Debate Club

Is Going Over the 'Fiscal Cliff' Necessarily the Worst Outcome? >

Expiring Tax Relief Would Hammer Middle Class

We can manage sequester, but tax hikes will cripple the middle class and small businesses

November 16, 2012

About Pete Sepp:

Pete Sepp is executive vice president of the National Taxpayers Union.

The situation known as the "fiscal cliff" is made up of multiple precipices, some much steeper and more worrisome than others.

One part—the so-called "sequester" that would reduce domestic and defense expenditures by $109 billion next year—is more like a downhill slide we can (and should) manage. After all, the federal government is spending over $3.5 trillion in the current fiscal year, roughly $500 billion more than in 2008. The National Taxpayers Union spearheaded a coalition letter signed by a "who's who" of 22 fiscally conservative organizations urging Congress to respect the sequester. If Congress changes the mix of program cuts, so be it. However, backing away from the $109 billion goal would cause more harm to Congress's already sagging credibility—and over the long run, our nation's credit—than moving forward now.

[See a collection of political cartoons on the fiscal cliff.]

Most significantly: expiring tax relief, the end of protections against the Alternative Minimum Tax, and new taxes associated with the federal healthcare law amount to a yawning chasm five times as deep as the spending sequester.

Tax rates for all brackets would go up, hammering the middle class and small businesses. The expanded Earned Income Tax Credit and other provisions that Democrats tend to favor would spread the damage far beyond any single party's constituency. Furthermore, a sensitive financial system would be crunched by capital gains and dividend tax hikes.

Purely administrative headaches to businesses and individuals will cause serious pain too. Thanks to dithering on both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue it's possible that the 2013 income tax filing season will be delayed or disrupted even if an agreement on extending the tax laws is reached soon.

[See a collection of political cartoons on the budget and deficit.]

Temporary policies like these are another reason why the tax code should be scrapped in favor of a new system; but it should be done deliberatively, not by default.

If the nation is able to keep moving after such failures of leadership, there is yet another fiscal cliff awaiting.

Entitlement spending was deliberately dodged when the debt-ceiling deal that is triggering the sequester cuts was passed. Regardless of what happens on the tax hike front, Washington's promises surrounding social welfare programs are unsustainable. Congress and the president must address this challenge and build a path over this giant canyon. Otherwise the United States will experience a fall it cannot limp away from—and the nation's taxpayers as well as our neediest citizens will hit the ground first.

Tags:
economy,
fiscal cliff,
taxes,
deficit and national debt
Other Arguments
#1

No — Republicans must offer a deal to avoid just part of the cliff

FORD O'CONNELL, Republican Strategist, Conservative Activist, and Political Analyst

#2
#4

No — The economy will not just immediately drop into recession on January 1

ALAN BARBER, Domestic Communications Director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research

#4

Yes — Going off the cliff would make our current economic pain seem pleasant

BILL FRENZEL, Guest Scholar in Economic Studies at the Brookings Institution

#6

Yes — Congress and the administration must find a way to avoid the fiscal cliff

JAMES CAPRETTA, Fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center

#7

No — Billionaires can stand the pain of tax increases, but seniors can't

BRAD BANNON, President of Bannon Communications Research

#8
#9

Yes — The country can't afford major fiscal reform right now

MICHAEL LIND, Cofounder of the New America Foundation

Reader Comments ()

About Debate Club

A meeting of the sharpest minds on the day's most important topics, Debate Club brings in the best arguments and lets readers decide which is the most persuasive. Read the arguments, then vote. And be sure to check back often to see who has gotten the most support—and also to see what's being discussed now in the Debate Club.

Have ideas about what the Club should be debating? E-mail it to dclub@usnews.com.

You can also join the debate on Facebook or follow Debate Club on Twitter.

Advertisement
Cartoons
Thomas Jefferson Street Blog
Obamacare Opponents Have to Keep Pushing Repeal

The way to repeal Obamacare is to hasten its ugly results.

Can Obama's Berlin Speech Match John F. Kennedy's and Ronald Reagan's?

The two famous Berlin speeches almost never were.

Reform Conservatives Need to Tackle Unemployment and Jobs

"Reform conservatives" are doing good work, but need to think about the ills of long-term unemployment.

If Background Checks are Good Enough for Guns, They're Good Enough for Jobs

Employers need to be able to consider all factors before making a hire.

NSA Leaker Edward Snowden Is Neither a Whistle-Blower Nor a Civil Disobeyer

Resisters who break a law must accept that they may be arrested and have a duty to submit to punishment.

Obama Should Bring Small Business Owners on His Trip to Africa

This country needs a national reality show.

Russian President Vladimir Putin’s Divorce and Robert Kraft’s Super Bowl Ring

What took Lyudmila Putina so long?

Syria, Israel and the Obama Administration's Absentee Foreign Policy

Creating a mess you are going to leave for someone else to clean up is not a good way to manage U.S. foreign policy.

Advertisement