Debate Club

Is It Time to Drill in the Arctic Refuge? >

ANWR Is the Best Prospect for Onshore Domestic Oil Production

Every drop of oil we get from a U.S. well is one less dollar we send abroad

November 3, 2011

About Lisa Murkowski:

Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, is a ranking member of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee.

It's difficult to comprehend how some could still oppose the responsible development of our resources in the non-wilderness section of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. While Congress attempts to cut more than a trillion dollars from the federal budget, we are faced with record unemployment and a struggling national economy.

For far too long, we've kept these precious resources under lock and key, instead of using them to improve our energy security, create badly needed jobs, and provide revenue for the federal government.

[Read about how competition impacts gas prices.]

Our dependence on foreign oil comes at a staggering cost. Last year alone, we spent an estimated $337 billion on oil imports, impacting both our financial and national security.

But it doesn't have to be this way. By simply granting permission to develop a small amount of land in a remote part of Alaska, we could generate hundreds of billions of dollars in federal revenue without so much as raising a tax or cutting a program.

While we're not going to produce 100 percent of the oil we need, every drop we get from a U.S. well is one less dollar we send abroad and one less job we export. It's not a case of lacking the resources--we have, until now, simply lacked the political will.

The ANWR coastal plain--a 1.5 million-acre area that Congress set aside from the 19 million-acre refuge because of its oil and natural gas potential--has at least 6 billion barrels, and possibly 16 billion barrels, of recoverable oil. It is North America's single greatest prospect for increasing onshore domestic production.

For years, the debate over ANWR has centered on whether production can be done without harming the sensitive lands within the refuge. In truth, there's no reason for concern as we have been safely producing oil in the Arctic for more than 30 years, using the highest environmental standards.

Just about everyone agrees that much of ANWR--with its diverse wildlife and beautiful landscape--is worth preserving. But the area we're looking to open for production accounts for just 0.01 percent of the entire refuge.

[See a collection of political cartoons on gas prices.]

At today's oil prices, the federal government would receive an estimated $153 billion from lease bonuses, royalties, and taxes from the coastal plain. That's money we'd otherwise be leaving buried in the ground.

Now is the time to develop our domestic oil reserves in the coastal plain of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.

Tags:
Arctic,
oil,
gas prices,
energy,
economy,
environment
Other Arguments
#1
#2
#3

No — Opening ANWR to oil and gas drilling will irreparably damage the fragile tundra and its wildlife

DAN RITZMAN, Alaska Program Director for the Sierra Club's Resilient Habitats Campaign

#4

No — The Alaskan refuge belongs to the American people, not the oil industry

FRANCES BEINECKE, President of the Natural Resources Defense Council

#5
#6
#7
#8
#9

Yes — We want to reduce the nation's reliance on foreign oil

DAN SULLIVAN, Commissioner of the Alaska Department of Natural Resources

#10
#11

Yes — ANWR coastal plain has the highest potential for oil onshore in the U.S.

MARILYN CROCKETT, Executive Director of the Alaska Oil and Gas Association

#12

Yes — A long-term strategy for energy security must involve alternatives to petroleum-based fuels

ROBBIE DIAMOND, Founder, President and CEO of Securing America's Future Energy

Reader Comments Read all comments (11)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

"We have been safely producing oil in the arctic for more than 30 years," Really? Nevermind the Exxon Valdez.

"Money buried in the ground." You're right, and it is not going anywhere. It will always be there, but Alaska's vast unspoilt beauty won't because of shortsighted, impatient greed, whose agenda you are pushing.

Mike of NY 9:06PM April 28, 2012

I didn't know oil cost a dollar a drop....

Mikko of AZ 1:44PM February 20, 2012

You're either in the back pocket of the oil companies or you are incredibly naive! In either case, it is people like you that have driven Congress' approval ratings to the lowest point ever! The American people as a majority don't support "Drill, baby, drill!" We've seen what that's gotten us and where we are. All of the potential oil in ANWR (which would take years and years and much devastation to the natural environment to extract) would only fuel our oil thirst for a few months. Trade off? Destroy one of our most beautiful natural areas for short term avoidance of the need to develop alternative energies? Let me ask - do you drive a SUV?

Thomas Crickenberger of CA 11:01PM December 05, 2011

About Debate Club

A meeting of the sharpest minds on the day's most important topics, Debate Club brings in the best arguments and lets readers decide which is the most persuasive. Read the arguments, then vote. And be sure to check back often to see who has gotten the most support—and also to see what's being discussed now in the Debate Club.


Have ideas about what the Club should be debating? E-mail it to dclub@usnews.com.


You can also join the debate on Facebook or follow Debate Club on Twitter.

Advertisement
Cartoons
Thomas Jefferson Street Blog
Obama's Remarkable Silence on Latin American Press Abuses

President Obama's silence on press freedom in Latin America is troubling.

Why the Media Is Giving Romney a Pass on Trump's Birtherism

Why the media hasn't pressed Mitt Romney about Donald Trump's birther fantasies.

Romney's Bain Experience Wasn't Real American Capitalism

The fact that Bain Capital served to make money for investors, not to create jobs, could endanger Romney.

Why Is Mitt Romney Embracing Birther Donald Trump?

Maybe Trump is Romney's idea of a rich guy that common people can relate to?

Does Barack Obama Actually Want to Be Re-Elected?

The president's lack of enthusiasm jeopardizes his campaign.

3 Reasons Why the Scott Walker Wisconsin Recall Election Matters

Scott Walker is a canary in a coal mine.

The Right's Fixation With 'Vetting' Obama

American voters can use the past four years to judge Obama's qualifications as president

Voters Tuning Out Flood of 2012 Super PAC, Campaign Ads

This will be the year of grassroots voters, not Nielsen families.

Advertisement