Debate Club

Is Fracking a Good Idea? >

Fracking Is Not a Solution

The gas industry promises to "do it right," but there is no such thing

November 29, 2011

About John Detwiler:

John Detwiler is a private citizen with Marcellus Shale Protest, a grassroots group of 500 people in western Pennsylvania, and one of dozens of such groups across the United States. He is also a business owner, management consultant, and a Registered Professional Engineer.

Too many of America's government officials, nonprofit organizations, and private citizens are caught up in a futile effort to "manage" fracking, when we need to ban the practice altogether (as is already happening in parts of our nation and around the world).

"Fracking," and the entire process of shale gas extraction, is not the solution to our energy challenges, as the oil and gas industry portrays it to us; instead, it is scraping the bottom of the geological barrel, bringing unacceptable health, climate, and environmental consequences while delaying and distracting us from developing energy policies to ensure our children's future.

[See a slide show of 10 reasons Americans aren't talking about climate change.]

Marcellus Shale Protest advocates a total ban on shale gas extraction, instead of "regulation", because:

  1. Our scientific understanding is inadequate for responsible risk management. The environmental and health consequences of shale gas drilling are hard to measure, but pervasive and potentially irreversible. Proposed regulations address only those substances for which we already have criteria. The chemical mixture in "fracking fluid" is only one of many sources of environmental contamination; abandoned capped wells, after economic production ends, will be hazards for millennia to come--far longer than all human experience with concrete and steel.
  2. The industry's campaign of disinformation has hijacked public dialog. Citizens can't realistically appraise "risk-benefit" decisions when they are shouted-down by phony claims of imagined economic security and "energy independence," and while their actual experience (deteriorating health, destruction of property values, diversion of water and crop-land) is mocked and trivialized, and court cases remain sealed.
  3. Democratic institutions are being corrupted by industry money and power. Elected officials, university researchers and educators, consultants, and media outlets can't be relied upon to advocate for the public interest when they depend upon donations and revenues from industry.
  4. A false sense of urgency has been created. There is no near-term domestic demand for shale gas (which, ultimately, will be exported for higher margins to Asia). In truth, energy companies desperately need to prop up their accounting house-of-cards, of which "proven reserves" and "acreage held-by-production" are the foundation.

The gas industry promises to "do it right," when there is no such thing; and, in our current political climate, there is no chance of holding this industry accountable. Marcellus Shale Protest views the media fixation upon regulations and taxation as missing the point, and we continue to insist on a total ban as the only responsible public policy.

Tags:
energy policy and climate change,
natural gas,
gas prices
Other Arguments
#1
#3
#4
#5

Yes — Wind and solar power are intermittent and require coal and natural gas backup

JON OLSON, Associate Professor in the Petroleum and Geosystems Engineering Department at the University of Texas at Austin

#6

No — Use foresight to get smart regulations in place, then we can talk about fracking

TRENT DOUGHERTY, Director of Legal Affairs for the Ohio Environmental Council

#7

Yes — The economic benefits of the shale gas boom outweigh unproven risks

DANIEL SIMMONS, Director of State Affairs at the Institute for Energy Research

#8

Yes — Worried about chemicals used in fracking fluid? Let's break it down for you

CHRIS FAULKNER, Founder, President, and CEO of Breitling Oil and Gas

#9

Yes — Advances mean even more energy without a significant threat to groundwater

LEE FULLER, Vice President of Government Relations for the Independent Petroleum Association of America

#10
About Debate Club

A meeting of the sharpest minds on the day's most important topics, Debate Club brings in the best arguments and lets readers decide which is the most persuasive. Read the arguments, then vote. And be sure to check back often to see who has gotten the most support—and also to see what's being discussed now in the Debate Club.

Have ideas about what the Club should be debating? E-mail it to dclub@usnews.com.

You can also join the debate on Facebook or follow Debate Club on Twitter.

Advertisement
Cartoons
Thomas Jefferson Street Blog
President Obama's Code Pink Heckler Medea Benjamin Was Plain Rude

It's become acceptable for people to interrupt the president while he is delivering a formal speech on a deadly serious topic.

Obama Commerce Nominee Penny Pritzker’s Tax Problem

Obama’s Commerce Department nominee has some Romney-esque tax issues.

Oklahoma Tornado Reminds Us of the Value of Teachers

The Oklahoma tornado reminds us of all the roles teachers take on.

IRS, AP and James Rosen Scandals Strike at the First Amendment

The Obama scandals paint a picture of an administration at odds with the First Amendment.

Anthony Weiner Is Too Liberal to Be New York City Mayor

New York City doesn't need another Democratic mayor.

Organizations Masquerading as Tax-Exempt is the Real IRS Scandal

The real scandal at the IRS is electioneering groups getting tax-exempt status.

E.W. Jackson Proves the Tea Party Learned Nothing

By nominating E.W. Jackson, Virginia Republicans hope extremism will save them.

IRS, AP and Benghazi Are Not Obama Scandals

The word "scandal" doesn't appropriately describe anything going on in Washington these days.

Advertisement