Debate Club

Is It Time to Drill in the Arctic Refuge? >

Developing Domestic Oil Resources Is Part of the Solution

ANWR coastal plain has the highest potential for oil onshore in the U.S.

November 3, 2011

About Marilyn Crockett:

Marilyn Crockett is the Executive Director of the Alaska Oil and Gas Association (AOGA), and has been with the organization for more than 41 years. AOGA is a private nonprofit trade association whose 16 member companies account for the majority of oil and gas exploration, development, production, transportation, refining and marketing activities in Alaska. AOGA's mission is to foster the long-term viability of the oil and gas industry in Alaska.

In 1995, Congress approved drilling on the Coastal Plain--or 10-02 area--of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. Had President Clinton not vetoed that legislation, oil from the 10-02 area would be flowing through the Trans-Alaska Pipeline today, reducing the nation's dependence on foreign oil and fueling our economy with jobs and billions of dollars in tax and royalty revenues to state, local, and federal governments.

[See a collection of political cartoons on the economy.]

The coastal plain has the highest potential for oil onshore in the United States, up to 16 billion barrels, according to estimates by the U.S. Geological Survey. In comparison, since the 1970s, more than 16 billion barrels of oil have been produced from Alaska's North Slope. Oil production from the Coastal Plain could be expected to flow through TAPS for at least another 30 years.

The resources on the coastal plain are accessible and close to the largest oil field in the United States, Prudhoe Bay. Since satellite fields and feeder pipelines already exist within a few miles of ANWR's border, production could be flowing through TAPS much earlier than from other frontier areas. Moreover, development would occur on a minute portion of the refuge, 2,000 acres, or about one-tenth of 1-percent of the refuge's acreage.

[Read East Coast Oil Infrastructure Remains Vulnerable.]

The existing statutory and regulatory scheme requires companies working in Alaska to perform to the highest environmental standards in the world. In addition, new technologies such as 3D seismic and extended-reach drilling have significantly reduced surface footprints while reaching much larger subsurface areas. Fields can be developed using these technologies in combination with site-specific mitigation measures, further reducing environmental impacts.

In 2010, the U.S. consumed 19.1 million barrels of petroleum products per day, importing over 50 percent, costing hundreds of millions of dollars per day and resulting in the export of hundreds of thousands of jobs. While there is no single solution to meet these needs in the future, developing domestic oil resources should be part of the equation. Ignoring ANWR is short-sighted, dangerous and a drain on the U.S. economy. The time to drill ANWR is now.

Tags:
energy,
oil,
environment,
Arctic,
Arctic National Wildlife Refuge
Other Arguments
#1
#2
#3

No — Opening ANWR to oil and gas drilling will irreparably damage the fragile tundra and its wildlife

DAN RITZMAN, Alaska Program Director for the Sierra Club's Resilient Habitats Campaign

#4

No — The Alaskan refuge belongs to the American people, not the oil industry

FRANCES BEINECKE, President of the Natural Resources Defense Council

#5
#6
#7
#8
#9

Yes — We want to reduce the nation's reliance on foreign oil

DAN SULLIVAN, Commissioner of the Alaska Department of Natural Resources

#10
#12

Yes — A long-term strategy for energy security must involve alternatives to petroleum-based fuels

ROBBIE DIAMOND, Founder, President and CEO of Securing America's Future Energy

#13
About Debate Club

A meeting of the sharpest minds on the day's most important topics, Debate Club brings in the best arguments and lets readers decide which is the most persuasive. Read the arguments, then vote. And be sure to check back often to see who has gotten the most support—and also to see what's being discussed now in the Debate Club.

Have ideas about what the Club should be debating? E-mail it to dclub@usnews.com.

You can also join the debate on Facebook or follow Debate Club on Twitter.

Advertisement
Cartoons
Thomas Jefferson Street Blog
President Obama's Code Pink Heckler Medea Benjamin Was Plain Rude

It's become acceptable for people to interrupt the president while he is delivering a formal speech on a deadly serious topic.

Obama Commerce Nominee Penny Pritzker’s Tax Problem

Obama’s Commerce Department nominee has some Romney-esque tax issues.

Oklahoma Tornado Reminds Us of the Value of Teachers

The Oklahoma tornado reminds us of all the roles teachers take on.

IRS, AP and James Rosen Scandals Strike at the First Amendment

The Obama scandals paint a picture of an administration at odds with the First Amendment.

Anthony Weiner Is Too Liberal to Be New York City Mayor

New York City doesn't need another Democratic mayor.

Organizations Masquerading as Tax-Exempt is the Real IRS Scandal

The real scandal at the IRS is electioneering groups getting tax-exempt status.

E.W. Jackson Proves the Tea Party Learned Nothing

By nominating E.W. Jackson, Virginia Republicans hope extremism will save them.

IRS, AP and Benghazi Are Not Obama Scandals

The word "scandal" doesn't appropriately describe anything going on in Washington these days.

Advertisement