Debate Club

Is It Time to Drill in the Arctic Refuge? >

Drilling in ANWR Will Not Solve Our National Energy Crisis

Oil speculated to be beneath the Arctic Refuge would add less than 1 percent to global oil production

November 3, 2011

About Cindy Shogan:

Cindy Shogan has been the Executive Director of the Alaska Wilderness League since 1998. Cindy received the Wilburforce Foundation's Conservation Leadership Award in August 2003. She has previously worked for Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, Defenders of Wildlife, the Izaak Walton League, and the Sierra Club.

For decades, drilling proponents have touted drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge as the answer to the national crisis du jour. Today, facing three national crises--energy, jobs, and the deficit--the sad truth is that Arctic Refuge drilling will do nothing to alleviate any of these crucial challenges, despite what Big Oil and its supporters will tell you.

Here are three indisputable facts:

  • Oil prices are set on a global oil market, and the amount of oil speculated to be found beneath the Arctic Refuge's coastal plain would add less than 1 percent to total oil production. And, as the government's Energy Information Administration noted in a 2008 report, OPEC could just turn the spigot a little higher to eradicate any slight increase in U.S. production that might come from the Arctic Refuge.
  • Any claims about job growth from domestic drilling are met with this stark reality: The top five largest oil companies have actually cut their work force by 11,200 employees in the past five years, despite the fact that this country is producing more oil and gas now than at any other time in our history. And, they are making record profits.
  • Estimates of revenue generated from drilling in the Arctic Refuge are wildly speculative and hugely inflated. According to a 2008 Congressional Research Service report, any revenue estimates from Arctic Refuge drilling are "highly uncertain" and "subject to major limitations."

[Check out our Energy Intelligence blog.]

And then there's this fact: Some places are just too extraordinary to drill--and the Arctic Refuge is one of them. For 30 years, pro-drilling proponents have been pushing to drill in the Arctic Refuge, and for 30 years millions of Americans have stood up and said "No way!" The Arctic Refuge--with its vast expanse of divergent terrain, and the abundant wildlife that depends on it--is our nation's greatest wilderness icon. We have a moral responsibility to save wild places like the Arctic Refuge for future generations, which is why our country has remained committed to its protection for over a half century.

The Arctic Refuge is one place that must remain off-limits to drilling--now and forever.

Tags:
Arctic,
environment,
energy,
gas prices,
oil
Other Arguments
#1
#2
#3

No — Opening ANWR to oil and gas drilling will irreparably damage the fragile tundra and its wildlife

DAN RITZMAN, Alaska Program Director for the Sierra Club's Resilient Habitats Campaign

#4

No — The Alaskan refuge belongs to the American people, not the oil industry

FRANCES BEINECKE, President of the Natural Resources Defense Council

#6
#7
#8
#9

Yes — We want to reduce the nation's reliance on foreign oil

DAN SULLIVAN, Commissioner of the Alaska Department of Natural Resources

#10
#11

Yes — ANWR coastal plain has the highest potential for oil onshore in the U.S.

MARILYN CROCKETT, Executive Director of the Alaska Oil and Gas Association

#12

Yes — A long-term strategy for energy security must involve alternatives to petroleum-based fuels

ROBBIE DIAMOND, Founder, President and CEO of Securing America's Future Energy

#13

Reader Comments Read all comments (3)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

NO - As one of the last, vast untrammeled areas left on the planet, the Arctic Refuge provides the world a vital connection to the natural world. A symbol of freedom and balance invaluable to the human spirit.

Katherine Krause of CA 11:21AM November 11, 2011

How come pollution expense is passed onto the government and tax payers to clean up? In a so called free market the industry responsible for the pollution is responsible for the clean up. Those pollution expenses should be accounted for on their bottom line, held against their net sales and reported to their shareholders and stock exchange. For too long the polluting industries, coal, oil, nuclear and gas have been able to hold those down stream costs off the books.

Its time for a true accounting one without corporate welfare, one that takes into account health cost, cancer rates and the impact on overall productivity, and other market sectors, as well as clean up, remediation, storage and preservation - then lets see just how "profitable" are the dirty industries.

We not only need a true accounting we need true accountability.

Paul Burke, Journey Home of VA 9:09AM November 04, 2011

Drilling in ANWR mat not solve Our national energy crisis but it will sure help the Americna people and lower the cost of fuel.

Larry of CA 5:03PM November 03, 2011

About Debate Club

A meeting of the sharpest minds on the day's most important topics, Debate Club brings in the best arguments and lets readers decide which is the most persuasive. Read the arguments, then vote. And be sure to check back often to see who has gotten the most support—and also to see what's being discussed now in the Debate Club.


Have ideas about what the Club should be debating? E-mail it to dclub@usnews.com.


You can also join the debate on Facebook or follow Debate Club on Twitter.

Advertisement
Cartoons
Thomas Jefferson Street Blog
Obama's Remarkable Silence on Latin American Press Abuses

President Obama's silence on press freedom in Latin America is troubling.

Why the Media Is Giving Romney a Pass on Trump's Birtherism

Why the media hasn't pressed Mitt Romney about Donald Trump's birther fantasies.

Romney's Bain Experience Wasn't Real American Capitalism

The fact that Bain Capital served to make money for investors, not to create jobs, could endanger Romney.

Why Is Mitt Romney Embracing Birther Donald Trump?

Maybe Trump is Romney's idea of a rich guy that common people can relate to?

Does Barack Obama Actually Want to Be Re-Elected?

The president's lack of enthusiasm jeopardizes his campaign.

3 Reasons Why the Scott Walker Wisconsin Recall Election Matters

Scott Walker is a canary in a coal mine.

The Right's Fixation With 'Vetting' Obama

American voters can use the past four years to judge Obama's qualifications as president

Voters Tuning Out Flood of 2012 Super PAC, Campaign Ads

This will be the year of grassroots voters, not Nielsen families.

Advertisement