Debate Club

Is a Flat Tax a Good Idea? >

Flat Tax Would Introduce New Problems

A flat tax doesn't solve our problems; it just introduces new ones

November 1, 2011

About Kelly Phillips Erb:

Kelly Phillips Erb is a founding shareholder of the Erb Law Firm, PC, in Philadelphia, Pa., where she focuses on tax law for businesses and families. Kelly authors the popular Taxgirl blog for Forbes.com; the blog has been recognized by the ABA Journal as one of the top 100 blogs written by lawyers for the past three years running.

It's a bit of a trick question, isn't it? Because in the United States, even if we decided that it was a good idea, we'd never actually embrace a pure flat tax.

The variations that are being rolled out by presidential candidates like Perry and Cain aren't actually a pure flat tax; a pure flat rate would mean that one tax rate is applied to all income with no deductions or exemptions. As taxpayers, we like our deductions and exemptions. So many of the flat tax proposals already chip away at the simplicity of a flat tax by adding ands, ifs, and buts in an effort to appeal to voters: That's exactly how our tax code became so bloated in the first place.

That said, even with deductions and exemptions, I don't believe that a flat tax is a good idea. A flat tax isn't fair: 10 percent of income at the bottom isn't equal to 10 percent of income at the top. The cost of most goods is fixed, meaning that you don't pay proportionally less for gas or milk if you make less money. The price of merely surviving is somewhat fixed, making a flat tax not quite as flat as proponents like to pretend.

[Vote: Do the Rich Pay Enough in Taxes?]

Additionally, most flat tax proposals are based on earned income, which means that unearned income like interest and dividends would escape taxation. Taxpayers who work for a living would end up paying a higher rate of tax, relatively speaking, than those who relied on investments for the majority of income (like Jobs and Buffett). How is that remotely equitable?

Of course, fair is clearly a relative concept. It's pretty difficult to get to a point that feels "fair" to everyone along the income spectrum. But maybe that's not quite the right end. About 25 years ago, Reagan embraced the idea of parity within each income bracket. That idea has some merit: In other words, each group of taxpayers who were similarly situated would pay the same rate of tax. It's not a flat tax but it speaks to the same goals: fair and simple. And I think it comes closer to achieving them.

I agree that our current tax code is broken. But throwing it out in favor of something that can quickly grow to just as broken isn't the answer. A flat tax doesn't solve our problems: It just introduces new ones.

Tags:
federal taxes
Other Arguments
#1

No — Flat tax would cut taxes only for the rich, which never ends well

JOHN IRONS, Research and Policy Director at the Economic Policy Institute

#2
#3
#4

No — The middle class pays more so the rich can pay less

DEAN BAKER, Author of 'The End of Loser Liberalism: Making Markets Progressive'

#5

Yes — The Cut, Balance and Grow plan will unleash economic growth

RICK PERRY, Texas Governor and Presidential Candidate

#6

No — Flat tax will benefit only the richest taxpayers

STEVE WAMHOFF, Legislative Director of Citizens for Tax Justice

#7
#8

Yes — Flat tax would spur foreign investment, job creation, and economic growth

MARY KATE CARY, Former White House Speechwriter for President George H.W. Bush

Reader Comments Read all comments (8)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

It is rather obvious, isn't it?, that to have a flat rate means the poor pay more and the rich pay less. Is that good for a fair society? Or maybe the idea is that the rich, who are in power, couldn't care less about a fair society? They can get out to the south of France when the revolution comes.

Keith Tunstall 12:48PM December 30, 2011

The flat tax seems to put more pressure on the poor for the governments mistakes so I disagree with the plan.

James of NC 2:43PM November 28, 2011

A flat tax makes sure everyone pays tax at the same rates for goods... Then the drug dealers- prostitutes- crooks and robbers could start contributing too...

Every one buys gas- ciggs- milk- bread- soda pop- bus tickets- etc...

Any one receiving government help needs drug testing, if found positive, no benefits..

Benefits shall be available for a limited period to anyone who shows up for daily work labor and drug free!

Barb of FL 11:26PM November 27, 2011

About Debate Club

A meeting of the sharpest minds on the day's most important topics, Debate Club brings in the best arguments and lets readers decide which is the most persuasive. Read the arguments, then vote. And be sure to check back often to see who has gotten the most support—and also to see what's being discussed now in the Debate Club.


Have ideas about what the Club should be debating? E-mail it to dclub@usnews.com.


You can also join the debate on Facebook or follow Debate Club on Twitter.

Advertisement
Cartoons
Thomas Jefferson Street Blog
Donald Trump Makes Kim Kardashian Look Good

At least Kim Kardashian doesn't take herself seriously.

The Vietnam War Still Haunts Us

History rhymes once again, thanks so much.

'Transcripters' Make Birthers Look Smart

Now the fringe right wants the president's university grades to prove he wasn't a good student.

Obama Must Do More to Protect the Intellectual Property Industry

The Obama administration needs to protect the industry's creativity and innovation.

Is Congress Getting Dumber?

That Congress is speaking at a lower grade level than it was seven years ago may be due to the unfortunate tendency to equate education with elitism.

Obama's Remarkable Silence on Latin American Press Abuses

President Obama's silence on press freedom in Latin America is troubling.

Why the Media Is Giving Romney a Pass on Trump's Birtherism

Why the media hasn't pressed Mitt Romney about Donald Trump's birther fantasies.

Romney's Bain Experience Wasn't Real American Capitalism

The fact that Bain Capital served to make money for investors, not to create jobs, could endanger Romney.

Advertisement