Debate Club

Does the United States Need a Balanced Budget Amendment? >

Act Now to Prevent a Debt Crisis

A well-designed constitutional amendment would prevent overspending, and worse

November 23, 2011

About David Primo:

David M. Primo, a senior scholar at George Mason University's Mercatus Center and associate professor of political science and business administration at the University of Rochester, is the author of an award-winning book on budget rules, Rules and Restraint: Government Spending the Design of Institutions, and several papers on the subject, including "Making Budget Rules Work."

The United States needs constitutional rules to bring discipline to the federal budget process. Congress has repeatedly attempted to create binding limits on its tendency to overspend. In the 1980s, it was Gramm-Rudman-Hollings legislation to reduce deficits. In the 1990s, it was caps on discretionary spending and limits on new government programs. In 2011, it is the specter of 1.2 trillion in cuts (or more accurately, reductions in spending increases) due to the failure of the super committee. These controls all have a common element: They were undone or evaded (or soon will be) by a Congress unwilling to hold itself accountable. For instance, even before the super committee had failed, Sen. John McCain and others discussed undoing the "automatic" cuts that were to be the consequence of failure.

[See a collection of political cartoons on the budget and deficit.]

Constitutional rules are credible and durable in ways that internal controls or even statutes are not. They cannot easily be changed, and if properly designed, cannot easily be evaded. The phrase "properly designed" is crucial. Critics of constitutional budget rules often point to a poorly designed proposal and say, in effect, "Proposal A is bad, so all constitutional rules are bad." This just isn't true.

My research on balanced budget rules in the U.S. states shows that well-designed rules lead to lower spending. Moreover, a constitutional budget rule that (a) applies to the entire federal budget—no exceptions, (b) is difficult to waive, except in true emergencies, and (c) is constructed to limit loopholes or gimmicks will be effective at forcing Congress to make hard spending decisions.

[Read: GOP Frosh Slam "Hypocrisy" from Democrats on Balanced Budget Bill.]

Considering Congress' track record, there is perhaps only one other way to achieve fiscal discipline, and that is a debt crisis. But is America really destined to become like Greece or Italy? Right now that scenario seems far-fetched. But consider this: A recent report by the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission notes that the Chinese renminbi could pose a threat to the dominance of the U.S. dollar in as little as five to 10 years. And when that happens, we will be much more vulnerable to a debt crisis. We need to act now to prevent a crisis, and constitutional budget reform is an important place to start.

Tags:
debt,
deficit and national debt,
federal budget
Other Arguments
#2
#3

No — Don't blame the Consitution for the incompetence of politicians

SCOTT LILLY, Senior Fellow at the Center for American Progress

#4

No — The Constitution restricts federal spending already

TAD DEHAVEN, Budget Analyst on Federal and State Budget Issues for the Cato Institute

#5

No — Political gimmick has potentially disastrous consequences for the nation

PATRICK SHARMA, Postdoctoral Fellow in the Regional Oral History Office of the Bancroft Library at UC Berkeley

#6

No — Limits would sabotage the government's ability to pull the nationout of an economic downturn

STEVE WAMHOFF, Policy Analyst for ITEP and the Legislative Director of Citizens for Tax Justice

About Debate Club

A meeting of the sharpest minds on the day's most important topics, Debate Club brings in the best arguments and lets readers decide which is the most persuasive. Read the arguments, then vote. And be sure to check back often to see who has gotten the most support—and also to see what's being discussed now in the Debate Club.

Have ideas about what the Club should be debating? E-mail it to dclub@usnews.com.

You can also join the debate on Facebook or follow Debate Club on Twitter.

Advertisement
Cartoons
Thomas Jefferson Street Blog
President Obama's Code Pink Heckler Medea Benjamin Was Plain Rude

It's become acceptable for people to interrupt the president while he is delivering a formal speech on a deadly serious topic.

Obama Commerce Nominee Penny Pritzker’s Tax Problem

Obama’s Commerce Department nominee has some Romney-esque tax issues.

Oklahoma Tornado Reminds Us of the Value of Teachers

The Oklahoma tornado reminds us of all the roles teachers take on.

IRS, AP and James Rosen Scandals Strike at the First Amendment

The Obama scandals paint a picture of an administration at odds with the First Amendment.

Anthony Weiner Is Too Liberal to Be New York City Mayor

New York City doesn't need another Democratic mayor.

Organizations Masquerading as Tax-Exempt is the Real IRS Scandal

The real scandal at the IRS is electioneering groups getting tax-exempt status.

E.W. Jackson Proves the Tea Party Learned Nothing

By nominating E.W. Jackson, Virginia Republicans hope extremism will save them.

IRS, AP and Benghazi Are Not Obama Scandals

The word "scandal" doesn't appropriately describe anything going on in Washington these days.

Advertisement