Has the Obama Campaign Gone Too Negative?
As former Gov. Mitt Romney steps onto the pedestal of GOP presidential nominee, President Barack Obama’s campaign has come out swinging, Monday releasing an ad called “We’ve Heard It All Before” criticizing Romney’s economic record as governor. Obama ran on an optimistic platform of “Hope” and “Change” in 2008, so a leaner, meaner campaign machine in 2012 that attacks Romney from the start may be jarring to some voters.
Seasoned politicos recall that Obama’s 2008 primary battle against now-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was no walk in the park. However, this time around, critics argue that Obama’s negative campaigning is proof that—with a sluggish economy and healthcare, his signature legislation, still very controversial and possibly on the verge of being struck down—an aggressive attack on Romney is the only weapon he has left. Obama supporters insist that the well-funded Romney campaign carpet-bombed his rivals in the primary, and in the age of Citizens United and Super PACs, the president must fight fire with fire. But how will the voters take it? Has the Obama campaign already gone too negative? Here is the Debate Club’s take:
The Arguments
Yes — Barack Obama is campaigning on Mitt Romney's faults rather than his successes
FORD O'CONNELL, Republican Strategist, Conservative Activist, and Political Analyst Comment (1)
Yes — Barack Obama hasn't accomplished anything and refuses to hold himself accountable
REINCE PRIEBUS, Chairman of the Republican National Committee Comment (6)
Yes — Barack Obama's rhetoric is costing him important allies
MERCEDES SCHLAPP, Cofounder of Cove Strategies Comment (2)
No — For Obama to not engage in the battle with Romney would be a drastic mistake
PETER FENN, Democratic Political Strategist and Head of Fenn Communications Comment (2)
No — The Obama campaign must define Mitt Romney for what he is: a corporate vulture
BRAD BANNON, President of Bannon Communications Research Comment (4)
