Debate Club

Does the J.P. Morgan Loss Prove the Need for Tougher Bank Regulations? >

J.P. Morgan Was Gambling, Not Hedging

J.P. Morgan's gambling should be made illegal with a strong Volcker Rule

May 18, 2012

About Ed Mierzwinski:

Ed Mierzwinski is the federal Consumer Program director and senior fellow for U.S. Public Interest Research Group, where he also writes a blog.

J.P. Morgan Chase's gambling losses keep going up. What was just a "manageable" $2 billion loss a few days ago is over $3 billion and could easily reach $5 billion or more. Yet, J.P. Morgan's loss can be our win if we seize this moment to make the outrageous Wall Street practice of betting other people's money illegal by implementing a strong Volcker Rule to rein in proprietary trading. Of course, J.P. Morgan Chase will keep calling the trades that led to its massive and sudden losses "hedging against risk," not proprietary trading, and so will other Wall Street bankers arrayed in phalanxes in Washington to delay and weaken the Volcker Rule and keep the Commodity Futures Trading Commission off the corporate crime beat. But these are some of the same people who insist that the 2008 financial collapse wasn't their fault. It's time for the Federal Reserve and other regulators to implement the strong Volcker Rule as intended by the former Fed chairman and Sens. Jeff Merkley and Carl Levin, its champions. J.P. Morgan was gambling, not hedging. Only a strong Volcker Rule will protect taxpayers, depositors, and our economy.

Tags:
loans,
banking,
JPMorgan Chase
Other Arguments
#1

No — The solution is not tougher regulations on banks, but stronger enforcement of existing regulations

JAMES BARTH, Co-author of 'Guardians of Finance: Making Regulators Work for Us'

#2

No — J.P. Morgan's loss doesn't mean more regulation is needed

DAVID JOHN, Fellow at the Heritage Foundation

#3
#4

No — Making "traditional" loans is just as risky as J.P. Morgan's trading loss

ALEX POLLOCK, Resident Fellow at the American Enterprise Institute.

#6

No — Let's not overreact to the J.P. Morgan trading loss

DOUGLAS ELLIOTT, Fellow in Economic Studies at The Brookings Institution

About Debate Club

A meeting of the sharpest minds on the day's most important topics, Debate Club brings in the best arguments and lets readers decide which is the most persuasive. Read the arguments, then vote. And be sure to check back often to see who has gotten the most support—and also to see what's being discussed now in the Debate Club.

Have ideas about what the Club should be debating? E-mail it to dclub@usnews.com.

You can also join the debate on Facebook or follow Debate Club on Twitter.

Advertisement
Cartoons
Thomas Jefferson Street Blog
Oklahoma Tornado Reminds Us of the Value of Teachers

The Oklahoma tornado reminds us of all the roles teachers take on.

IRS, AP and James Rosen Scandals Strike at the First Amendment

The Obama scandals paint a picture of an administration at odds with the First Amendment.

Anthony Weiner Is Too Liberal to Be New York City Mayor

New York City doesn't need another Democratic mayor.

Organizations Masquerading as Tax-Exempt is the Real IRS Scandal

The real scandal at the IRS is electioneering groups getting tax-exempt status.

E.W. Jackson Proves the Tea Party Learned Nothing

By nominating E.W. Jackson, Virginia Republicans hope extremism will save them.

IRS, AP and Benghazi Are Not Obama Scandals

The word "scandal" doesn't appropriately describe anything going on in Washington these days.

Democrats Should Be Worried About Polls After Obama Scandals

Democrats should be more worried about President Obama's approval ratings.

Tea Party IRS Rally Should Wait Until After Moore Tornado Recovery

Tea party rallies against the IRS should wait until the tornado victims are taken care of.

Advertisement