Dangerous but the aspect of waking America up and putting us to work lessening our dependency on oil is brilliant, its win win. M.G. WSNC

M G WSNC of NC 3:39AM March 05, 2012

The drilling area needed is the size of Dulles Airport, making your point moot. Also, you mean like Great Britain, Germany and Spain have done?

http://charlestonteaparty.org/?p=34662&preview=true

poet756 of SC 4:30PM February 19, 2012

Bill, Bill, Bill... I shouldn't be surprised, but it evokes strong emotions for many of us when someone (especially someone in a ranking position such as yours) puts into print such bold-faced lies. It's understandable that most of the anti-ANWR spokespeople will do the same. They count on the masses to accept what you say is fact, and not do any research of their own. The 1002 area of ANWR is not where the Porcupine herd go to birth their calves. It is a small portion of the refuge at the edge of their vast migratory pattern. Drilling in this small area will not be the "destruction" of caribou, polar bears, or anyone's way of life. See: Prudhoe Bay.

Especially irritating was your statement, "Putting a drill rig or pipeline in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge would be the willing destruction of an American treasure and, for the Gwich'in, and end to their way of life, which has spanned millennia."

I have great respect for the Native peoples of Alaska, but when it comes to the Gwich'in, and people using phrases such as the "sacred place where life begins," in their defense, I have to choke back the taste of bile in the back of my throat. Their's is an exercise in hypocrisy, and you again count on the ignorance of the masses. The Gwich'in leaders opted not to join in the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA), which would have meant sharing resources from their land with the other tribes in the settlement. Instead they chose to keep these resourses for themselves, and actively drilled for oil ALL THROUGHOUT ANWR! Unfortunately, they found little to nothing. They weren't concerned for the caribou at that time, even though they were drilling directly in the heart of their "sacred place."

Mr. Meadows, you are not alone in trying to rewrite history, distort facts and misrepresent what ANWR is. Most every anti-ANWR developer does the same. They mix concepts of fantasy and fact together to draw followers. No, ANWR oil will not solve all the U.S.'s energy problems, but it will help. Yes, we should invest in alternative energies, and yes we should reduce fuel consumption, but not exploring, and not drilling in this small area of the refuge is not the way to accomplish those things. Lying about oil exploration in ANWR is definitely not the way.

It does surprise me that more people don't research the facts about all this.

Bert of AK 8:19AM November 08, 2011

About Debate Club

A meeting of the sharpest minds on the day's most important topics, Debate Club brings in the best arguments and lets readers decide which is the most persuasive. Read the arguments, then vote. And be sure to check back often to see who has gotten the most support—and also to see what's being discussed now in the Debate Club.


Have ideas about what the Club should be debating? E-mail it to dclub@usnews.com.


You can also join the debate on Facebook or follow Debate Club on Twitter.

Advertisement
Cartoons
Thomas Jefferson Street Blog
Obama's Remarkable Silence on Latin American Press Abuses

President Obama's silence on press freedom in Latin America is troubling.

Why the Media Is Giving Romney a Pass on Trump's Birtherism

Why the media hasn't pressed Mitt Romney about Donald Trump's birther fantasies.

Romney's Bain Experience Wasn't Real American Capitalism

The fact that Bain Capital served to make money for investors, not to create jobs, could endanger Romney.

Why Is Mitt Romney Embracing Birther Donald Trump?

Maybe Trump is Romney's idea of a rich guy that common people can relate to?

Does Barack Obama Actually Want to Be Re-Elected?

The president's lack of enthusiasm jeopardizes his campaign.

3 Reasons Why the Scott Walker Wisconsin Recall Election Matters

Scott Walker is a canary in a coal mine.

The Right's Fixation With 'Vetting' Obama

American voters can use the past four years to judge Obama's qualifications as president

Voters Tuning Out Flood of 2012 Super PAC, Campaign Ads

This will be the year of grassroots voters, not Nielsen families.

Advertisement