Debate Club

Is Fracking a Good Idea? >

Fracking Technology Has Been Used Safely for Years

Advances mean even more energy without a significant threat to groundwater

November 29, 2011

About Lee Fuller:

Lee Fuller is the vice president of government relations for the Independent Petroleum Association of America and executive director of Energy In Depth. Fuller, a chemical engineer, is a former staff director of the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, having served in that capacity under Democratic U.S. Sen. Lloyd Bentsen of Texas.

In asking the question of whether the use of hydraulic fracturing is "a good idea," the premise appears to be based on an assumption that the technology is "a new idea" as well.

But the truth is, fracturing technology has been deployed in the United States for nearly 65 years, not only as a way to optimize the production of oil and natural gas, but also to do the same for water wells and geothermal energy. EPA has even used it as a means of remediating Superfund sites. All told, more than 1.2 million oil and natural gas wells have undergone fracture stimulation since the technology was first introduced in Hugoton Field of Kansas in 1947--helping our country produce billions of barrels of oil and trillions of cubic feet of natural gas, generating millions of jobs and billions in annual revenues in the process.

[A Gift for the Winter Season: Natural Gas.]

But is hydraulic fracturing safe? A few clicks around the Internet might lead some to conclude it isn't. But contrary to what you may have read in the chat rooms, no less an authority than the EPA has publicly stated that fracturing does not pose a significant threat to groundwater, with EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson recently reinforcing that point to a committee of the U.S. Senate. It's a finding that's been corroborated by the U.S. Departments of Energy and the Interior, by countless state regulators, and by the Ground Water Protection Council, which recently launched a new nationwide database with information on the materials used in the fracturing process available on a searchable, well-by-well basis.

The other charge that we often hear is that the hydraulic fracturing used today is dramatically different from the fracturing technology of yesterday; that the development of natural gas from shale is completely different from the development of energy from different strata.

[Republicans Grill Obama Administration on Fracking, Offshore Lands.]

On this, the critics have a point, to a point: Thanks to advances in horizontal drilling, today's technology allows us to produce many times the amount of energy we did in the past--but doing so by drilling many fewer wells. Just take a look at Pennsylvania: The number of wells drilled in 2010 was 30 percent less than the number in 2005. But even with this decrease in activity, Pennsylvania today is producing roughly 12 times the volume of natural gas per day that it did back then.

But the core mechanics of fracturing a natural gas well haven't changed much over the years: We're still talking about the deployment of water, sand, pressure, and small percentages of additives down a wellbore to enhance the flow of energy up it. Is the technology's continued use a good idea? I'd suggest that is, unless you happen to be someone who's living in the dark. Or would like to be.

Tags:
natural gas,
gas prices,
energy
Other Arguments
#1
#2

No — The gas industry promises to "do it right," but there is no such thing

JOHN DETWILER, Private Citizen with Marcellus Shale Protest

#3
#4
#5

Yes — Wind and solar power are intermittent and require coal and natural gas backup

JON OLSON, Associate Professor in the Petroleum and Geosystems Engineering Department at the University of Texas at Austin

#6

No — Use foresight to get smart regulations in place, then we can talk about fracking

TRENT DOUGHERTY, Director of Legal Affairs for the Ohio Environmental Council

#7

Yes — The economic benefits of the shale gas boom outweigh unproven risks

DANIEL SIMMONS, Director of State Affairs at the Institute for Energy Research

#8

Yes — Worried about chemicals used in fracking fluid? Let's break it down for you

CHRIS FAULKNER, Founder, President, and CEO of Breitling Oil and Gas

#10
About Debate Club

A meeting of the sharpest minds on the day's most important topics, Debate Club brings in the best arguments and lets readers decide which is the most persuasive. Read the arguments, then vote. And be sure to check back often to see who has gotten the most support—and also to see what's being discussed now in the Debate Club.

Have ideas about what the Club should be debating? E-mail it to dclub@usnews.com.

You can also join the debate on Facebook or follow Debate Club on Twitter.

Advertisement
Cartoons
Thomas Jefferson Street Blog
Obamacare Opponents Have to Keep Pushing Repeal

The way to repeal Obamacare is to hasten its ugly results.

Can Obama's Berlin Speech Match John F. Kennedy's and Ronald Reagan's?

The two famous Berlin speeches almost never were.

Reform Conservatives Need to Tackle Unemployment and Jobs

"Reform conservatives" are doing good work, but need to think about the ills of long-term unemployment.

If Background Checks are Good Enough for Guns, They're Good Enough for Jobs

Employers need to be able to consider all factors before making a hire.

NSA Leaker Edward Snowden Is Neither a Whistle-Blower Nor a Civil Disobeyer

Resisters who break a law must accept that they may be arrested and have a duty to submit to punishment.

Obama Should Bring Small Business Owners on His Trip to Africa

This country needs a national reality show.

Russian President Vladimir Putin’s Divorce and Robert Kraft’s Super Bowl Ring

What took Lyudmila Putina so long?

Syria, Israel and the Obama Administration's Absentee Foreign Policy

Creating a mess you are going to leave for someone else to clean up is not a good way to manage U.S. foreign policy.

Advertisement