Debate Club

Has the Dishonesty in the 2012 Campaign Reached Unprecedented Lows? >

Campaign 2012 Isn't the Nastiest, Just the Most Covered

The Romney-Obama race isn’t any nastier than past campaigns, it’s just getting more media attention

August 10, 2012

About Lara Brown:

Lara M. Brown, Ph.D., is an assistant professor in the Department of Political Science at Villanova University and the author of Jockeying for the American Presidency: The Political Opportunism of Aspirants. She also served in President William J. Clinton’s administration at the U.S. Department of Education.

Liar. Immoral. Heartless. Weak. Duplicitous. Unfit. Coward. Nuts. Dangerous. Felon. Killer. These epithets are not from the 2012 presidential campaign. They're merely a few of the more ugly insults and slurs that have colored previous presidential elections.

Joseph Cummins sums it up best: "Probably the only clean election in American history was the first one, in 1789, in which George Washington ran unopposed."

[See a collection of political cartoons on the 2012 campaign.]

A few of history's lowlights:

  • In 1876, a Democratic whisper campaign suggested that Republican Rutherford B. Hayes had shot and wounded his own mother in a drunken "fit of insanity."
  • In 1884, the Democrats not only skewered the Republican candidate for his corrupt railroad dealings, but they regularly chanted at party rallies and during parades, "Blaine, Blaine, James G. Blaine, the Continental liar from the state of Maine."
  • Republicans shot back that Democratic candidate Grover Cleveland was a "lecherous beast" and a "moral leper," owing to Cleveland's past of fathering an illegitimate child and then committing the mother (his former mistress) to an insane asylum.
  • In 1896, the New York Times, then a supporter of Republican William McKinley's presidential campaign, published an editorial in late September, which questioned William Jennings Bryan's sanity. They based their hit piece on an unnamed doctor's observational diagnosis the Democratic candidate.
  • In 1920, the New York Times again came to the aid of a Republican presidential candidate. They helped refute a Democratic whisper campaign about Warren Harding that had been started by a racist professor in Ohio, suggesting that Harding's ancestors were black.
  • In 1952, Republicans not only spread rumors that Democratic candidate Adlai Stevenson was homosexual, but they also twisted an accidental shooting in 1912 into a campaign piece, alleging that Stevenson had killed a girl "in a jealous rage."
  • In 1964, President Lyndon B. Johnson created a "dirty tricks" committee and produced a pamphlet, Barry Goldwater: Extremism on the Right, depicting Goldwater as unfit for the presidency and truly dangerous for the country.
  • Goldwater's campaign returned the favor by publishing a book about Johnson's turpitude entitled: A Texan Looks at Lyndon: A Study in Illegitimate Power, which among other things held that Johnson had friends and associates of John F. Kennedy killed.

[Check out our editorial cartoons on President Obama.]

Past campaigns were not high-minded debates over the issues. Negative attacks and character assassinations have long been part of our history. The only thing different today is that thanks to the nature of the Internet and round-the-clock news every slanderous charge gets amplified and spread around the country at the click of a button. Still, the truth is as President Harry S. Truman observed, "The only thing new in the world is the history you don't know."

Tags:
Barack Obama,
Mitt Romney,
2012 presidential election
Other Arguments
#1
#2

No — Americans always think the most recent campaign is the nastiest

BRAD BANNON, President of Bannon Communications Research

About Debate Club

A meeting of the sharpest minds on the day's most important topics, Debate Club brings in the best arguments and lets readers decide which is the most persuasive. Read the arguments, then vote. And be sure to check back often to see who has gotten the most support—and also to see what's being discussed now in the Debate Club.

Have ideas about what the Club should be debating? E-mail it to dclub@usnews.com.

You can also join the debate on Facebook or follow Debate Club on Twitter.

Advertisement
Cartoons
Thomas Jefferson Street Blog
Democrats Should Be Worried About Polls After Obama Scandals

Democrats should be more worried about President Obama's approval ratings.

Tea Party IRS Rally Should Wait Until After Moore Tornado Recovery

Tea party rallies against the IRS should wait until the tornado victims are taken care of.

God Bless America and the Boy Scouts

The Fund does the right thing by pushing the Boy Scouts to lift its ban on gay members.

IRS, AP and Benghazi Show the Failure of Obama's Big Government

Giving an inefficient organization like the IRS more responsibility makes it more likely to screw up, not better able to solve this nation’s problems.

Coburn Wants Oklahoma Tornado Aid Offset With Budget Cuts

Oklahoma Senator Tom Coburn wants spending cuts before aid is sent to tornado victims in his own state.

Crowdfunding Zack Braff's Film And Robert Griffin's Gifts Is a Mistake

Rich people don't need donations from the public.

Poll Shows Americans Find Obama's IRS Story Barely Believable

There is still something fishy about the scandal at the IRS.

Do Benghazi, AP and IRS Scandals Reflect Obama’s Leadership Style?

It may be that a flawed leadership style is filtering down to the rest of the government.

Advertisement