Is Fracking a Good Idea? >
Learn the Hard Lessons of Coal Pollution
Use foresight to get smart regulations in place, then we can talk about fracking
November 29, 2011
About Trent Dougherty:
Trent Dougherty is Director of Legal Affairs for the Ohio Environmental Council, Ohio's leading statewide environmental and conservation advocacy organization. Trent is General Counsel and the chief legal analyst and advocate for OEC's Agriculture & Clean Water; Clean Air & Energy; and Legislative Affairs policy programs.
Drilling for oil and gas is not new. Fracking is not necessarily new. What's new? The massive and unprecedented scale, that's what. To exploit the deep, natural gas-rich shale deposits, like the Utica and Marcellus in Appalachia, operators must drill and frack like never before. This scale of drilling requires more of everything: more acreage (5 acres cleared per well pad); more chemicals to stimulate production; more fresh water (estimated 5 million gallons per fracking cycle); and more truck traffic (estimated 13,000 diesel truck trips per site).
With such colossal-scale drilling, it is imperative that we take a collective breath and make certain that regulations truly protect our gas-field communities. Unfortunately, that is not the current state of the law (or the politics). Prime example: The oil and gas industry continues to receive special treatment in the form of exemptions from federal water, air, drinking water, and hazardous waste laws.
[Check out our new Energy Intelligence blog.]
Yet, we need to focus on the risks, not just federal exemptions. As fracking has increased nationally, the number of documented spills, blowouts, leaks, and explosions from poor well construction is shocking. The environmental and human consequences have been very serious (and well documented) in a number of states, including Pennsylvania, Texas, Wyoming, and Colorado.
Wastewater from the shale deposits contains radioactive material and heavy metals (not to mention the witch's brew of frack fluid). Waste disposal, thus, is a risky proposition. Risks can be temporarily mitigated through reusing the frack water, but current regulations don't require it. In fact, there have been permits granted allowing disposal through local treatment facilities and discharged into recreational and drinking water sources.
[See a slide show of 10 reasons Americans aren't talking about climate change.]
However, it's not only water but also air regulations that need to catch up with the drilling. Drilling and production emit tons of nasty stuff like hydrogen sulfide, VOCs, and methane (a greenhouse gas more climate-impacting than CO2). But, U.S. EPA is only now starting the process of regulating air pollutants from drilling--and methane is not yet part of the discussion.
My governor, Ohio's John Kasich, claims that fracking is a "godsend" for our economy. He may be correct. Yet, taking time to get human health protections right may make us all richer in the long run. Or, at least, save us from future buyers' remorse. Just take a lesson from coal. Around the country, dirty coal plants are closing or adding expensive equipment to mitigate decades of pollution. What if we had the foresight 50 years ago to ensure that our coal plants were regulated properly? Imagine how many premature deaths could have been avoided. We have that opportunity now with fracking--if we only seize it.
- Republicans Grill Obama Administration on Fracking, Offshore Lands.
- Check out U.S. News Weekly, now available on iPad.
- A Gift for the Winter Season: Natural Gas.
- Other Arguments
-
#1468165
-
#2287140
No — The gas industry promises to "do it right," but there is no such thing
JOHN DETWILER, Private Citizen with Marcellus Shale Protest
-
#3249131
No — Fracking unleashes carcinogens and other chemicals that are toxic to biological life
TRACY CARLUCCIO, Deputy Director of the Delaware Riverkeeper Network
-
#4234125
No — An impotent government regulatory body is a recipe for disaster
SCOTT M. STRINGER, Manhattan Borough President
-
#6176191
Yes — Wind and solar power are intermittent and require coal and natural gas backup
JON OLSON, Associate Professor in the Petroleum and Geosystems Engineering Department at the University of Texas at Austin
-
#7234260
Yes — The economic benefits of the shale gas boom outweigh unproven risks
DANIEL SIMMONS, Director of State Affairs at the Institute for Energy Research
-
#8138187
Yes — Worried about chemicals used in fracking fluid? Let's break it down for you
CHRIS FAULKNER, Founder, President, and CEO of Breitling Oil and Gas
-
#9148208
Yes — Advances mean even more energy without a significant threat to groundwater
LEE FULLER, Vice President of Government Relations for the Independent Petroleum Association of America
-
#10147214
Yes — The Marcellus Shale has become a potent economic engine for Pennsylvania
GREGG LASKOSKI, Senior Petroleum Analyst for GasBuddy.com
Reader Comments Read all comments (3)
John of OH 7:16PM December 03, 2011
Taras of CO 1:00PM November 30, 2011
David in Houston of TX 9:19AM November 30, 2011